Except you did. You called this technology useless based on what it is capable of today.

Really? Why don't you quote me, to show me where I said it.

Who are you to say that?

Someone no different to you offering your opinion. You realise that's all comments are, right? Personal opinions and interpretations. They're not peer reviewed papers.

Which can only happen after making progress. Which won't happen if there are people like you around.

So you've never seen anything and thought, I don't think that's very good yet?

So what if this problem isn't perfect? Same is true for every novelty product ever created. Do you remember how shit and pretty much impractical the first portable telephones were?

Yes, they were shit and impractical. Just like my example of the first plane. It doesn't mean they won't improve. But it doesn't mean they definitely will either.

You are telling others what they should and shouldn't do.

Where?

Just keep your opinion to yourself.

"You are telling others what they should and shouldn't do."

Ahem....

Don't buy the product if you don't like it.

See above....

In the meantime, don't tell people what to do.

....

It's their money. If they want to buy a gadget like this, it doesn't mean kickstarter is shit and it doesn't mean tech like this shouldn't be developed and improved upon.

Where on earth did I say these things? Did you even read my previous comment? I said literally the exact opposite:

" However I am not saying a future, improved version may not fix the issues and become a viable alternative to the traditional umbrella."

And I didn't even mention Kickstarter. You're falsely attributing things to me, then arguing against them.

I am not going to reply to any more of your comments, as your hypocrisy, willful ignorance, and quite frankly baffling lack of logic or coherence make it clearly pointless.