WendyMcElroy.com

Re: How to Last During Lovemaking Like a True Sex-God Stud

Okay, one, I've met a guy who had experienced multiple orgasms, I don't remember his name but it was not Richard, and he did not mention ever having learned your technique.

Two, I think if you tried to have an orgasm indefinitely you'd end up in the emergency room after a few hours.

Re: How to Last During Lovemaking Like a True Sex-God Stud

Okay, one, I've met a guy who had experienced multiple orgasms, I don't remember his name but it was not Richard, and he did not mention ever having learned your technique.

Two, I think if you tried to have an orgasm indefinitely you'd end up in the emergency room after a few hours.

People are getting upset with me for having mentioned a veridical technique men can use to last indefinitely while having sex, i.e., to have multiple full orgasms with ejaculations.

Either use the technique, or don't use it. But don't make me out to be a bad person because I told you how to do it.

Regarding your friend who was not Richard, I know nothing about him, and I don't care. So he came multiple times. Great for him.

Re: How to Last During Lovemaking Like a True Sex-God Stud

Since Richard Brent has experienced genuine male multiple orgasms with no refractory period since he first started masturbating as a child, he is unaware of what he is doing that almost all other males are not doing in order to achieve this result. Because of this he has no advice to offer as to techniques men can use in order to achieve the same result (see, e.g., "Q & A" http://www.multiorgasmic.com/q&a.htm , http://webcitation.org/6M3zFiz5F ).

James, I must insist that you cease telling others of that which you have single-handedly (pun?) determined I am unaware.  I know exactly what it is I experience and what I have always experienced throughout my life, which I scientifically demonstrated almost 20 years ago at Rutgers College of Nursing.  And at no time either during that study nor at any time before or since have I ever employed any pubococcygeus (PC) muscle techniques or any other cognitive technique in experiencing natural multiple orgasms (with full ejaculation and continued erection and capacity each time to continue). 

Any taught technique is cognitive in nature by very definition and application, requiring its deliberate voluntary employment at a learned recognizable key moment in order to interrupt what would otherwise naturally occur.  In my case, what naturally occurs does not need to be interrupted.  Thus, there is nothing needed to "learn" and, thus, nothing I can teach others... and that is the reason why I have never attempted to teach any such.  In my case, it's simply how I was born and how I have always been. 

In the future, I shall expect you to cease claiming to teach that which I naturally experience.  To do so is to perpetrate a deliberate fraud and a potentially actionable one.  Obviously, you are welcome to teach and promulgate your claimed technique all you like... so long as you do so without any reference to me or claiming to teach that which I experience.     

Thank you,

Richard Brent
Research Subject
"Male Multiple Ejaculatory Orgasms:  A Case Study"
JSET  Vol. 23, No. 2

Re: How to Last During Lovemaking Like a True Sex-God Stud

Mr. Brent --- Mr. Redford has long since left this forum in a huff, so the odds are high that he will never see your comment.

If you should happen to revisit this thread, I'd very much appreciate it if you'd take a few moments to fix the quote tags in your post so as to remove the spurious tag that incorrectly attributes Mr. Redford's words to me, since I have absolutely no desire to be associated with either Mr. Redford or his words, in any way or form, even by spurious appearance. Thanks in advance, --/gdp   [<== The moderator has resolved the issue; Thanks! --/gdp]

Re: How to Last During Lovemaking Like a True Sex-God Stud

Fixed it for you.

Re: How to Last During Lovemaking Like a True Sex-God Stud

Can I laugh now?

Re: How to Last During Lovemaking Like a True Sex-God Stud

Fixed it for you.

Thanks!  I will strike out my request to Mr. Brent.

Re: How to Last During Lovemaking Like a True Sex-God Stud

Quote from: James Redford on February 10, 2014, 02:06:48 PM

Since Richard Brent has experienced genuine male multiple orgasms with no refractory period since he first started masturbating as a child, he is unaware of what he is doing that almost all other males are not doing in order to achieve this result. Because of this he has no advice to offer as to techniques men can use in order to achieve the same result (see, e.g., "Q & A" http://www.multiorgasmic.com/q&a.htm , http://webcitation.org/6M3zFiz5F ).

James, I must insist that you cease telling others of that which you have single-handedly (pun?) determined I am unaware.  I know exactly what it is I experience and what I have always experienced throughout my life, which I scientifically demonstrated almost 20 years ago at Rutgers College of Nursing.  And at no time either during that study nor at any time before or since have I ever employed any pubococcygeus (PC) muscle techniques or any other cognitive technique in experiencing natural multiple orgasms (with full ejaculation and continued erection and capacity each time to continue). 

Any taught technique is cognitive in nature by very definition and application, requiring its deliberate voluntary employment at a learned recognizable key moment in order to interrupt what would otherwise naturally occur.  In my case, what naturally occurs does not need to be interrupted.  Thus, there is nothing needed to "learn" and, thus, nothing I can teach others... and that is the reason why I have never attempted to teach any such.  In my case, it's simply how I was born and how I have always been. 

In the future, I shall expect you to cease claiming to teach that which I naturally experience.  To do so is to perpetrate a deliberate fraud and a potentially actionable one.  Obviously, you are welcome to teach and promulgate your claimed technique all you like... so long as you do so without any reference to me or claiming to teach that which I experience.     

Thank you,

Richard Brent
Research Subject
"Male Multiple Ejaculatory Orgasms:  A Case Study"
JSET  Vol. 23, No. 2

I thank you, Richard Brent, for confirming my comments on my InfiniLast technique, previously styled my InfiniFuck technique: of which it occurred to me that the term "InfiniFuck" might be thought of as indecorous to some, hence my reason for restyling it my InfiniLast technique.

You above confirmed precisely what I wrote regarding my InfiniLast technique. You said above:

""
And at no time either during that study nor at any time before or since have I ever employed any pubococcygeus (PC) muscle techniques or any other cognitive technique in experiencing natural multiple orgasms (with full ejaculation and continued erection and capacity each time to continue). 
""

As I said:

""
Since Richard Brent has experienced genuine male multiple orgasms with no refractory period since he first started masturbating as a child, he is unaware of what he is doing that almost all other males are not doing in order to achieve this result. Because of this he has no advice to offer as to techniques men can use in order to achieve the same result (see, e.g., "Q & A" http://www.multiorgasmic.com/q&a.htm , http://webcitation.org/6M3zFiz5F ).
""

And as I also went on to write:

""
The more one works at this the easier it becomes. So easy, in fact, that once one becomes proficient at this one is unlikely to notice any additional effort needed in maintaining an erection after an ejaculation while continuing to have sex.
""

With myself, I learned my InfiniLast technique with my then-girlfriend Rhonda by Providence. It just happened one night. She was riding my erect penis, yet I never went soft, even though I ejaculated into her multiple times without any form of prophylactic--or "bareback", as the commoners say. It was nothing conscious on my part.

You go on to write:

""
Any taught technique is cognitive in nature by very definition and application, requiring its deliberate voluntary employment at a learned recognizable key moment in order to interrupt what would otherwise naturally occur.
""

I was "taught" my InfiniLast technique by God Himself. The reason God chose to impart it to me is because He knew that I could be counted upon to impart it to others.

And as I said, this just happened one night. There was no "teaching" involved with me acquiring this capability. Yet because I was used to the usual refractory period that almost all males experience after orgasm, I was able to understand what was occurring regarding the physicality of my body that was different than the previous standard refractory period after orgasm. Whereas you have always experienced no refractory period after orgasm, and hence, as you stated, you have no advice to offer regarding this matter.

Well, thankfully for the rest of humanity (even for lesbians and asexuals, by making the rest of the world happier people), I do know how to achieve multiple male orgasms with no refractory period, and I have successfully taught this to other males.

Regarding your absurd requests of me: I request that you convert to Christianity and thereby become a decent human being whose soul (i.e., the computer program of one's mind) is saved. Your false accusation of "fraud" against me is a phantasm of your mind, as you verified precisely what I wrote concerning my InfiniLast technique vis-à-vis you. Further, I make no money off of anything I write, let alone my InfiniLast technique. I gave the entire technique. And that all for free. I didn't post this as a hook to reel people in to buy something I'm selling, as I have nothing for sell. So your false accusation of "fraud" is doubly-wrong: it's wrong because you verified that what I said about you is correct; and it's wrong because I'm not selling anything.

In order to facilitate your transition into Christianity, if you should so wisely choose to do so, see my following article on physicist and mathematician Prof. Frank J. Tipler's Omega Point cosmology, which is a proof (i.e., mathematical theorem) of God's existence per the known laws of physics (viz., the Second Law of Thermodynamics, General Relativity, and Quantum Mechanics), and the Feynman-DeWitt-Weinberg quantum gravity/Standard Model Theory of Everything (TOE), which is also required by said known physical laws. The Omega Point cosmology has been published and extensively peer-reviewed in leading physics journals.

James Redford, "The Physics of God and the Quantum Gravity Theory of Everything", Social Science Research Network (SSRN), Sept. 10, 2012 (orig. pub. Dec. 19, 2011), 186 pp., doi:10.2139/ssrn.1974708; PDF, 1741424 bytes, MD5: 8f7b21ee1e236fc2fbb22b4ee4bbd4cb, http://ssrn.com/abstract=1974708 , http://archive.org/download/ThePhysicsOfGodAndTheQuantumGravityTheoryOfEverything/Redford-Physics-of-God.pdf , http://theophysics.host56.com/Redford-Physics-of-God.pdf , http://alphaomegapoint.files.wordpress.com/2013/03/redford-physics-of-god.pdf , http://sites.google.com/site/physicotheism/home/Redford-Physics-of-God.pdf .

My foregoing article further provides an examination of the globalist political power-elite: history is given on their organizational structure and their methods of accumulating power; and analysis is given on where they're attempting to take the world, i.e., their self-termed New World Order world government and world religion.

The article furnishes documentation on what the globalist oligarchy's ultimate goal is. This ultimate goal of theirs most popularly goes by the name of transhumanism: immortality through technology. However, I explain in the article that the coming radical life-extension technologies create a fundamental dilemma for the oligarchs, which is why they must dominate world society before such technology becomes a reality. The details of that dilemma are explained in Sec. 8.2.2: "The Mark of the Beast" of the article.

Thus, this article explains to people what is to occur and why it is to occur, so that they will not be in ignorance as to the events that are to unfold.

Additionally, in the below resource are six sections which contain very informative videos of Prof. Tipler explaining the Omega Point cosmology and the Feynman-DeWitt-Weinberg quantum gravity/Standard Model TOE. The seventh section therein contains an audio interview of Tipler. I also provide some helpful notes and commentary for some of these videos.

James Redford, "Video of Profs. Frank Tipler and Lawrence Krauss's Debate at Caltech: Can Physics Prove God and Christianity?", alt.sci.astro, Message-ID: jghev8tcbv02b6vn3uiq8jmelp7jijluqk@4ax.com , 30 Jul 2013 00:51:55 -0400, https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.sci.astro/KQWt4KcpMVo , http://archive.today/a04w9 , http://webcitation.org/6IUTAMEyS . The plain text of this post is available at: TXT, 42423 bytes, MD5: b199e867e42d54b2b8bf6adcb4127761, http://mirrorcreator.com/files/JCFTZSS8/ , http://ge.tt/3lOTVbp .

Re: How to Last During Lovemaking Like a True Sex-God Stud

For the record, contrasting to Redford's "request" that Brent "convert to christianity" so that "his computer program will be saved," Frank Tipler is a "Universalist" who believes that a "benevolent" Omega-Point would save, resurrect, and reemulate the mental state of EVERY sentient being, regardless of whether or not they "convert to christianity."

So Redford has therefore falsely imputed and imported elements of the "Abrahamic" narcissistic psychopathic vengeful tyrant god into Tipler's concept of a basically "benevolent" Omega-Point, in sharp contrast to Tipler's own beliefs.

Re: How to Last During Lovemaking Like a True Sex-God Stud

For the record, contrasting to Redford's "request" that Brent "convert to christianity" so that "his computer program will be saved," Frank Tipler is a "Universalist" who believes that a "benevolent" Omega-Point would save, resurrect, and reemulate the mental state of EVERY sentient being, regardless of whether or not they "convert to christianity."

So Redford has therefore falsely imputed and imported elements of the "Abrahamic" narcissistic psychopathic vengeful tyrant god into Tipler's concept of a basically "benevolent" Omega-Point, in sharp contrast to Tipler's own beliefs.

wouldn't you have to resurrect all sentient beings if you're going to recreate the universe from the beginning? All pool balls have to be on the table to simulate the shot.

Re: How to Last During Lovemaking Like a True Sex-God Stud

For the record, contrasting to Redford's "request" that Brent "convert to christianity" so that "his computer program will be saved," Frank Tipler is a "Universalist" who believes that a "benevolent" Omega-Point would save, resurrect, and reemulate the mental state of EVERY sentient being, regardless of whether or not they "convert to christianity."

So Redford has therefore falsely imputed and imported elements of the "Abrahamic" narcissistic psychopathic vengeful tyrant god into Tipler's concept of a basically "benevolent" Omega-Point, in sharp contrast to Tipler's own beliefs.

Hi, Gdp.

Regarding his Omega Point cosmology, even before his conversion to Christianity, physicist and mathematician Prof. Frank J. Tipler has always maintained (as with Paul as recorded in Acts 24:15) that the universal resurrection of the dead will be just that: of both the wicked and the saint. In Tipler's book The Physics of Immortality: Modern Cosmology, God and the Resurrection of the Dead (New York: Doubleday, 1994), which was written before Tipler realized the fundamentally triune structure of the cosmological singularity and also before Tipler realized how the miracles surrounding Yeshua's Incarnation and ministry are perfectly allowed within the known laws of physics, Tipler wrote about how--if the Omega Point cosmology is in fact correct--the far-future immortal beings who perform the general resurrection of the dead will decide what rewards or punishments individuals receive upon the universal resurrection. Indeed, this book was written before Tipler even converted to theism, as this was before Tipler formulated the Omega Point cosmology as a mathematical theorem per the known laws of physics (viz., the Second Law of Thermodynamics, General Relativity, and Quantum Mechanics) circa 1997. (See p. 305 of The Physics of Immortality regarding Tipler still being an atheist because he didn't at the time have confirmation for the Omega Point Theory, which is now the Omega Point Theorem per the known physical laws.)

For much more regarding this issue, see Sec. 7.4.4: "The Soteriology of Existence", pp. 50-53, particularly footnote 130 on pp. 52-53, of my following article:

James Redford, "The Physics of God and the Quantum Gravity Theory of Everything", Social Science Research Network (SSRN), Sept. 10, 2012 (orig. pub. Dec. 19, 2011), 186 pp., doi:10.2139/ssrn.1974708; PDF, 1741424 bytes, MD5: 8f7b21ee1e236fc2fbb22b4ee4bbd4cb, http://ssrn.com/abstract=1974708 , http://archive.org/download/ThePhysicsOfGodAndTheQuantumGravityTheoryOfEverything/Redford-Physics-of-God.pdf , http://theophysics.host56.com/Redford-Physics-of-God.pdf , http://alphaomegapoint.files.wordpress.com/2013/03/redford-physics-of-god.pdf , http://sites.google.com/site/physicotheism/home/Redford-Physics-of-God.pdf .

Re: How to Last During Lovemaking Like a True Sex-God Stud

Well darn you must be right cause you quoted yourself.

Re: How to Last During Lovemaking Like a True Sex-God Stud

Quote from: gdp on Today at 08:41:05 AM

For the record, contrasting to Redford's "request" that Brent "convert to christianity" so that "his computer program will be saved," Frank Tipler is a "Universalist" who believes that a "benevolent" Omega-Point would save, resurrect, and reemulate the mental state of EVERY sentient being, regardless of whether or not they "convert to christianity."

So Redford has therefore falsely imputed and imported elements of the "Abrahamic" narcissistic psychopathic vengeful tyrant god into Tipler's concept of a basically "benevolent" Omega-Point, in sharp contrast to Tipler's own beliefs.

wouldn't you have to resurrect all sentient beings if you're going to recreate the universe from the beginning? All pool balls have to be on the table to simulate the shot.

Correct. I touch on this subject in various places within my "Physics of God" article, but particularly see under the heading "The Two Different Resurrections", pp. 108-110, therein. Vis.:

James Redford, "The Physics of God and the Quantum Gravity Theory of Everything", Social Science Research Network (SSRN), Sept. 10, 2012 (orig. pub. Dec. 19, 2011), 186 pp., doi:10.2139/ssrn.1974708; PDF, 1741424 bytes, MD5: 8f7b21ee1e236fc2fbb22b4ee4bbd4cb, http://ssrn.com/abstract=1974708 , http://archive.org/download/ThePhysicsOfGodAndTheQuantumGravityTheoryOfEverything/Redford-Physics-of-God.pdf , http://theophysics.host56.com/Redford-Physics-of-God.pdf , http://alphaomegapoint.files.wordpress.com/2013/03/redford-physics-of-god.pdf , http://sites.google.com/site/physicotheism/home/Redford-Physics-of-God.pdf .

Re: How to Last During Lovemaking Like a True Sex-God Stud

Well darn you must be right cause you quoted yourself.

My article "The Physics of God and the Quantum Gravity Theory of Everything", which is 186 pages in 8.5*11 inch format, uses the Scholarly Method extensively, with 490 entries in the Bibliography and 330 footnotes. And physicist and mathematician Prof. Frank J. Tipler's Omega Point cosmology has been peer-reviewed and published in a number of the world's leading physics and science journals.[1] Even NASA itself has peer-reviewed his Omega Point Theorem and found it correct according to the known laws of physics (see below). No refutation of it exists within the peer-reviewed scientific literature, or anywhere else for that matter.

Below are some of the peer-reviewed papers in physics and science journals and proceedings wherein Prof. Tipler has published his Omega Point cosmology. (The below papers, in addition to many other articles by Tipler on the Omega Point cosmology, are also available in the following archive: Frank-J-Tipler-Omega-Point-Papers.zip , 26712158 bytes, MD5: 6e5d29b994bc2f9aa4210d72ef37ab68, http://webcitation.org/6GjhT6t52 , https://amazon.com/clouddrive/share?s=bTI58F1dSAIjSrxJ26R7d8 , https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B7k4r80YepnxNjNOX2x0XzBOV00/edit .)

* Frank J. Tipler, "Cosmological Limits on Computation", International Journal of Theoretical Physics, Vol. 25, No. 6 (June 1986), pp. 617-661, doi:10.1007/BF00670475, bibcode: 1986IJTP...25..617T. (First paper on the Omega Point cosmology.) http://webcitation.org/64KHgOccs

* Frank J. Tipler, "The Sensorium of God: Newton and Absolute Space", bibcode: 1988nnds.conf..215T, in G[eorge]. V. Coyne, M[ichal]. Heller and J[ozef]. Zycinski (Eds.), "Message" by Franciszek Macharski, Newton and the New Direction in Science: Proceedings of the Cracow Conference, 25 to 28 May 1987 (Vatican City: Specola Vaticana, 1988), pp. 215-228, LCCN 88162460, bibcode: 1988nnds.conf.....C. http://webcitation.org/69Vb0JF1W

* Frank J. Tipler, "The Omega Point Theory: A Model of an Evolving God", in Robert J. Russell, William R. Stoeger and George V. Coyne (Eds.), message by John Paul II, Physics, Philosophy, and Theology: A Common Quest for Understanding (Vatican City: Vatican Observatory, 2nd ed., 2005; orig. pub. 1988), pp. 313-331, ISBN 0268015775, LCCN 89203331, bibcode: 1988pptc.book.....R. http://webcitation.org/69VaKG2nd

* Frank J. Tipler, "The Anthropic Principle: A Primer for Philosophers", in Arthur Fine and Jarrett Leplin (Eds.), PSA 1988: Proceedings of the 1988 Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, Volume Two: Symposia and Invited Papers (East Lansing, Mich.: Philosophy of Science Association, 1989), pp. 27-48, ISBN 091758628X. http://webcitation.org/69VarCM3I

* Frank J. Tipler, "The Omega Point as Eschaton: Answers to Pannenberg's Questions for Scientists", Zygon: Journal of Religion & Science, Vol. 24, No. 2 (June 1989), pp. 217-253, doi:10.1111/j.1467-9744.1989.tb01112.x. Republished as Chapter 7: "The Omega Point as Eschaton: Answers to Pannenberg's Questions to Scientists" in Carol Rausch Albright and Joel Haugen (Eds.), Beginning with the End: God, Science, and Wolfhart Pannenberg (Chicago, Ill.: Open Court Publishing Company, 1997), pp. 156-194, ISBN 0812693256, LCCN 97000114. http://webcitation.org/5nY0aytpz

* Frank J. Tipler, "The ultimate fate of life in universes which undergo inflation", Physics Letters B, Vol. 286, Nos. 1-2 (July 23, 1992), pp. 36-43, doi:10.1016/0370-2693(92)90155-W, bibcode: 1992PhLB..286...36T. http://webcitation.org/64Uskd785

* Frank J. Tipler, "A New Condition Implying the Existence of a Constant Mean Curvature Foliation", bibcode: 1993dgr2.conf..306T, in B[ei]. L. Hu and T[ed]. A. Jacobson (Eds.), Directions in General Relativity: Proceedings of the 1993 International Symposium, Maryland, Volume 2: Papers in Honor of Dieter Brill (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1993), pp. 306-315, ISBN 0521452678, bibcode: 1993dgr2.conf.....H. http://webcitation.org/5qbXJZiX5

* Frank J. Tipler, "Ultrarelativistic Rockets and the Ultimate Future of the Universe", NASA Breakthrough Propulsion Physics Workshop Proceedings, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Jan. 1999, pp. 111-119; an invited paper in the proceedings of a conference held at and sponsored by NASA Lewis Research Center, Cleveland, Ohio, Aug. 12-14, 1997; doi:2060/19990023204. Document ID: 19990023204. Report Number: E-11429; NAS 1.55:208694; NASA/CP-1999-208694. http://webcitation.org/5zPq69I0O Full proceedings volume: http://webcitation.org/69zAxm0sT

* Frank J. Tipler, "There Are No Limits To The Open Society", Critical Rationalist, Vol. 3, No. 2 (Sept. 23, 1998). http://webcitation.org/5sFYkHgSS

* Frank J. Tipler, Jessica Graber, Matthew McGinley, Joshua Nichols-Barrer and Christopher Staecker, "Closed Universes With Black Holes But No Event Horizons As a Solution to the Black Hole Information Problem", arXiv:gr-qc/0003082, Mar. 20, 2000. http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0003082 Published in Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 379, No. 2 (Aug. 2007), pp. 629-640, doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.11895.x, bibcode: 2007MNRAS.379..629T. http://webcitation.org/5vQ3M8uxB

* Frank J. Tipler, "The Ultimate Future of the Universe, Black Hole Event Horizon Topologies, Holography, and the Value of the Cosmological Constant", arXiv:astro-ph/0104011, Apr. 1, 2001. http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0104011 Published in J. Craig Wheeler and Hugo Martel (Eds.), Relativistic Astrophysics: 20th Texas Symposium, Austin, Texas, 10-15 December 2000 (Melville, NY: American Institute of Physics, 2001), pp. 769-772, ISBN 0735400261, LCCN 2001094694, which is AIP Conference Proceedings, Vol. 586 (Oct. 15, 2001), doi:10.1063/1.1419654, bibcode: 2001AIPC..586.....W.

* Frank J. Tipler, "Intelligent life in cosmology", International Journal of Astrobiology, Vol. 2, No. 2 (Apr. 2003), pp. 141-148, doi:10.1017/S1473550403001526, bibcode: 2003IJAsB...2..141T. http://webcitation.org/5o9QHKGuW Also at arXiv:0704.0058, Mar. 31, 2007. http://arxiv.org/abs/0704.0058

* F. J. Tipler, "The structure of the world from pure numbers", Reports on Progress in Physics, Vol. 68, No. 4 (Apr. 2005), pp. 897-964, doi:10.1088/0034-4885/68/4/R04, bibcode: 2005RPPh...68..897T. http://www.math.tulane.edu/~tipler/theoryofeverything.pdf Also released as "Feynman-Weinberg Quantum Gravity and the Extended Standard Model as a Theory of Everything", arXiv:0704.3276, Apr. 24, 2007. http://arxiv.org/abs/0704.3276

* Frank J. Tipler, "Inevitable Existence and Inevitable Goodness of the Singularity", Journal of Consciousness Studies, Vol. 19, Nos. 1-2 (2012), pp. 183-193. http://webcitation.org/69JEi5wHp

Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, in which the above August 2007 paper was published, is one of the world's leading peer-reviewed astrophysics journals.

Prof. Tipler's paper "Ultrarelativistic Rockets and the Ultimate Future of the Universe" was an invited paper for a conference held at and sponsored by NASA Lewis Research Center, so NASA itself has peer-reviewed Tipler's Omega Point Theorem (peer-review is a standard process for published proceedings papers; and again, Tipler's said paper was an *invited* paper by NASA, as opposed to what are called "poster papers").

Zygon is the world's leading peer-reviewed academic journal on science and religion.

Out of 50 articles, Prof. Tipler's 2005 Reports on Progress in Physics paper--which presents the Omega Point/Feynman-DeWitt-Weinberg quantum gravity/Standard Model Theory of Everything (TOE)--was selected as one of 12 for the "Highlights of 2005" accolade as "the very best articles published in Reports on Progress in Physics in 2005 [Vol. 68]. Articles were selected by the Editorial Board for their outstanding reviews of the field. They all received the highest praise from our international referees and a high number of downloads from the journal Website." (See Richard Palmer, Publisher, "Highlights of 2005", Reports on Progress in Physics website, http://webcitation.org/5o9VkK3eE , http://archive.today/pKD3y .)

Reports on Progress in Physics is the leading journal of the Institute of Physics, Britain's main professional body for physicists. Further, Reports on Progress in Physics has a higher impact factor (according to Journal Citation Reports) than Physical Review Letters, which is the most prestigious American physics journal (one, incidently, which Prof. Tipler has been published in more than once). A journal's impact factor reflects the importance the science community places in that journal in the sense of actually citing its papers in their own papers.

For much more on these matters, see my above-cited article "The Physics of God and the Quantum Gravity Theory of Everything" in addition to my below website:

Theophysics: God Is the Ultimate Physicist, http://theophysics.host56.com , http://theophysics.freevar.com .

The only way to avoid the Omega Point cosmology is to reject the known laws of physics (i.e., the Second Law of Thermodynamics, General Relativity, and Quantum Mechanics), and hence to reject empirical science: as these physical laws have been confirmed by every experiment to date. That is, there exists no rational reason for thinking that the Omega Point cosmology is incorrect, and indeed, one must engage in extreme irrationality in order to argue against the Omega Point cosmology.

Additionally, we now have the quantum gravity Theory of Everything (TOE) required by the known laws of physics and that correctly describes and unifies all the forces in physics: of which inherently produces the Omega Point cosmology. So here we have an additional high degree of assurance that the Omega Point cosmology is correct.

-----

Note:

1. While there is a lot that gets published in physics journals that is anti-reality and nonphysical (such as String Theory, which violates the known laws of physics and has no experimental support whatsoever), the reason such things are allowed to pass the peer-review process is because the paradigm of assumptions which such papers are speaking to has been made known, and within their operating paradigm none of the referees could find anything crucially wrong with said papers. That is, the paradigm itself may have nothing to do with reality, but the peer-reviewers could find nothing fundamentally wrong with such papers within the operating assumptions of that paradigm. Whereas, e.g., the operating paradigm of Prof. Tipler's 2005 Reports on Progress in Physics paper and his other papers on the Omega Point Theorem is the known laws of physics, i.e., our actual physical reality which has been repeatedly confirmed by every experiment conducted to date. So the professional physicists charged with refereeing these papers could find nothing fundamentally wrong with them within their operating paradigm, i.e., the known laws of physics.