(cache) SRSter in /r/Anarchism on the Internet : SRSsucks

SRSter in /r/Anarchism on the Internet (i.imgur.com)

全ての 153 コメント

[–]Faryshta 28 ポイント29 ポイント30 ポイント 4 日前 (8子コメント)

固定リンク

[–]Nuke_Europe 20 ポイント21 ポイント22 ポイント 4 日前* (3子コメント)

The banning of "hate speech" is considered to be a "human rights" necessity and "human rights activists" are the biggest proponents of such laws.

For example, in Australia, "human rights activists" pushed for a law called the Human Rights and Anti-Discrimination Bill that would have made it illegal to "offend or insult" someone for their "attributes" (including their political beliefs) along with outlawing any expression of religious belief if someone were "offended" by it. The law also would have reversed the burden of proof, since it would declare the "offender" to be automatically guilty unless they could prove their innocence.

In Europe, the "human rights" lobby has pushed for full-blown government surveillance and literal "tolerance camps" for anyone with views deemed "intolerant", including people with "anti-feminist" views and people who express "overt approval of a totalitarian ideology".

"Human rights" groups have tried to get "hate speech" laws passed in the US for decades, but, thankfully, they haven't experienced any success yet.

[–]Faryshta 10 ポイント11 ポイント12 ポイント 3 日前 (0子コメント)

[–]RonaldReaganKing 3 ポイント4 ポイント5 ポイント 3 日前 (0子コメント)

[–]TheCreepero 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント 9 時間前 (0子コメント)

[–]RonaldReaganKing 3 ポイント4 ポイント5 ポイント 3 日前 (0子コメント)

[–]Nixon_Cranium 3 ポイント4 ポイント5 ポイント 3 日前 (0子コメント)

[–]PresidentCleveland 1 ポイント2 ポイント3 ポイント 2 日前 (0子コメント)

[–]SpurdoBurdo 11 ポイント12 ポイント13 ポイント 3 日前 (0子コメント)

固定リンク

[–]justiyt 12 ポイント13 ポイント14 ポイント 3 日前 (7子コメント)

固定リンク

[–]itspronouncedfloorda 5 ポイント6 ポイント7 ポイント 3 日前 (5子コメント)

[–]junkiewithoutacause 3 ポイント4 ポイント5 ポイント 3 日前 (1子コメント)

[–]itspronouncedfloorda 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント 3 日前 (0子コメント)

[–]murderhuman 2 ポイント3 ポイント4 ポイント 3 日前 (1子コメント)

[–]itspronouncedfloorda 1 ポイント2 ポイント3 ポイント 3 日前 (0子コメント)

[–]Faryshta 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント 3 日前 (0子コメント)

[–]Ravanas 5 ポイント6 ポイント7 ポイント 3 日前 (0子コメント)

[–]therealdirtydan 18 ポイント19 ポイント20 ポイント 4 日前 (127子コメント)

固定リンク

[–]Amunium 2 ポイント3 ポイント4 ポイント 3 日前* (1子コメント)

[–]NuclearWookiee -1 ポイント0 ポイント1 ポイント 2 日前 (0子コメント)

[–]Nuke_Europe 13 ポイント14 ポイント15 ポイント 4 日前* (123子コメント)

I've actually seen that exact same moronic opinion spouted numerous times before by Europeans, Canadians, Australians, and others. You have to understand that, outside of the US, more or less everyone believes that anything they don't like should be banned by the government, whether it's smoking, burqas, child beauty pageants, advertisements that depict women with unrealistic body sizes, or just opinions that they find "not acceptable". Europeans expect the government to ban things that it disapproves of and they can't even imagine the government disapproving of something without banning it. So, when they see "hate speech" coming from the US, their natural response is to believe that the US government approves of "hate speech" since it's not banning it.

Pretty much everyone outside of the US firmly believes that "hate speech is not free speech" - even the staunchest "libertarians" and "free speech activists" outside of the US fully support "hate speech" laws. For example, at Britain's "Rally for Free Expression", "free speech activists" spoke about the need to ensure that "hate speech" remains outlawed. The concept of US-style free speech is absolutely unfathomable to Europeans and others.

Here are some more screenshots of non-Americans talking about America's freedom of speech:

http://i.imgur.com/y7tAUPd.png

http://i.imgur.com/MoB6rSX.png

http://i.imgur.com/hnpHqlW.png

http://i.imgur.com/zhhXp1l.png

http://i.imgur.com/rfCDDpN.png

http://i.imgur.com/xS2cmUm.png

http://i.imgur.com/DfKqJi8.png

http://i.imgur.com/wYARVBL.png

http://i.imgur.com/yDsKDm6.png

http://i.imgur.com/LufLjCw.png

http://i.imgur.com/ssaoels.png

http://i.imgur.com/n9URSmL.png

http://i.imgur.com/zHDvDtd.png

http://i.imgur.com/Xwyf5hb.png

http://i.imgur.com/UGoQn62.png

http://i.imgur.com/rvrzy2o.png

[–]totes_meta_bot 7 ポイント8 ポイント9 ポイント 3 日前 (0子コメント)

[–]Ravanas 17 ポイント18 ポイント19 ポイント 3 日前 (8子コメント)

[–]gowerskee 5 ポイント6 ポイント7 ポイント 3 日前 (1子コメント)

[–]Ravanas 2 ポイント3 ポイント4 ポイント 3 日前 (0子コメント)

[–]alphetasauce 3 ポイント4 ポイント5 ポイント 3 日前 (5子コメント)

[–]TheCreepero -1 ポイント0 ポイント1 ポイント 2 日前 (4子コメント)

[–]NuclearWookiee 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント 2 日前 (3子コメント)

[–]DrenDran 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント 1 日前 (0子コメント)

[–]TheCreepero -1 ポイント0 ポイント1 ポイント 1 日前 (1子コメント)

[–]NuclearWookiee -1 ポイント0 ポイント1 ポイント 1 日前 (0子コメント)

[–]rrrrrndm 5 ポイント6 ポイント7 ポイント 3 日前 (1子コメント)

[–]Shaella_ 2 ポイント3 ポイント4 ポイント 3 日前 (0子コメント)

[–]TheCreepero 7 ポイント8 ポイント9 ポイント 2 日前 (51子コメント)

[+]Emily_Americana[S] スコアが基準値未満のコメント-43 ポイント-42 ポイント-41 ポイント 2 日前* (50子コメント)

Not the same person as him, but Europe is a cancerous tumor on the asshole of civilization and I want nothing more than to watch it burn to the ground. Whereas the US sees no need to curtail speech since American society punishes racism on its own, Europe knows very well that its citizens are racist and wishes to prohibit them from electing another Hitler (although they're already doing that anyway):

http://geocurrents.info/cultural-geography/the-rapid-rise-of-the-xenophobic-right-in-contemporary-europe

http://www.aljazeera.com/programmes/peopleandpower/2013/05/201351674859600711.html

http://www.dw.de/italys-extreme-right-wing-on-the-rise/a-17216239

http://www.dw.de/neo-nazis-form-expanding-networks-beyond-national-borders/a-17104509

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-25082487

http://news.yahoo.com/far-expects-surge-french-local-elections-172631351.html;_ylt=AwrSyCOIaC9TSzkAFX_QtDMD

http://uk.reuters.com/article/2014/03/30/uk-hungary-vote-farright-idUKBREA2T04620140330

http://budapesttimes.hu/2013/07/18/students-give-jobbik-high-marks/

http://greece.greekreporter.com/2014/01/26/golden-dawn-spokesman-eyes-athens-mayors-seat/

http://www.worldbulletin.net/haber/125562/far-right-party-on-rise-in-sweden

http://www.jpost.com/International/Far-right-gains-worry-Jewish-community-in-France-346388

http://www.jpost.com/Jewish-World/Jewish-Features/MKs-say-anti-Semitism-in-Europe-could-turn-violent-336634

http://euobserver.com/eu-elections/123459

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/over-half-of-austrians-think-the-nazis-would-be-elected-if-the-party-was-readmitted-to-politics-8528218.html

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/12/15/world/europe/far-right-gains-as-syrians-reach-eastern-europe.html

http://www.timesofisrael.com/french-jews-too-afraid-to-put-kids-in-public-school/

Remind me again: when was the last time that Americans elected Nazis into power? Oh, right... never. Because Nazis are universally condemned in American society and we don't need to suppress their speech because we know very well that our population would never actually support them. Europe's pathetic attempts to force its vicious racism underground with Orwellian speech laws have, of course, only backfired as the far-right continues to surge all over the continent.

I honestly cannot wait until your entire worthless continent is raped and pillaged by Russia and ISIS while your house-of-cards economy comes crashing down at the same time. It's going to be glorious. Quite frankly, I'm very much sick of my tax money being used to protect you useless freeloaders via NATO. You're like a retarded child that America is tasked with protecting. Your continent is a pathetic joke and I eagerly look forward to its destruction.

[–]Selpnirp2 51 ポイント52 ポイント53 ポイント 2 日前 (13子コメント)

[–]slapknuts 6 ポイント7 ポイント8 ポイント 2 日前 (1子コメント)

[+]Emily_Americana[S] スコアが基準値未満のコメント-35 ポイント-34 ポイント-33 ポイント 2 日前 (10子コメント)

[–]Selpnirp2 13 ポイント14 ポイント15 ポイント 2 日前 (0子コメント)

[–]goldman_ct 5 ポイント6 ポイント7 ポイント 2 日前 (1子コメント)

[–]miuumiu 12 ポイント13 ポイント14 ポイント 2 日前 (5子コメント)

That's actually sad. Americans live in a shit economy, they have a society that is sick to the bone, they get screwed over by their politicians day to day, they live in an oligarchy where an extreme majority is on the losing end and at the same time they are constantly told that they live in the best country of the world. Brainwashing at its finest.

I guess that's what happens when you get this typical american low level public education, paired with poverty and non existence of any culture whatsoever.

But yes, we are so sad that we don't live in a society where people die of hunger and sickness while some Kardashians get Millions over a sex tape.

And it's Sooo hard to be able to walk around at night everywhere without having to be afraid. And don't get me started on our working conditions. I hate having so much vacation time. Shit, I really wish I could be some American cubicle slave, but our Government just doesn't let me.

[–]jdkeith 1 ポイント2 ポイント3 ポイント 2 時間前 (0子コメント)

[–]Emily_Americana[S] -3 ポイント-2 ポイント-1 ポイント 1 日前 (3子コメント)

[–]miuumiu 5 ポイント6 ポイント7 ポイント 1 日前 (1子コメント)

[–]jdkeith 1 ポイント2 ポイント3 ポイント 2 時間前 (0子コメント)

[–]totes_meta_bot 10 ポイント11 ポイント12 ポイント 2 日前 (5子コメント)

[+]nogodplease スコアが基準値未満のコメント-6 ポイント-5 ポイント-4 ポイント 2 日前 (4子コメント)

[–]Emily_Americana[S] -5 ポイント-4 ポイント-3 ポイント 1 日前 (2子コメント)

[–]Feurisson -2 ポイント-1 ポイント0 ポイント 1 日前 (1子コメント)

I hole-hardedly agree, but allow me to play doubles advocate here for a moment. For all intensive purposes I think you are wrong. In an age where false morals are a diamond dozen, true virtues are a blessing in the skies. We often put our false morality on a petal stool like a bunch of pre-Madonnas, but you all seem to be taking something very valuable for granite. So I ask of you to mustard up all the strength you can because it is a doggy dog world out there. Although there is some merit to what you are saying it seems like you have a huge ship on your shoulder. In your argument you seem to throw everything in but the kids Nsync, and even though you are having a feel day with this I am here to bring you back into reality. I have a sick sense when it comes to these types of things. It is almost spooky, because I cannot turn a blonde eye to these glaring flaws in your rhetoric. I have zero taller ants when it comes to people spouting out hate in the name of moral righteousness. You just need to remember what comes around is all around, and when supply and command fails you will be the first to go. Make my words, when you get down to brass stacks it doesn't take rocket appliances to get two dinosaurs stoned at once. It's clear who makes the pants in this relationship, and sometimes you just have to swallow your prize and accept the facts. You might have to come to this conclusion through denial and error but I swear on my mother's mating name that when you put the petal to the medal you will pass with flying carpets like it’s a peach of cake.

[–]Emily_Americana[S] -2 ポイント-1 ポイント0 ポイント 1 日前 (0子コメント)

Let me preface this by saying that I've been a memer since they first appeared on 4chan circa 2006 (ages ago in internet time). I remember refreshing /b/ all afternoon with the hope that someone would make a new meme. I was a memer back when Advice Dog was the only one and I still upvote every Advice Dog meme I see becasue of the fond rush of nostalgia it brings me. Nowadays, there are many thousand on quickmeme and other meme websites. I was a memer back before memegenerator was created (the first meme website) and I had to make them with MS Powerpoint or Paint. Speaking of meme websites, I was one of the first submitters to memebase.com and still have one of the top accounts there despite having migrated to reddit nearly 2 years ago. It was on 4chan and memebase where I cut my teeth creating memes, way before I had a reddit account and way before /r/adviceanimals was created in late 2010. Back before I could get any sort of points or even username recognition, I was creating memes as a clever and easily digestible way to reflect on society, relate some story to my audience, or just be funny.

Do you remember rich raven? No? I do. You probably don't remember depression dog, crazy girlfriend praying mantis, introspective pug, or friendzone Johnny either. I remember all of them. In fact, you have only submitted two posts to adviceanimals garnering a total of just 4 points and have not commented there any time recently. So please, respect my judgement regarding the direction of the subreddit and the integrity of posts I have held dear to my heart for nearly 7 years but you have no strong feelings for.

Thanks.

[–]bigxblack 9 ポイント10 ポイント11 ポイント 2 日前 (7子コメント)

[–]Emily_Americana[S] -4 ポイント-3 ポイント-2 ポイント 1 日前 (6子コメント)

[–]bigxblack 2 ポイント3 ポイント4 ポイント 1 日前 (5子コメント)

I don't even give a shit about the neo Nazi thing

If you think racism isn't an issue in america you're what wrong with your godforsaken country. There are racists in Europe, there are racists in Asia, there are racists in Africa, Australasian, South America, and there damn sure are racists in North America as well.

There are valid racist political groups in Europe? What about the subtle institutionalized racism in america? The difference is the Europeans are open about it, while the racists in america try to hide it, or they're just too ignorant to realize they're racist.

And as for your ethnicity, you're a rare case of being part of a minority so relatively small there isn't a ton of racism directed your way in comparison to other minorities. There aren't widely known stereotypes and prejudices.

Finally, for the record I'd like to state I am in fact not a retarded cunt.

[–]jdkeith 1 ポイント2 ポイント3 ポイント 2 時間前 (0子コメント)

[–]Emily_Americana[S] -3 ポイント-2 ポイント-1 ポイント 1 日前 (3子コメント)

The difference is the Europeans are open about it, while the racists in america try to hide it, or they're just too ignorant to realize they're racist.

Absolute bullshit. Allow me to repeat what I said before:

Whereas the US sees no need to curtail speech since American society punishes racism on its own, Europe knows very well that its citizens are racist and wishes to prohibit them from electing another Hitler (although they're already doing that anyway)

There is no Golden Dawn, Jobbik, Front National, Freedom Party, Sweden Democrats, Party for Freedom, or any other viable fascist party in the US. The closest thing is the tiny Constitution Party, which is a complete joke and is basically just a bunch of fundamentalist Christians who stand absolutely no chance of being elected.

And as for your ethnicity, you're a rare case of being part of a minority so relatively small there isn't a ton of racism directed your way in comparison to other minorities. There aren't widely known stereotypes and prejudices.

In other words, "you're not a TRUE minority". Absolute fucking bullshit once again. I'm brown, aren't I? That's more than enough of a reason for racists to hate me. When I visited Europe, I received racist abuse constantly. I never receive that kind of treatment anywhere in America - and I've been to the deep south.

[–]bigxblack 2 ポイント3 ポイント4 ポイント 1 日前 (2子コメント)

[–]Emily_Americana[S] -2 ポイント-1 ポイント0 ポイント 23 時間前 (1子コメント)

このスレッドの続きを見る

[–]dwair 5 ポイント6 ポイント7 ポイント 2 日前 (0子コメント)

[–]nazishark 3 ポイント4 ポイント5 ポイント 2 日前 (7子コメント)

[–]nogodplease -2 ポイント-1 ポイント0 ポイント 2 日前 (1子コメント)

[–]Emily_Americana[S] -2 ポイント-1 ポイント0 ポイント 1 日前 (4子コメント)

[–]nazishark 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント 1 日前 (3子コメント)

[–]Emily_Americana[S] -1 ポイント0 ポイント1 ポイント 23 時間前 (2子コメント)

[–]nazishark 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント 15 時間前 (1子コメント)

[–]Emily_Americana[S] -1 ポイント0 ポイント1 ポイント 14 時間前 (0子コメント)

[–]TheCreepero 6 ポイント7 ポイント8 ポイント 2 日前 (5子コメント)

[+]Emily_Americana[S] スコアが基準値未満のコメント-22 ポイント-21 ポイント-20 ポイント 2 日前 (4子コメント)

[–]qqqi 16 ポイント17 ポイント18 ポイント 2 日前 (1子コメント)

[–]TheCreepero 8 ポイント9 ポイント10 ポイント 2 日前 (0子コメント)

[–]jdkeith 1 ポイント2 ポイント3 ポイント 2 時間前 (0子コメント)

[–]Corona21 3 ポイント4 ポイント5 ポイント 2 日前 (0子コメント)

[–]Ratatosk123 1 ポイント2 ポイント3 ポイント 2 日前 (0子コメント)

[–]that_nagger_guy 4 ポイント5 ポイント6 ポイント 2 日前 (0子コメント)

You are a troll so I will treat you like one.

when was the last time that Americans elected Nazis into power? Oh, right... never.

Nazism was pretty much created with Hitler. Sure there were similar thoughts a hundred years before but that was not the same kind of Nazism we think of now when that word is used. Judging people over the politics of their countries is pretty stupid. Some things of Communism makes sense to me, most of it doesn't. But that doesn't mean I should judge Russians for it. They had it for a reason. Economic and Social reasons to name a few of them.

Saying that America is superior because they haven't elected Nazis is stupid. Your country was severely racist and had been for hundreds of years in the 1940s. Sure, you didn't put people into camps because of their skin color, oh wait, except that one time where you did. Atleast you didn't kill them though. So that's something.

Blaming the rise of Hitler on all of the 50 countries in Europe is also pretty stupid. America is one country. Europe is a series of many countries with different beliefs, politics and cultures.

Again, I know that you are a troll so me explaining all this to you is a waste of my time, but I needed to speak up.

[–]jdkeith 1 ポイント2 ポイント3 ポイント 2 時間前 (1子コメント)

[–]Emily_Americana[S] 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント 1 時間前 (0子コメント)

[–]Fornad 1 ポイント2 ポイント3 ポイント 3 日前 (0子コメント)

[–]capecodcaper 2 ポイント3 ポイント4 ポイント 3 日前* (4子コメント)

[–]Sir_Sack -1 ポイント0 ポイント1 ポイント 3 日前 (2子コメント)

[–][削除されました] 3 日前 (1子コメント)

[deleted]

[–]Sir_Sack 1 ポイント2 ポイント3 ポイント 3 日前 (0子コメント)

固定リンク

[–]Nuke_Europe -4 ポイント-3 ポイント-2 ポイント 3 日前 (0子コメント)

[–]Mizeak 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント 2 日前 (5子コメント)

[+]Emily_Americana[S] スコアが基準値未満のコメント-6 ポイント-5 ポイント-4 ポイント 2 日前 (4子コメント)

[–]Mizeak 2 ポイント3 ポイント4 ポイント 2 日前 (3子コメント)

[–]Emily_Americana[S] -5 ポイント-4 ポイント-3 ポイント 2 日前 (2子コメント)

[–]TheCreepero 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント 2 日前 (1子コメント)

[–]Emily_Americana[S] -1 ポイント0 ポイント1 ポイント 1 日前 (0子コメント)

From another Glenn Greenwald article:

People who advocate these laws somehow convince themselves that if they give the power to the government to prosecute people for expressing "hateful" or dangerous ideas, those laws will only be applied against ideas that they dislike. But that is never how laws work. And it is particularly mystifying to me that anyone who has watched our current administration and its followers in action, seizing every power they can get their hands on in order to control information and criminalize dissent, would think that it is a good idea ever to allow the government -- any government -- to punish people for their ideas and comments.

It's something that a European could never understand since it's based on logic rather than emotion.

Oh, and I'm a member of an ethnic minority myself (Samoan).

[–]ElectReaver 2 ポイント3 ポイント4 ポイント 3 日前* (33子コメント)

[–]Nuke_Europe 1 ポイント2 ポイント3 ポイント 3 日前* (20子コメント)

Absolute bullshit.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hate_speech#Sweden

http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/aug/22/swedish-artist-sentenced-racist-art-dan-park (artist given jail time in Sweden for making "racist" art)

http://www.friatider.se/talas-efter-att-ha-f-rnekat-f-rintelsen (man prosecuted in Sweden for Holocaust denial)

http://www.thenewamerican.com/world-news/europe/item/18116-new-swedish-law-criminalizes-anti-immigration-internet-speech

http://www.friatider.se/sd-politiker-d-ms-f-r-islamkritik (politician prosecuted in Sweden for posting rape statistics on Facebook)

http://www.thelocal.se/20140920/cops-reported-for-making-roma-comment

http://www.thelocal.se/20140821/swedish-artist-jailed-for-race-hate-pictures

http://www.thelocal.se/20130828/49902

And advocating violence IS protected speech in the US. See: Brandenburg v. Ohio.

EDIT: Downvoting me won't prove me wrong, /r/ShitAmericansSay. Keep your delicious butthurt tears flowing.

[–]autowikibot 2 ポイント3 ポイント4 ポイント 3 日前 (3子コメント)

Section 27. Sweden of article Hate speech:

Sweden prohibits hate speech, and defines it as publicly making statements that threaten or express disrespect for an ethnic group or similar group regarding their race, skin colour, national or ethnic origin, faith, or sexual orientation. The crime does not prohibit a pertinent and responsible debate (en saklig och vederhäftig diskussion), nor statements made in a completely private sphere. There are constitutional restrictions pertaining to which acts are criminalized, as well limits set by the European Convention on Human Rights.

^Interesting: ^Hate ^speech ^laws ⁱⁿ ^India ^| ^Criticism ^of ^Facebook ^| ^Hate ^speech ^laws ⁱⁿ ^Canada ^| ^Hate ^speech ^laws ⁱⁿ ^Australia

^Parent ^commenter ^can ^toggle ^NSFW ^or ^delete^. ^Will ^also ^delete ^on ^comment ^score ^of ^-1 ^or ^less. ^| ^FAQs ^| ^Mods ^| ^Magic ^Words

[–]Death_to_SJWs 5 ポイント6 ポイント7 ポイント 2 日前* (2子コメント)

[–]junipertreebush 2 ポイント3 ポイント4 ポイント 2 日前 (1子コメント)

[–]Death_to_SJWs 1 ポイント2 ポイント3 ポイント 1 日前 (0子コメント)

[–]TheCreepero 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント 2 日前 (0子コメント)

[–]ElectReaver 2 ポイント3 ポイント4 ポイント 3 日前 (11子コメント)

Did you even read what you cited?

This test has been modified very little from its inception in 1969 and the formulation is still good law in the United States. Only speech that poses an imminent danger of unlawful action, where the speaker has the intention to incite such action and there is the likelihood that this will be the consequence of his or her speech, may be restricted and punished by that law.

In R.A.V. v. City of St. Paul, (1992), the issue of freedom to express hatred arose again when a gang of white racists burned a cross in the front yard of a black family. The local ordinance in St. Paul, Minnesota, criminalized such racist and hate-filled expressions and the teenager was charged thereunder

You are also citing Dan Park several times to make it look like you have more examples then you actually do. But nevertheless, Dan Parks is an interesting case. His art is things like painting prominent people who campaign for equality of people of color with nooses around their necks, which is very borderline a threat.

Then you cite things like police officers being reported for calling people Roma, which I find odd. How is that important? There was a news story recently of a man who took his bank to court because they granted him a loan he couldn't pay back... people take other people to court for the dumbest shit constantly.

[–]Nuke_Europe -1 ポイント0 ポイント1 ポイント 2 日前 (10子コメント)

[–]TheCreepero 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント 2 日前 (4子コメント)

[–]Nuke_Europe -1 ポイント0 ポイント1 ポイント 2 日前 (3子コメント)

[–]TheCreepero 2 ポイント3 ポイント4 ポイント 1 日前 (2子コメント)

[–]Nuke_Europe 1 ポイント2 ポイント3 ポイント 22 時間前 (0子コメント)

[+]Emily_Americana[S] スコアが基準値未満のコメント-7 ポイント-6 ポイント-5 ポイント 2 日前 (4子コメント)

[–]qqqi 2 ポイント3 ポイント4 ポイント 2 日前 (0子コメント)

[–]TheCreepero 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント 2 日前 (0子コメント)

[–]NIGERIAN_OIL_MONEY -1 ポイント0 ポイント1 ポイント 2 日前 (1子コメント)

[–]Nuke_Europe 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント 2 日前* (0子コメント)

[+]DominumVindicta スコアが基準値未満のコメント-6 ポイント-5 ポイント-4 ポイント 3 日前* (11子コメント)

[–]rrrrrndm 9 ポイント10 ポイント11 ポイント 3 日前* (6子コメント)

[–]DominumVindicta 2 ポイント3 ポイント4 ポイント 3 日前 (5子コメント)

The Nordic countries are a lot further down the feminazi train tracks than we are.

Here is an excellent documentary on the situation in Sweden titled "The Gender War". Shit gets dark.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yta55u2zP2U

They typically have official government funding for feminist research and political parties. Anti-male laws such as the legalization of providing sex i.e. prostitution. But the criminalization of buying sex i.e. the male customer. Also single mother rates are through the roof, but child custody typically defaults to the mother and father's rights groups are routinely stigmatized.

The legal definition of rape has been stretched so far as to be almost nonsensical. And the conviction rate for men has soared. You can see a recent example in the case of Julian Assange. Norway even has a gender parity law demanding that corporate boards be at least 40% female. That is amazing to me. Imagine being awarded a prestigious and high paying board position because of your genitalia.

http://www.avoiceformen.com/feminism/government-tyranny/the-radfem-conquest-of-sweden/

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yta55u2zP2U

http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/1b9i8p/feminist_journalists_spread_false_list_of/

Norway

http://www.aftenposten.no/amagasinet/Hvorfor-behandles-kvinner-mildere-7107802.html

When Ideology hits Reality: the end result of Norway's 40% female boards law.

http://webuser.bus.umich.edu/adittmar/NBD.SSRN.2011.05.20.pdf

http://www.the-spearhead.com/2013/03/29/antifeminism-might-become-illegal-in-the-nordic-countries/

And you are absolutely wrong about third wave feminism in Europe. You hardly hear anything about it on reddit because reddit is US centric. Not because it isn't there.

[–]TheCreepero -1 ポイント0 ポイント1 ポイント 2 日前 (4子コメント)

[–]Nuke_Europe -2 ポイント-1 ポイント0 ポイント 1 日前 (3子コメント)

[–]TheCreepero 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント 1 日前 (2子コメント)

[–]Nuke_Europe 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント 22 時間前 (0子コメント)

[–]ElectReaver 2 ポイント3 ポイント4 ポイント 3 日前 (2子コメント)

[–]UsesMemesAtWrongTime 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント 2 日前 (1子コメント)

[–]ElectReaver 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント 2 日前 (0子コメント)

[–]iownacat 1 ポイント2 ポイント3 ポイント 3 日前 (4子コメント)

[–]Nuke_Europe 4 ポイント5 ポイント6 ポイント 3 日前 (3子コメント)

it sounds like the same couple of jackasses, or just trolls...

It's not. The views expressed in the screenshots that I posted would be considered "centrist" - if not "libertarian" - in other countries.

For example: http://thoughtcatalog.com/joshua-goldberg/2014/08/why-hate-speech-laws-have-more-in-common-with-fascism-than-democracy/

The idea of slightly changing federal “hate speech” laws was considered to be completely outrageous by almost everyone in the country, with numerous politicians, journalists, pundits, online commentators, artists, authors, columnists, and others speaking out about the need for strict “hate speech” law enforcement.

A poll indicated that 88% of Australians believed that all racist speech should be illegal and people even marched against the proposed changes.

The UN and the "human rights" lobby just successfully lobbied Japan to outlaw "hate speech" too, with thousands of people participating in the "March on Tokyo for Freedom" demanding that the Japanese government outlaw "hate speech". Numerous politicians on all sides have demanded legal restrictions on "hate speech" in Japan, saying that Japan is behind the rest of the world in "human rights" because it lacks "hate speech" laws. And, according to Japanese politician Sanae Takaichi, new "hate speech" laws should be used against people who protest the government because lawmakers need to work "without any fear of criticism".

[–]iownacat 1 ポイント2 ポイント3 ポイント 3 日前 (2子コメント)

[–]TheCreepero -1 ポイント0 ポイント1 ポイント 2 日前 (1子コメント)

[–]iownacat 3 ポイント4 ポイント5 ポイント 2 日前 (0子コメント)

[–]subtleshill 1 ポイント2 ポイント3 ポイント 3 日前 (0子コメント)

[–]anarchism4thewin 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント 2 日前* (1子コメント)

[–]Selpnirp2 1 ポイント2 ポイント3 ポイント 2 日前 (0子コメント)

[–]Abdicator 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント 3 日前 (0子コメント)

[–]anarchism4thewin 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント 3 日前 (0子コメント)

I've actually seen that exact same moronic opinion spouted numerous times before by Europeans, Canadians, Australians, and others. You have to understand that, outside of the US, more or less everyone believes that anything they don't like should be banned by the government, whether it's smoking, burqas, child beauty pageants, advertisements that depict women with unrealistic body sizes, or just opinions that they find "not acceptable"[1] . Europeans expect the government to ban things that it disapproves of and they can't even imagine the government disapproving of something without banning it. So, when they see "hate speech" coming from the US, their natural response is to believe that the US government approves of "hate speech" since it's not banning it.

Yeah, fuck you too racist asshole. As with everything else, some "europeans" (The differences in public opinion between different countries in Europe is so large that to generalise is redicilous, but i don't expect you to understand that) support restrictions on freedom of speech, others don't. And of course there are people in the United States who support restrictions on freedom of speech. Unbelievable that someone would generalise people based on the laws and government in that country.

I can't believe this was upvoted. This is stuff you would usually find in /r/ShitAmericansSay

10/10 you rustled my jimmies.

[–]MRB2012 -2 ポイント-1 ポイント0 ポイント 3 日前 (0子コメント)

I've actually seen that exact same moronic opinion spouted numerous times before by Europeans, Canadians, Australians, and others. You have to understand that, outside of the US, more or less everyone believes that anything they don't like should be banned by the government, whether it's smoking, burqas, child beauty pageants, advertisements that depict women with unrealistic body sizes, or just opinions that they find "not acceptable". Europeans expect the government to ban things that it disapproves of and they can't even imagine the government disapproving of something without banning it. So, when they see "hate speech" coming from the US, their natural response is to believe that the US government approves of "hate speech" since it's not banning it.

There's a reason totalitarian governments have risen to power so many times in Europe and not in the US.

[–]totes_meta_bot -1 ポイント0 ポイント1 ポイント 2 日前 (0子コメント)