44
45

[Ironic Gossip] Mod of r/TheFappening whines in /r/drama modmail because we wont remove a post.Butthurt <3 (imgur.com)

TwasIWhoShotJR が 投稿

並べ替え:
ベスト
ベスト
トップ
新着
注目
論争中
古い順
あなたは単独のコメントのスレッドを見ています。

残りのコメントをみる →

[–][deleted] 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (29子コメント)

I agree with preggit.I hope that you are treated better if you are ever put in that situation JR, Then maybe you'll have a different outlook. Doxxing is not cool or allowed in any way shape or form, and allowing such a post is unacceptable and against reddits TOS.

[–]gerradp 3 ポイント4 ポイント  (7子コメント)

It is a fucking news article in a paper read by tens of millions of people. It is not doxxing if the information is already out there for literally EVERYONE on the planet to see. Removing the link won't put the genie back in the bottle, dipshit.

The article is a lot more than just some guy's name, it is an investigative piece. Additionally, there is no rule violation here, so maybe you could read the sidebar, or the image, and realize that this is not some person commenting all of someone's information, it is a public news article.

[–]reckie87 5 ポイント6 ポイント  (0子コメント)

No, this is a blog post. This would never make the paper. Bloggers are not news they are opinion and this post is no different than a self post on reddit. Just because it is on a news site doesn't make it news. There is no editorial staff reviewing this.

[–][deleted] -2 ポイント-1 ポイント  (5子コメント)

/u/reckie87 said it best. Who's the dipshit now?

[–]chaanachIma Shelcha Matzetza Li Etmol[M] -2 ポイント-1 ポイント  (4子コメント)

Both of you look unfamiliar. Did somewun's hurt feewings call for backup?

[–][deleted] 3 ポイント4 ポイント  (3子コメント)

No, you realize this thread has been linked to other subs right? You think a drama mod would realize that.

[–]UrbanDryad 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Can confirm. I got here after finding the username of the mod of /r/fappening in a random news article.

I was sure the article wasn't quoting him correctly and wanted to see for myself. How anyone could actually bitch about their privacy being invaded because their Reddit comment history was being browsed after modding a subreddit dedicated to leaked photos was mindblowing.

[–]chaanachIma Shelcha Matzetza Li Etmol[M] 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

feeeeeewings

[–]chaanachIma Shelcha Matzetza Li Etmol[M] 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (9子コメント)

Doxxing is not cool or allowed in any way shape or form, and allowing such a post is unacceptable and against reddits TOS.

it's fair play if it's in a major journalistic article on the interwebs. VA scandal taught us this factoid.

[–][deleted] 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (7子コメント)

It's a blog, similar to a self post on reddit, not reviewed by editors.

[–]chaanachIma Shelcha Matzetza Li Etmol 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (6子コメント)

Yeah and gawker isn't a newspaper either. It makes the barest standards of journalism, it is no longer considered dox.

JR got a PM from an admin confirming this.

[–][deleted] 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (5子コメント)

A blog post is hardly journalism, nor is it a reliable source. Any article that tries to link a reddit users account with his personal information should be considered a dox if its posted on this website. , even if it is considered a "reputable news source". Just because this is a blogger on The Washington post, Doesn't mean its official, unbiased, and factual. Just because Washington Post let it slide, doesn't mean that we should. They don't make the rules about what should be allowed on THIS website. The admins and in some forms, the moderators and users do well. It is clearly outlined in the Reddit TOS that doxxing is prohibited. We have had to report users to the admins over at /r/4chan because the posted a screen shot of a post with someones personal information. To me, that is no different from this.

I don't agree with cupcake, and I really hope some higher ups educate her on why allowing this post is not ok, and how it could become a liability to the company, and to even herself for allowing it to continue this far.

[–]chaanachIma Shelcha Matzetza Li Etmol 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (4子コメント)

The admins and in some forms, the moderators and users do well. It is clearly outlined in the Reddit TOS that doxxing is prohibited.

The admins said it's ok, and that's all that matters.

It is clearly outlined in the Reddit TOS that doxxing is prohibited.

The reddit TOS is defined by the admins. Posting someone's address and facebook in the comments of a post is dox. Posting Laurelai's ED page is dox. If a reputable-ish news source runs a story, that link isn't considered dox. Other mods and random users have shit-all to do with what is considered dox outside of their own subreddits.

We have had to report users to the admins over at /r/4chan because the posted a screen shot of a post with someones personal information. To me, that is no different from this.

A screencap from 4chan is different than someone publishing this. Also, I don't care about your own rules from your own sub. We have the admin's go-ahead, we're a drama subreddit, we can do what we want.

BTW this wasn't cupcake's call. This was reddit as a whole's call back during the Violentacrez thing. Bitch and moan all you want, that article isn't considered dox.

Christ, why does everyone seem to think there's some moderator solidarity going on? Congrats clap clap clap we all lord over our domains, for free, thanklessly, because we enjoy an interest. That doesn't mean that we're a web of interconnected souls who share the same opinion on anything vaguely mod-related.

[–][deleted] 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (3子コメント)

If a reputable-ish news source runs a story

A blogpost is not a news story.

A screencap from 4chan is different than someone publishing this

No its not, the " article" in question is a blogpost. Its not really different than a post on 4chan other than its a different forum, with a different use rbase.

we can do what we want.

No, you can't. You are not above the rules of reddit.

Christ, why does everyone seem to think there's some moderator solidarity going on? Congrats clap clap clap we all lord over our domains, for free, thanklessly, because we enjoy an interest. That doesn't mean that we're a web of interconnected souls who share the same opinion on anything vaguely mod-related.

I never said we were. I said that I agree with preggit.

[–]chaanachIma Shelcha Matzetza Li Etmol 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (2子コメント)

A blogpost is not a news story.

it is to the adminsssss

[–][deleted] 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (1子コメント)

Fuck the admins.

[–]chaanachIma Shelcha Matzetza Li Etmol 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

their rules bro

[–]Eor75 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (10子コメント)

Why is doxing such a sin on reddit? What's the big deal?

[–]ShelteredCanadian 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (8子コメント)

Because it can put people's lives at risk and open them to real life harassment and danger.

[–]Eor75 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (7子コメント)

Just having someone's name doesn't mean people are going to kill or harass them. I don't see the problem with things like the jailbait forum moderator getting found out, or creepshots or other horrible things catching up with the person who did it.

[–]ShelteredCanadian 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

But a lot of doxxing is of innocent people, and I they're part of a controversial situation, they can be put in danger. What if the family members of a cop in a major brutality scandal got outed? It's just a shitty thing to do, and Reddit is against it because if something does happen, there could be liability on their part.

[–]hoodis 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

You should look into reddits accuracy. I think they're batting .100 or lower.

[–][deleted] -2 ポイント-1 ポイント  (4子コメント)

don't see the problem with things like the jailbait forum moderator getting found out, or creepshots or other horrible things catching up with the person who did it.

So you are condoning violence on internet moderators because you don't agree with what they moderate, even if its legal? /r/creepshots may have been unsavory, but i don't necessarily think it was illegal.

[–]Eor75 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (3子コメント)

I never said anything about violence, I was just talking about them being tied to it. So everyone knows that "John Smith" is the asshole taking pictures of underage girls at pools.

[–][deleted] -2 ポイント-1 ポイント  (2子コメント)

A moderator and submitter of content aren't always one in the same.

[–]Pavl_ 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (1子コメント)

If you mod the sub-reddit, you are passively condoning the activities associated with said sub-reddit, otherwise you wouldn't be a mod, why is that so hard for you to understand?

Would you become a mod of /r/WeLikeToFuckDonkeys if you didn't have any interest in the content?

[–][deleted] -4 ポイント-3 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Yes. I would actually.

[–][deleted] -2 ポイント-1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Would you wan't the entirety of your reddit comment history attached to your name? Some people don't. Some people like the idea of online anonymity.