あなたは単独のコメントのスレッドを見ています。

残りのコメントをみる →

[–]kantbot 19 ポイント20 ポイント  (9子コメント)

Social Justice is the real issue, it's naive to think otherwise, or maybe you just haven't been paying attention over the last few years. It's all about control and power. Over the last decade technology, video games and the internet have developed into huge industries and there has been a concerted effort to check their increasing cultural and political independence with articles like this. That isn't Kotaku, it's the New York Times, and people who try to keep this about 'journalistic ethics' are off the mark I'm afraid.

[–]kamon123 3 ポイント4 ポイント  (7子コメント)

When gamergate started you would be the top comment.

[–]kantbot 6 ポイント7 ポイント  (6子コメント)

I imagine it's like what happened to /r/tia, there's a lot of anxiety among certain groups of younger, more politically 'savvy' sorts to embrace radical moderation or 'centrism.' There's a meme that goes "the right has moved farther to the right in recent years while the more reasonable left has remained closer to the center," I've never been a fan of that sort of thing because the other possibility never occurs to people, that it's the middle that's changed positions.

Appeals to moderation have been used very successfully elsewhere, in subs like /r/tia to neuter criticism of Social Justice and Feminism. The 'crazies' on /r/tia aren't 'real Feminists,' and all the sociological concepts and constructions of progressivism must ultimately be upheld by any rational person as completely valid. If you disagree, if you see SJWs not as a cause, but as a symptom, if you understand them, like morbidly obese individuals gorged on fast food, not as moral agents but as moral consumers of a toxic ideology, you are not sufficiently moderate.

Social justice is a poisonous ideology that has had a negative impact on our world beyond games journalism over the last decade or so. As Schlegel said, "moderation is the spirit of castrated narrow-mindedness".

[–]kamon123 3 ポイント4 ポイント  (2子コメント)

Mind helping me in the comments fellow old school TiAer. I'm all alone in here with 2 or 3 users. They can't seem to handle I'm fine with feminist reviews but not sjw ones. Also this post is front page next to another call to moderation post.

[–]kantbot 4 ポイント5 ポイント  (1子コメント)

I don't think most Feminists are 'real' Feminists. Their beliefs don't really go beyond nebulous statements like "men and women are equal." I don't think women were ever really 'oppressed' by men, I think that's a false, entirely subjective narrative and one could easily construct a theory of the matriarchy and say that men have been socialized throughout history to sacrifice for the comfort of women. Neither narrative is ultimately more or less true than the other, both are subjective narratizations of historical content.

In truth I think most men throughout history are 'feminists,' in the sense that they all loved and cherished and treated very well the women in their lives. A Feminist to me is something else, TERFs, for example are 'true' Feminists in my eyes, because they carry the theoretical dogmas of philosophical Feminism to their logical conclusion.

It's like Jacobi's point about Enlightenment Rationalism inevitably collapsing into nihilistic solipsism.

[–]Mr_Shine [非表示スコア]  (0子コメント)

...I don't think women were ever really 'oppressed' by men, I think that's a false, entirely subjective narrative...

What is this

I don't even

What

Women not being able to inherit property, wealth, businesses or political titles throughout much of history? They couldn't vote or hold office for the first 150 years of the United States' existence?

Please expand on what you've stated here, I feel like you've left out some very critical details of your post or simply misspoke.

[–]thedarkerside -1 ポイント0 ポイント  (2子コメント)

There's a meme that goes "the right has moved farther to the right in recent years while the more reasonable left has remained closer to the center,"

Which is a stupid meme, because society works like scales, if one side gets heavier, so does the other.

But it's a convenient excuse to be an asshole to the other side and feel smug about it.

[–]LWMR [非表示スコア]  (1子コメント)

Which is a stupid meme, because society works like scales, if one side gets heavier, so does the other.

This is a stupid assertion. There is no guarantee that a society will be balanced. It can happen, true, but while (for example) the American Left moved from civil unions to gay marriages to the right to have businesses help out with your gay marriage and from there to reeducation for business owners who refuse, the American Right moved... well, last I checked, they were roughly at the point of being on board with civil unions, a formerly left position. The right definitely didn't move several steps right to stoning and burning gays in response to the left moving left.

[–]thedarkerside [非表示スコア]  (0子コメント)

I am not claiming it will balance. I am claiming it will attempt to balance itself.

History of course shows us that we will never be in complete balance because the people at the edge will always try to tilt things more towards their goal, so it's a constant back and forth.

If you like it better: Society works like a sea-saw.

[–]TheCodexx [非表示スコア]  (0子コメント)

Expose the corrupt journalists and the people pulling their strings. If Social Justice is the "real" problem, it's going to have a big gaping wound where its PR department used to be.

Take down the beast by cutting its achilles tendon. Don't try to cut the tendon by killing the beat, first.