Since Richard Brent has experienced genuine male multiple orgasms with no refractory period since he first started masturbating as a child, he is unaware of what he is doing that almost all other males are not doing in order to achieve this result. Because of this he has no advice to offer as to techniques men can use in order to achieve the same result (see, e.g., "Q & A"
http://www.multiorgasmic.com/q&a.htm
, http://webcitation.org/6M3zFiz5F
).
James, I must insist that you cease telling others of that which you have single-handedly (pun?) determined I am unaware. I know exactly what it is I experience and what I have always experienced throughout my life, which I scientifically demonstrated almost 20 years ago at Rutgers College of Nursing. And at no time either during that study nor at any time before or since have I ever employed any pubococcygeus (PC) muscle techniques or any other cognitive technique in experiencing natural multiple orgasms (with full ejaculation and continued erection and capacity each time to continue).
Any taught technique is cognitive in nature by very definition and application, requiring its deliberate voluntary employment at a learned recognizable key moment in order to interrupt what would otherwise naturally occur. In my case, what naturally occurs does not need to be interrupted. Thus, there is nothing needed to "learn" and, thus, nothing I can teach others... and that is the reason why I have never attempted to teach any such. In my case, it's simply how I was born and how I have always been.
In the future, I shall expect you to cease claiming to teach that which I naturally experience. To do so is to perpetrate a deliberate fraud and a potentially actionable one. Obviously, you are welcome to teach and promulgate your claimed technique all you like... so long as you do so without any reference to me or claiming to teach that which I experience.
Thank you,
Richard Brent
Research Subject
"Male Multiple Ejaculatory Orgasms: A Case Study"
JSET Vol. 23, No. 2
I thank you, Richard Brent, for confirming my comments on my InfiniLast technique, previously styled my InfiniFuck technique: of which it occurred to me that the term "InfiniFuck" might be thought of as indecorous to some, hence my reason for restyling it my InfiniLast technique.
You above confirmed precisely what I wrote regarding my InfiniLast technique. You said above:
""
And at no time either during that study nor at any time before or since have I ever employed any pubococcygeus (PC) muscle techniques or any other cognitive technique in experiencing natural multiple orgasms (with full ejaculation and continued erection and capacity each time to continue).
""
As I said:
""
Since Richard Brent has experienced genuine male multiple orgasms with no refractory period since he first started masturbating as a child, he is unaware of what he is doing that almost all other males are not doing in order to achieve this result. Because of this he has no advice to offer as to techniques men can use in order to achieve the same result (see, e.g., "Q & A"
http://www.multiorgasmic.com/q&a.htm
,
http://webcitation.org/6M3zFiz5F
).
""
And as I also went on to write:
""
The more one works at this the easier it becomes. So easy, in fact, that once one becomes proficient at this one is unlikely to notice any additional effort needed in maintaining an erection after an ejaculation while continuing to have sex.
""
With myself, I learned my InfiniLast technique with my then-girlfriend Rhonda by Providence. It just happened one night. She was riding my erect penis, yet I never went soft, even though I ejaculated into her multiple times without any form of prophylactic--or "bareback", as the commoners say. It was nothing conscious on my part.
You go on to write:
""
Any taught technique is cognitive in nature by very definition and application, requiring its deliberate voluntary employment at a learned recognizable key moment in order to interrupt what would otherwise naturally occur.
""
I was "taught" my InfiniLast technique by God Himself. The reason God chose to impart it to me is because He knew that I could be counted upon to impart it to others.
And as I said, this just happened one night. There was no "teaching" involved with me acquiring this capability. Yet because I was used to the usual refractory period that almost all males experience after orgasm, I was able to understand what was occurring regarding the physicality of my body that was different than the previous standard refractory period after orgasm. Whereas you have always experienced no refractory period after orgasm, and hence, as you stated, you have no advice to offer regarding this matter.
Well, thankfully for the rest of humanity (even for lesbians and asexuals, by making the rest of the world happier people), I do know how to achieve multiple male orgasms with no refractory period, and I have successfully taught this to other males.
Regarding your absurd requests of me: I request that you convert to Christianity and thereby become a decent human being whose soul (i.e., the computer program of one's mind) is saved. Your false accusation of "fraud" against me is a phantasm of your mind, as you verified precisely what I wrote concerning my InfiniLast technique vis-à-vis you. Further, I make no money off of anything I write, let alone my InfiniLast technique. I gave the entire technique. And that all for free. I didn't post this as a hook to reel people in to buy something I'm selling, as I have nothing for sell. So your false accusation of "fraud" is doubly-wrong: it's wrong because you verified that what I said about you is correct; and it's wrong because I'm not selling anything.
In order to facilitate your transition into Christianity, if you should so wisely choose to do so, see my following article on physicist and mathematician Prof. Frank J. Tipler's Omega Point cosmology, which is a proof (i.e., mathematical theorem) of God's existence per the known laws of physics (viz., the Second Law of Thermodynamics, General Relativity, and Quantum Mechanics), and the Feynman-DeWitt-Weinberg quantum gravity/Standard Model Theory of Everything (TOE), which is also required by said known physical laws. The Omega Point cosmology has been published and extensively peer-reviewed in leading physics journals.
James Redford, "The Physics of God and the Quantum Gravity Theory of Everything", Social Science Research Network (SSRN), Sept. 10, 2012 (orig. pub. Dec. 19, 2011), 186 pp., doi:10.2139/ssrn.1974708; PDF, 1741424 bytes, MD5: 8f7b21ee1e236fc2fbb22b4ee4bbd4cb,
http://ssrn.com/abstract=1974708
,
http://archive.org/download/ThePhysicsOfGodAndTheQuantumGravityTheoryOfEverything/Redford-Physics-of-God.pdf
,
http://theophysics.host56.com/Redford-Physics-of-God.pdf
,
http://alphaomegapoint.files.wordpress.com/2013/03/redford-physics-of-god.pdf
,
http://sites.google.com/site/physicotheism/home/Redford-Physics-of-God.pdf
.
My foregoing article further provides an examination of the globalist political power-elite: history is given on their organizational structure and their methods of accumulating power; and analysis is given on where they're attempting to take the world, i.e., their self-termed New World Order world government and world religion.
The article furnishes documentation on what the globalist oligarchy's ultimate goal is. This ultimate goal of theirs most popularly goes by the name of transhumanism: immortality through technology. However, I explain in the article that the coming radical life-extension technologies create a fundamental dilemma for the oligarchs, which is why they must dominate world society before such technology becomes a reality. The details of that dilemma are explained in Sec. 8.2.2: "The Mark of the Beast" of the article.
Thus, this article explains to people what is to occur and why it is to occur, so that they will not be in ignorance as to the events that are to unfold.
Additionally, in the below resource are six sections which contain very informative videos of Prof. Tipler explaining the Omega Point cosmology and the Feynman-DeWitt-Weinberg quantum gravity/Standard Model TOE. The seventh section therein contains an audio interview of Tipler. I also provide some helpful notes and commentary for some of these videos.
James Redford, "Video of Profs. Frank Tipler and Lawrence Krauss's Debate at Caltech: Can Physics Prove God and Christianity?", alt.sci.astro, Message-ID:
jghev8tcbv02b6vn3uiq8jmelp7jijluqk@4ax.com
, 30 Jul 2013 00:51:55 -0400,
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.sci.astro/KQWt4KcpMVo
,
http://archive.today/a04w9
,
http://webcitation.org/6IUTAMEyS
. The plain text of this post is available at: TXT, 42423 bytes, MD5: b199e867e42d54b2b8bf6adcb4127761,
http://mirrorcreator.com/files/JCFTZSS8/
,
http://ge.tt/3lOTVbp
.