Yeah, I didn't think the article was any good.

But his comment was pretty standalone, and I was replying to it in that context.

I was just challenging the implication that the guy's physique was down to "just" steroids and nothing else. I was just highlighting that there are a lot of steroid users out there, but a lot fewer people with physiques like that.

I wasn't trying to pick a fight. It seems to me that a large chunk of people still think that you can run one cycle of testosterone and look like Phil Heath. I've met quite a few people on gear IRL, and very few had/have a physique comparable to that, and certainly not close to that age.

Again, that paragraph is not related to or commenting to the article. It's a standalone point.