あなたは単独のコメントのスレッドを見ています。

残りのコメントをみる →

[–]LurkerNoMore2014 24 ポイント25 ポイント  (45子コメント)

If that guy did NOT have that handgun, how different do you think this would have played out?

[–]BMXHAWK 6 ポイント7 ポイント  (25子コメント)

I was about to say that! Now what would have happened if guns were banned?

[–]SkullCollector 21 ポイント22 ポイント  (17子コメント)

What would happen if guns were banned?

The criminals would still have them (because, newsflash: criminals don't give a shit about laws) but Jimbo wouldn't because he's a law abiding citizen. Jimbo and his wife and that delivery man would have been robbed at gunpoint at the very least, at the very worst, all 3 would have died.

That's what would happen if guns were banned.

[–]signious 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Hi, my name is Canada and I have news for you

[–]low_ho_fosho 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (2子コメント)

I agree!

But my biggest problem is with the fetishization of guns in American culture. Instead of guns being incredibly powerful tools for defense that are to be treated with respect, they are toys to use at gun ranges or collectibles to show off to your buddies. This guy did not need an AR15, AK47, or any similar weapon to defend himself. He did not need more than a few rounds of ammo. What we need is sensible regulation, which includes taking away guns from criminals and the mentally unstable.

EDIT: If anyone disagrees, why? This is a discussion America needs to have!

[–]Tulki -3 ポイント-2 ポイント  (1子コメント)

Nobody's having the discussion because you made up the subject. People in America don't fetishize guns.

[–]low_ho_fosho 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

So why do you think people need to own more than a handgun and a few (a dozen or so) rounds of ammo to defend themselves?

[–]Upvotes_poo_comments -4 ポイント-3 ポイント  (0子コメント)

If you couldn't keep a gun in the same house as a psycopath, what would've happened at Sandy Hook?