あなたは単独のコメントのスレッドを見ています。

残りのコメントをみる →

[–]pandamite1 252 ポイント253 ポイント  (10子コメント)

Your tic tac toe is impossible. To go first and have 4 placed when the person going second gets 3 in a row.

[–]Qjahshdydhdy 17 ポイント18 ポイント  (2子コメント)

in tic-tac-toe whoever just moved either has the same number of moves as the other player (if they went second), or one more (if they went first). tldr: pandamite1 is correct

[–]CookiesRiot 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (1子コメント)

Except that this game would have ended when X had three turns, which must happen before O has a fourth turn.

[–]Qjahshdydhdy 5 ポイント6 ポイント  (0子コメント)

we agree with each other, let's continue arguing!

[–]Libertah 41 ポイント42 ポイント  (6子コメント)

It's not impossible. The "O" player is just a stupid fuck.

[–]savedbythehell 100 ポイント101 ポイント  (2子コメント)

Forget about strategy, just count the Os and Xs.

Say O goes first: O X O X O X O - There would not be an O after the X because X had just won. The game would have been over at that point.

Say X goes first: X O X O X O O - In this scenario O would have not only gone after X already won, but gone twice in a row.

Neither scenario makes sense.

[–]Baron-Harkonnen 23 ポイント24 ポイント  (1子コメント)

He said "O" is stupid as fuck. He probably went again after losing.

[–]coffeedude7 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Well it's draw in blood so I think it's one person who is just crazy as fuck. Which explains how she doesn't have a T.V. show yet.

NEXT WEEK ON REAL CRIME DRAMA!!

Never mind.

[–]oneinchterror 3 ポイント4 ポイント  (0子コメント)

nope. look at the picture and think about it. its just not possible. even if the O player went first they wouldn't have placed another O after X won

[–]j8sadm632b 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (0子コメント)

It's impossible, X played last and they still have fewer marks.

[–]skyroket 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Hey man, it's probably a kid who doesn't know how to play. Be nice.