あなたは単独のコメントのスレッドを見ています。

残りのコメントをみる →

[–]12inchrecordOCTGN: victorb -6 ポイント-5 ポイント  (14子コメント)

an on-line implementation of the game.

That part is required for the ban-hammer.

FFG has been pretty clear in what the rules are.

[–]emlunNasir Meidan HYPE! 8 ポイント9 ポイント  (5子コメント)

FFG has been pretty clear in what the rules are.

Oh? I haven't seen it, care to share?

[–]Let_Me_Be 4 ポイント5 ポイント  (7子コメント)

Meteor is a deckbuilder as well, if netrunnerDB fallen into this category, Meteor definitely does too.

[–]WalterSkinnerFBI 7 ポイント8 ポイント  (6子コメント)

IT has nothing to do with a deck builder. It has everything to do with the API that NRDB used that allowed a site to use an online implementation of the game with hi-res images. NRDB was, knowingly or otherwise, fueling a replacement for the game. OCTGN operates within some pretty specific parameters to keep FFG from coming down on them and that other site stepped across the line.

You'll note that ONLY the two sites that were involved in that online implementation of the game itself received the C&Ds. Nothing else did.

This entire thread is a reactionary witch hunt.

[–]nomm_ 7 ポイント8 ポイント  (3子コメント)

Just to clarify, Jinteki.net was not using NRDB's API, it was just linking directly to the images hosted there. It could just as easily have linked to the images directly on CGDB.

[–][削除されました]  (2子コメント)

[deleted]

    [–]turkey_berzerkyTaggin' Dragon 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (1子コメント)

    Most of CGDB's images are not watermarked.

    [–]luquaum 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

    You'll note that ONLY the two sites that were involved in that online implementation of the game itself received the C&Ds. Nothing else did.

    Netrunnerspoilers.com also did.