全ての 30 コメント

[–]lo_there[S] 56 ポイント57 ポイント  (4子コメント)

Brown's friend that lied and started the whole race frenzy should be brought up on charges.

[–]8_Bit_Armada 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (3子コメント)

What did he claim? I'm out of the loop, sorry.

[–]lo_there[S] [非表示スコア]  (1子コメント)

[–]8_Bit_Armada [非表示スコア]  (0子コメント)

How does such a large person not get away from a one handed front choke hold?

[–]captain_craptain [非表示スコア]  (0子コメント)

Dat dey didn't do nuffin'

[–]DrMussintouchit 27 ポイント28 ポイント  (2子コメント)

There are still going to be riots when he is not indicted. Al Sharpton and the other idiots will slowly slink away.

[–]Nostratamus 28 ポイント29 ポイント  (1子コメント)

No Sharpton will be driven away in his Rolls Royce-Phantom with a sack full of money.

[–]diversity_is_racism 5 ポイント6 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Probably both.

[–]ayePALINDROMEeyeLibertarian Conservative 25 ポイント26 ポイント  (3子コメント)

Just imagine how much safer our streets would be if we had 100,000 Darren Wilsons.

[–]narcedmonkey 24 ポイント25 ポイント  (1子コメント)

the streets are already safer with Brown off them.

[–]diversity_is_racism 11 ポイント12 ポイント  (0子コメント)

I bet the shopkeeper who got beat up in the robbery thinks so.

[–]zarus 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (0子コメント)

It's enough to clean up the streets and not enough to implement Communism-style oppression. I say go for it.

[–]cowboyhazeConservative 23 ポイント24 ポイント  (0子コメント)

So sick of this being dragged out. The cop did his job.

[–]krunchTaste 12 ポイント13 ポイント  (13子コメント)

Okay, so:

"The officer, Darren Wilson, has told the authorities that during the scuffle, Mr. Brown reached for the gun. It was fired twice in the car, according to forensics tests performed by the Federal Bureau of Investigation. The first bullet struck Mr. Brown in the arm; the second bullet missed.

The forensics tests showed Mr. Brown’s blood on the gun, as well as on the interior door panel and on Officer Wilson’s uniform. Officer Wilson told the authorities that Mr. Brown had punched and scratched him repeatedly, leaving swelling on his face and cuts on his neck." (Source)

If we believe those who say Officer Wilson was guilty of murder (and not self-defense), how do we explain a gun firing twice inside the Officer's car, and Darren's blood on the interior door panel of the car (both according to FBI forensic tests)? That's a hard obstacle to overcome, it clearly points to a struggle over Officer Wilson's gun, and places Darren reaching inside the car (also corroborates the Officer's testimony).

[–]Mybrainmelts 11 ポイント12 ポイント  (0子コメント)

easy, the cops planted it there. /s

[–]MiyegomboBayartsogtSupporter 6 ポイント7 ポイント  (0子コメント)

The reprobate's lawyer was on CNN this morning. The desparate lawyer says poor lil' Mike was in the street bopping along when suddenly the racist cop nearly ran him down. Then the police officer reached out of the SUV and grabbed the gentle giant and tried to pull the innocent pedestrian into the vehicle through the window while shooting him. Mike broke free and ran but the cop then shot him in the back but somehow, the tests aren't in yet to show exactly how, the bullets all struck him in the front because he had his hands up to surrender. It could have happened.

[–]Gstreetshit 3 ポイント4 ポイント  (2子コメント)

and Darren's blood on the interior door panel of the car

its was Brown's blood, not Darren's. Unless I've completely misunderstood.

[–][削除されました]  (1子コメント)

[deleted]

    [–]Gstreetshit 3 ポイント4 ポイント  (0子コメント)

    The first bullet struck Mr. Brown in the arm

    No

    [–]diversity_is_racism 8 ポイント9 ポイント  (0子コメント)

    It's racist to notice these things. It's racist to notice that civil rights and anti-poverty are essentially programs to destroy the white middle class and transfer their wealth to the New Democrats.

    [–]Unheard 4 ポイント5 ポイント  (1子コメント)

    Ahh the race baiters. Never letting the facts get in the way of their lies.

    [–]Slowhand09 [非表示スコア]  (0子コメント)

    Will somebody else please shoot someone. I feel like burning and looting some more.

    [–]baldyloxRight Social Libertarian [非表示スコア]  (0子コメント)

    Just out of curiosity ... where was this evidence the day after the shooting? Surely an investigation had already revealed these facts after 24 hours, no? Why wait a couple months?