use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
e.g. subreddit:aww site:imgur.com dog
subreddit:aww site:imgur.com dog
詳しくは検索FAQを参照
高度な検索: 投稿者や、subredditで……
~73 現在のここのユーザー
For showcasing images of faces you want to punch
Rules:
Pictures of politicians are fine, but no political discussion in the comments. This is not /r/politics.
No memes (I can't believe I have to even have to have this as a rule.)
This smug bastard (youtube.com)
AtomicDog1471 が 2 日 前 投稿
残りのコメントをみる →
[–]GroundhogExpert 17 ポイント18 ポイント19 ポイント 2 日 前* (67子コメント)
You mean the guy singing? Yeah, I wanna punch him. It's a shame the thumbnail is of a rather well-spoken academic.
[+]Kelsig スコアが基準値未満のコメント-23 ポイント-22 ポイント-21 ポイント 2 日 前 (66子コメント)
"academic"
[–]GroundhogExpert 8 ポイント9 ポイント10 ポイント 2 日 前 (65子コメント)
Why the quotes? And what are your requirements before someone can be labeled an academic?
[+]ewjfww スコアが基準値未満のコメント-17 ポイント-16 ポイント-15 ポイント 1 日 前 (52子コメント)
Hahaha. She is as much a philosopher as Reza Aslan is a historian or Sam Harris is a cognitive scientist. If you are impressed with her as an academic then you are a dumb ass.
[–]GroundhogExpert 12 ポイント13 ポイント14 ポイント 1 日 前 (51子コメント)
Impressed? I have to be impressed with someone before they get a label that fits? She was a professor, she has a Ph.D., what else does someone need to be an academic, you fucking child?
[+]ewjfww スコアが基準値未満のコメント-17 ポイント-16 ポイント-15 ポイント 1 日 前 (50子コメント)
The label now does not fit. You just think that it still does. Hence you are a dumb ass.
[–]GroundhogExpert 9 ポイント10 ポイント11 ポイント 1 日 前 (49子コメント)
How does it not fit? Explain to me someone who IS an academic and why, and then explain how that label does not apply here? I don't give shit that you're pissed off at someone pointing how fucking stupid modern feminism is, that's not the issue. You get that, right? You're just engaging in the basic form of ad hominem right now, you anti-intellectual.
[+]ewjfww スコアが基準値未満のコメント-14 ポイント-13 ポイント-12 ポイント 1 日 前 (48子コメント)
As you said that is not the issue. Show me where I am pissed off that she is pointing out the stupidity of modern feminism. Go on. Quote me. I dare you.
She is a polemicist not an academic. Do you really need me to guide you through the differences? If you are so incapable of understanding the difference then there is really no hope for you, little man.
[–]GroundhogExpert 8 ポイント9 ポイント10 ポイント 1 日 前 (47子コメント)
At this point, I'm not going to continue this discussion unless you explain, in detail, what you think an academic is and what's required to be one.
[+]ewjfww スコアが基準値未満のコメント-12 ポイント-11 ポイント-10 ポイント 1 日 前 (46子コメント)
Be a member of the academy: that is you work, teach, publish and are involved in the dialogue of the academy. Does she teach in an academic environment? Does she publish in the academic press? Are her works discussed and engaged with at an academic level by other academics? Not anymore.
But she has said something that you agree with so therefore you think that she is an academic. You think that labeling her thus gives your worldview a veneer of integrity.
[+]Kelsig スコアが基準値未満のコメント-11 ポイント-10 ポイント-9 ポイント 1 日 前 (11子コメント)
Because all puppets for the GOP are academic
[–]GroundhogExpert 9 ポイント10 ポイント11 ポイント 1 日 前 (10子コメント)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christina_Hoff_Sommers
Care to explain why her political affiliation undoes her career? By every measure, she is an academic. You have no basis for this bullshit you're spouting other than a blatant ad hominem argument.
[–]autowikibot 1 ポイント2 ポイント3 ポイント 1 日 前 (0子コメント)
Christina Hoff Sommers:
Christina Hoff Sommers (/ˈsʌmərz/; born 1950) is an American author and former philosophy professor who is known for her critique of late 20th century feminism, and her writings about feminism in contemporary American culture. Her most widely discussed books are Who Stole Feminism? How Women Have Betrayed Women and The War Against Boys: How Misguided Feminism Is Harming Our Young Men. Sommers is a self-described "equity feminist" who faults contemporary feminism for "its irrational hostility to men, its recklessness with facts and statistics, and its inability to take seriously the possibility that the sexes are equal – but different." Some of her critics refer to her as anti-feminist. Image i
Christina Hoff Sommers (/ˈsʌmərz/; born 1950) is an American author and former philosophy professor who is known for her critique of late 20th century feminism, and her writings about feminism in contemporary American culture. Her most widely discussed books are Who Stole Feminism? How Women Have Betrayed Women and The War Against Boys: How Misguided Feminism Is Harming Our Young Men. Sommers is a self-described "equity feminist" who faults contemporary feminism for "its irrational hostility to men, its recklessness with facts and statistics, and its inability to take seriously the possibility that the sexes are equal – but different." Some of her critics refer to her as anti-feminist.
Image i
Interesting: Who Stole Feminism? | American Enterprise Institute | Sommers (surname) | Sally Satel
Parent commenter can toggle NSFW or delete. Will also delete on comment score of -1 or less. | FAQs | Mods | Magic Words
[+]Kelsig スコアが基準値未満のコメント-10 ポイント-9 ポイント-8 ポイント 1 日 前 (8子コメント)
"Career"
[–]GroundhogExpert 9 ポイント10 ポイント11 ポイント 1 日 前 (7子コメント)
You do realize that getting a Ph.D. alone is called a career, right? Just because they say something you don't like doesn't change that fact. Further, SHE FUCKNIG TAUGHT PHILOSOPHY. What other measure would you require before someone can be called an academic? You're just throwing temper tantrum, nothing else.
[+]Kelsig スコアが基準値未満のコメント-10 ポイント-9 ポイント-8 ポイント 1 日 前 (6子コメント)
"philosophy"
[–]GroundhogExpert 6 ポイント7 ポイント8 ポイント 1 日 前 (5子コメント)
Super convincing. Thanks for stopping by.
[+]Kelsig スコアが基準値未満のコメント-13 ポイント-12 ポイント-11 ポイント 1 日 前 (4子コメント)
"Thanks"
必要なのはユーザ名とパスワードだけ
for more information, see our privacy policy.
アカウントを作る
ソンナニカンタン? チョットタメシテミナイ?
アカウントがあるなら後はログインするだけ
ログイン
π Rendered by PID 23234 on app-28 at 2014-09-27 06:04:20.810274+00:00 running 1ffd33e country code: JP.
残りのコメントをみる →
[–]GroundhogExpert 17 ポイント18 ポイント19 ポイント (67子コメント)
[+]Kelsig スコアが基準値未満のコメント-23 ポイント-22 ポイント-21 ポイント (66子コメント)
[–]GroundhogExpert 8 ポイント9 ポイント10 ポイント (65子コメント)
[+]ewjfww スコアが基準値未満のコメント-17 ポイント-16 ポイント-15 ポイント (52子コメント)
[–]GroundhogExpert 12 ポイント13 ポイント14 ポイント (51子コメント)
[+]ewjfww スコアが基準値未満のコメント-17 ポイント-16 ポイント-15 ポイント (50子コメント)
[–]GroundhogExpert 9 ポイント10 ポイント11 ポイント (49子コメント)
[+]ewjfww スコアが基準値未満のコメント-14 ポイント-13 ポイント-12 ポイント (48子コメント)
[–]GroundhogExpert 8 ポイント9 ポイント10 ポイント (47子コメント)
[+]ewjfww スコアが基準値未満のコメント-12 ポイント-11 ポイント-10 ポイント (46子コメント)
[+]Kelsig スコアが基準値未満のコメント-11 ポイント-10 ポイント-9 ポイント (11子コメント)
[–]GroundhogExpert 9 ポイント10 ポイント11 ポイント (10子コメント)
[–]autowikibot 1 ポイント2 ポイント3 ポイント (0子コメント)
[+]Kelsig スコアが基準値未満のコメント-10 ポイント-9 ポイント-8 ポイント (8子コメント)
[–]GroundhogExpert 9 ポイント10 ポイント11 ポイント (7子コメント)
[+]Kelsig スコアが基準値未満のコメント-10 ポイント-9 ポイント-8 ポイント (6子コメント)
[–]GroundhogExpert 6 ポイント7 ポイント8 ポイント (5子コメント)
[+]Kelsig スコアが基準値未満のコメント-13 ポイント-12 ポイント-11 ポイント (4子コメント)