評価の高い 200 コメント全て表示する 296

[–][削除されました]  (1子コメント)

[deleted]

    [–]jhatpat 19 ポイント20 ポイント  (9子コメント)

    In Syria Muslims have killed around 1.5 lac Muslims but I don't hear a single word from Indian Muslims against them, isn't this double standards?

    [–]mavriksfan11 4 ポイント5 ポイント  (2子コメント)

    There are many Muslims who are against Syria, there are so many that they've gone there to fight them! How much more outraged can you get than travelling somewhere to defend people (not judging or saying it's good, just saying the "outrage" you all senselessly demand is there).

    [–]jhatpat 3 ポイント4 ポイント  (1子コメント)

    And went there again to kill more Muslims.

    [–]mavriksfan11 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

    Like I said, can't get more outraged than that. If you guys are so hot for "outrage", you have it.

    [–]crashbandikoot 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (5子コメント)

    Um.. Palestine is also important from a religious perspective. Not sure if you knew that. A hundred Muslims could die in Pakistan tomorrow and it wouldn't elicit any response.

    [–]xdesi 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (0子コメント)

    and it wouldn't elicit any response

    Only because it is a Muslim majority country that is avowedly Muslim. The easiest way to see it is to see what happens when much less than a hundred die in India.

    [–]jhatpat 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

    The reason is not that its religious place it is Israel who is killing.

    [–]SAV-v 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (2子コメント)

    that's the point, because it's a Muslim majority country. if even ten Muslims died in India or say the US tomorrow, see the outrage from Muslims

    [–]crashbandikoot -1 ポイント0 ポイント  (1子コメント)

    Muslims : a band of 1.2 billion people who behave in a homogenous manner.

    Amirite boys?

    Eg : 6 Muslims went to join isis

    Damn these Muslims!! Why are they supporting isis.

    [–]eldaisfishMaratha Pao 25 ポイント26 ポイント  (12子コメント)

    Ok. I'm tired of this bullshit.

    Let's assume that you are right and take this statement.

    I DO NOT believe that Muslims are a minority in India.

    They are not a minority. They are the second largest majority. This minority image is a political stunt to gain votes. Plain and simple.

    Then again, indian muslims are not one, homogeneous block. They have sects. Taken as a whole, they are not a minority.

    Islam is a violent, fascist cult whose goal is to convert as many people as possible to it. Tolerance is not only absent, it is seen as a weakness that can be taken advantage of.

    Granted, there are problems with the teachings of the religion as evidenced by so many but which religion is without fanatics? Remember that no reformation like event has happened in Islam. Instead, the broader Muslim world seems to be getting caught up in an often bloody debate about who the true muslims are. If you need a similar case in point, look at Ulster, in Ireland. Torn between Catholic and Protestant fanatics who are often violent. Isn't the goal of christianity, too, to convert the maximum number of people?

    All religions can be called violent, fascist cults. In parts of the 'Christian' west, the religion has more elements of common sense but you cannot deny that blind fanaticism still exists. The problem in the muslim world is not helped in the least by the fact that modern education and science are often frowned upon. Add to this the problem of economic deprivation and you have a situation where religion becomes the opium of the masses. Whatever this religion, as proclaimed by it's high priests and imams, seems to believe will be exactly what the people will lap up. That said, there are several muslim scholars, even in supposedly evil Saudi Arabia, who have called the Taliban and ISIS exactly what they are. Terrorists.

    The attitude of muslims to 'fringe extremist elements' seems to be one of passive ignorance and hence support. I cannot comment on this as i am not muslim myself and hence cannot speak for the community. There is a great deal of hypocrisy among Muslims when it comes to calling out the sins of their own. I, too, find this selective outrage targeted at Israel, to be strange given the fact that Muslims are slaughtering other muslims in Iraq, Iran and Pakistan.

    Islam is the single biggest danger that India faces today and must be STRICTLY DEALT WITH, no matter what it takes.

    Corruption, bigotry and ignorance coupled with economic deprivation are the biggest threats to India today. Islam is just a religion.

    [–]xdesi 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (3子コメント)

    The attitude of muslims to 'fringe extremist elements' seems to be one of passive ignorance and hence support.

    This is a common observation. Determining why this happens and is unique (in today's world) to Islam is the key to solving this problem, IMO.

    [–]eldaisfishMaratha Pao 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (2子コメント)

    Maybe it because the people who oppose the nonsense are themselves scared by the threat of violence?

    I would be scared if a bunch of men wearing skull caps threatened me if i spoke out against their religion. I would also be scared if a bunch of saffron clad men threatened me.

    It could be that the Western media drowns out or doesn't cover the voices of reason in the Islamic world. I used to watch the TV in the Arabian gulf and i never heard the imams on TV condemning either the West or the perpetrators of the 9/11 attacks. They did condemn the 'filthy Jews' in Israel but that was about it.

    [–]xdesi 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (1子コメント)

    Maybe it because the people who oppose the nonsense are themselves scared by the threat of violence?

    If you went ahead and figured out why that threat of violence is unique to Islam, you may uncover something very interesting.

    [–]eldaisfishMaratha Pao -1 ポイント0 ポイント  (0子コメント)

    I've read and listened to all that.

    Time for change.

    [–]nlpreddit 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

    IDK how you can say it is just a religion at least for India. Internally, the threat is smaller. There is some separatism of course, and the ever present danger of riots or terrorism and the subsequent riots that threaten to derail our country's progress. But even these are small issues. The presence of an almost crazy neighbour with no dearth of crazy elements who wanna destroy India over Islam (which is the main difference between our neighbour and us) is actually a much more serious issue. So, for countries like India and Israel, Islam is not just a religion.

    [–]fscker -4 ポイント-3 ポイント  (6子コメント)

    Islam is not just a religion. it is a religion of intolerance and violence.

    I would like to jog your memory back to the cartoons of Mohammed in the Danish news paper. Not one Muslim made a statement condemning the violent marches and protests. Not one muslim spoke out for the Freedom of Speech. Islam doesn't tolerate.

    [–]eldaisfishMaratha Pao -2 ポイント-1 ポイント  (5子コメント)

    While i don't have any credible examples of mulsims decrying the violent reaction to the cartoons, there is this

    I also remember Tariq Ramadam calling for peace and for the muslim world to ignore the cartoons.

    [–]fscker 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (4子コメント)

    Heh what would happen to him in a Muslim majority country? There are theocracies that would stone him to death for apologising to the Danish cartoonist. Only in Islamic theocracies.

    [–]matdrawmentibn-e-batata 15 ポイント16 ポイント  (8子コメント)

    Is it just me, or are the views presented on r/india beginning to scare other people too now?

    [–]ninteyokeappaniamurdaddy 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

    New to /r/india and i was like what the fuck is this shit. But eventually OP and people like that are just normal human beings with their opinion.Closet warriors. Who cares.

    [–]rahulthewallKadhi Chawal Bhakt 7 ポイント8 ポイント  (1子コメント)

    More disgusted than scared to be honest.

    [–]coldcoldnovemberrain -1 ポイント0 ポイント  (0子コメント)

    seriously yaar....and to think I was super bored so went through this whole thread. I think all this religious stuff needs another sub. /r/IndiaMoosleemRproblem or something like that.

    [–]avinassh -1 ポイント0 ポイント  (0子コメント)

    Makes me feel sad :(

    [–]husainhz7 34 ポイント35 ポイント  (128子コメント)

    Disclaimer: I am a Muslim. I hope you considered that you cannot blame the whole community for the action of a few. I know it is not a few. But these blood- thirsty people cannot be considered Muslims. Those who kill innocents are STRICTLY not Muslims. They may call themselves but are just blindly using religion as an excuse. Islam DOESN'T approve or encourage wars against non-believers. Most of these just uneducated people who have nothing to do. So please I hope you change your wordings and place groupings carefully, for if you continue I, a scout, topper, would be soon degraded to a damn terrorist.

    [–]moojowhat what 19 ポイント20 ポイント  (2子コメント)

    Those who kill innocents are STRICTLY not Muslims.

    The problem is that extremists think the same about you, moderate muslims. So who is right?

    [–]vveksuvarna 7 ポイント8 ポイント  (1子コメント)

    This is called a "No true scotsman" fallacy

    [–]moojowhat what 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

    I did not know this, thanks

    [–]DaManmohansinghIlya i laurëa ná, mirilya lá, 18 ポイント19 ポイント  (0子コメント)

    70% of terrorists caught in Britain had a uni degree.

    All the 9/11 suicide bombers had a uni degree.

    Why, of the three Mumbai kids who joined the ISIS, 2 were engineers, their parents doctors.

    The head of most jihadi orgs is run by post graduates. Why even the head of ISIS was supposed to be a brilliant student.

    The claim that uneducated, brainwashed terrorists do the murderous job is wrong.

    [–]funkymunkmy fillair 35 ポイント36 ポイント  (94子コメント)

    Then ask your mullahs to say it out loud on their websites. Condemn it throughout the community and disown the perpetrators publicly. Until that happens, it is difficult to believe what you say.

    [–][deleted] 15 ポイント16 ポイント  (43子コメント)

    Yes, let's also ask the Shankaracharyas to speak out against people like Babu Bajrangi and Dara Singh (Odisha case). Shall we ? Ask the oh so holy men to speak out against casteism openly.

    Just because some Hindu men brought down Babri Masjid and some even today glorify the act, does it mean that all Muslims should hate all Hindus ?

    It's easier to point fingers at others forgetting that every religious or school-of-thought-sharing community has it's own class of criminals.

    [–]kwantize 6 ポイント7 ポイント  (0子コメント)

    Except ... unlike Mullahs, Hindu gurus don't have much power. You may recall that Jayalalitha has sent her policemen into the Kanchipuram Shankaracharya's Math with their boots on. Try that with a Mullah.

    [–]blues2911 10 ポイント11 ポイント  (1子コメント)

    Umm hindu figures particularly the RSS have done more work than anyone else to curb casteism.

    The difference here is that whenever theres an incident of hindu extremism theres more than plenty of moderates who raise their voice - not just public figures but middle classes included. Among muslims this is completely absent.

    [–]eldaisfishMaratha Pao 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

    Among muslims this is completely absent.

    It's not completely absent. These voices of reason are more often than not accused of being betrayers of the faith by some people who, supposedly, have more fervour.

    [–]funkymunkmy fillair 17 ポイント18 ポイント  (15子コメント)

    Yes, let us ask them to do that. Assholes should not be tolerated, regardless of their religion.

    And the practise of caste is revolting to me. I have suffered considerable personal damage because of it.

    In my opinion, all religions sjould be declared as fairy tales, and the world must be made to move on. But doing so would be too extremist. Instead, asking these assholes to denounce the perpetrators of religion-based crime seems to be a good first step.

    [–][deleted] 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (14子コメント)

    Then start from our own religion first. Let's get the fundamentalist Hindu out of us before making way for simple and easy hate-mongering Hindu fundamentalism.

    For example, Savarkar who is revered today for Hindutva is conveniently forgotten for also being the one to throw the doors of temples in MH open for lower castes through dharna and agitation. Why not follow that example ? Why not do that ? Why not speak out against problems with how we practice Hinduism first ?

    [–]funkymunkmy fillair 15 ポイント16 ポイント  (11子コメント)

    I do. I question my pandit at all instances, and he answers. This despite me having given up religion. I do not fear for my life by doing that. Furthermore, as bad as fundamentalism is in any form, the "fundie hindoo" is not out there blowing up trains and attacking our Army.

    santron ko seb ke basket me naa rakho.

    [–]eldaisfishMaratha Pao 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (0子コメント)

    I do not fear for my life by doing that.

    As politically incorrect as this may sound, this is the difference between Islam and other religions.

    Which countries tabled the 'Defamation of Islam' bill at the UN?

    No prizes for guessing that the charge was led by Pakistan.

    [–]returnme 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (1子コメント)

    not sure savarkar is forgotten. Fucking Congress party forgot everybody that was not nehru.

    [–][deleted] 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

    Those who remember him forget his thoughts about casteism and don't take that as an example to follow.

    [–]DaManmohansinghIlya i laurëa ná, mirilya lá, 8 ポイント9 ポイント  (14子コメント)

    Are you equating a Babu Bajrangi to somebody like Hafees Saed or Baghdadi?

    Or are you saying Hinduism is as violent and intolerant as Islam?

    [–]linux_shadow 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (7子コメント)

    What the hell do you mean by 'EQUATING' and 'AS' intolerant? Are you trying to imply anything positive about babu bajrangi?

    Is there a benchmark to compare these rotten people or the mindless, selfish and parasitic ideologies that supports them?

    Any organized 'religion' can be as violent and intolerant as any other. such organized groups gradually get taken over by assholes and turn into terrorist mobs. there are numerous examples all over the world and during all times that prove this fact

    [–]blues2911 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (6子コメント)

    So you ARE saying islam is not the most intolerant anti social religion

    [–]linux_shadow -1 ポイント0 ポイント  (5子コメント)

    Any organized 'religion' can be as violent and intolerant as any other.

    So you ARE saying islam is not the most intolerant anti social religion

    Which part of my comment gives you that understanding? cognitive challenges?

    I have better things to do than to maintain a list of religions based on intolerance. All of them can be very bad and all of them can be good. as an individual i hate most of what islam preaches. but then there are many things in other religions that i abhor too.

    i dont care about religious affiliations. i look at people based on their deeds, so there are good folks who keep the world running and then there are criminals and rascals who are parasites. if a large majority of such criminals claim allegiance to islam or use a particular social networking forum or eat a specific food, that means nothing. basic grouping is that all of them are criminals. you are unnecessarily trying to invent correlation where it doesn't help.

    [–]blues2911 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (4子コメント)

    Basic understanding of english actually. Your uber PC rant seems desperate to prove you don't think islam is the least tolerant religion today.

    any organized religion can be as intolerant and violent as the other

    But they are not, one of them stands out quite clearly.

    [–]linux_shadow 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (2子コメント)

    Your uber PC rant seems desperate to prove you don't think islam is the least tolerant religion today.

    so i should simply say islam is most violent otherwise you will find the comments to be a rant? how does it help if you and I keep saying so - islam is the most violent, christianity is the second, xyz is the third, fourth and so on? this is just going make matters worse.. its us who feed religious groups, so instead of ranking them on their evils a better approach is to ignore all of them at once and let them exist in people's personal spaces.

    But they are not, one of them stands out quite clearly.

    there are shameful examples of violence caused by every religion. you can find them yourself. statistically what you are saying IS correct. but again that doesnt help, you are anyway not going to be able to solve the problem with that insight. my basic point is that beyond a very early stage, acts of crime dont compare with one another. trying to rank them doesnt help in anyway.

    [–]blues2911 -2 ポイント-1 ポイント  (1子コメント)

    Yes, because the first step in solving an issue is accepting that theres a problem. You have countless moderates who keep harping on about islam being the religion of piece, terrorists are not muslims etc but fact of the matter is a much higher number of troublemakers around the globe use islam as an excuse/motivation than any other group.

    If hindu and christian figures and middle classes did not do the same, you would still have rampant issues like child abuse, casteism on a much higher scale and other idiotic practices.

    Other religions have evolved with age, islam still refuses to do so.

    [–]ilovetheuniverse 6 ポイント7 ポイント  (4子コメント)

    Just like the country India, this subreddit is made up of a hindu majority who will hide behind anonymous usernames and condescend other communities thinking they are the most pious human beings ever to walk on earth. They will not respond to an argument constructively but will resort to downvotes and meaningless rhetoric. I have seen so much hatred on this subreddit. Be it towards non hindus or towards people opposing modi. Theyre like the westboro baptist church- only thing is theyre in majority. Disclaimer: I am an atheist. Yes , let the downvotes begin !

    [–]Paranoid__Android 5 ポイント6 ポイント  (0子コメント)

    Fuck you dude. Have you seen how the Hindu community at large behaves towards even minor incident around Muslims? Do you not see an honest effort to call out bullshit on the communal bastards who happen to be Hindu.

    [–]returnme 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

    that is the non-sensical gandhi-waadi talk.. first look to ourless before we point a finger.

    Bajrang Dal etc exist b/c of this imbalance in the society towards muslims. Babri masjid is a building, not people. Don't say that muslims are correct in flaring up riots, but hindus should point at ourselves for destroying Babri. Babri masjid was destroyed when the case dragged on for almost 50 years in the court. Have you heard of any cases against temples that have dragged on for 50 years?

    You are equating Shakaracharyas to Mullahs. Shankaracharyas have no say in the society - they are only gatekeepers of the limits of religion. They can issue any directive but nobody in the society follows them. Mullahs have direct say in conduct of the muslim society - they have the authority to issue fatwas and other stuff that incites muslims into action.

    [–]IndianDude51Don't like me? Press Ctrl+Shift+W to activate Ignore Mode[S] 12 ポイント13 ポイント  (7子コメント)

    DISCLAIMER: please read this reply with a neutral mindset and don't take this as a personal insult to yourself

    But these blood- thirsty people cannot be considered Muslims.

    This statement is wrong on many levels. Your comment reminds me of people who say that terrorists or rapists are not human beings, they are animals. I'm going to say the same thing to you what i say to them.

    Terrorists, murderers, rapists.. they are all human beings, just like you and me. They have the same bodies, the same minds; like you and me. They live in a society and have friends; like you and me.

    And they are affected by their surroundings, like you and me.

    If you are implying that their religion has nothing to do with their violent nature, its is very-very wrong. A person's religious background plays a very important part in shaping his worldviews. It cannot be discounted or brushed off. Just like a person who was born in the house of a poor taxi-driver will have a different mindset compared to a person who born to rich parents and given all the luxuries of life; so will people of different religious backgrounds.

    This reminds of a quote i read- "All Muslims may not be terrorists, but most terrorists are Muslims."

    Please think carefully about what i have said.

    [–]xdesi -1 ポイント0 ポイント  (0子コメント)

    Your response misses the point. Refer to the No True Scotsman fallacy. NTS is the exclusion of data points that don't fit the view.

    Edit: here is another response by me. Instead of trying to argue, you can point out that husainhz7's very statement is flawed, even if nothing you wrote is true. Excluding data points that don't fit the claim is the NTS fallacy and that is exactly what he has committed.

    [–]mavriksfan11 -4 ポイント-3 ポイント  (4子コメント)

    How are most terrorists Muslims?

    Are Naxalites muslims? Was the NKVD Muslim? We're CIA death squads in South America Muslim? We're Pol Pot's Cambodian genociders Muslim? Was Robert Mugabe a Muslim? was Charles Taylor a Muslim? Was Mobutu Sese Saiko a Muslim?

    My friend, people are terrorists, people are Muslims. A person's religion affects their growth but people also affect their religions!

    If a person's religion shapes their thinking and actions, then it must not do so very much. Otherwise we would not have peaceful Hindus and violent Hindus and peaceful Muslims and violent Muslims.

    [–]autodidasker 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (1子コメント)

    What exactly do you mean by religion affecting a person's growth?

    Are you saying that all religions are inherently "good" for the world? Or that they are designed in such a way that the idea prevails even under questioning, even if it requires going to such extents as to removing the questioner?

    [–]mavriksfan11 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

    I was referring to OP's comment:

    A person's religious background plays a very important part in shaping his worldviews.

    I'm most certainly not the kind of person who would have those views you're mentioning.

    [–]IndianDude51Don't like me? Press Ctrl+Shift+W to activate Ignore Mode[S] 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (1子コメント)

    i'm talking about india.

    [–]rsa1 4 ポイント5 ポイント  (0子コメント)

    But these blood- thirsty people cannot be considered Muslims.

    Indeed, they cannot even be considered true Scotsmen.

    [–]xdesi 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

    Those who kill innocents are STRICTLY not Muslims.

    Have you heard of the No True Scotsman fallacy?

    And by your reasoning Aurangzeb was not a true Muslim?

    [–]nlpreddit 4 ポイント5 ポイント  (3子コメント)

    Actually, I feel sorry for how moderates are unfortunately dragged into this mess. There is no doubt that the muslim community has some major brainwashing problems. And there is no doubt that this attitude makes it difficult for others to deal with muslims in general. It is just sad that regular folk who also happen to believe in Islam get dragged into this atmosphere of hatred. But I guess it must be apparent even to guys like you, why the situation is like how it is.

    The only real solution I see for this situation in the future is that people realize that religion in general is just fantasy and become non-religious or treat spirituality as something strictly personal and avoid getting into any organized religion.

    [–]murali1003The real freedom is Islam free India 3 ポイント4 ポイント  (1子コメント)

    Those who kill innocents are STRICTLY not Muslims

    May be you should read ur hadith, read the history books, Islam is violent throughout the history. Its your own view. Good you think like that but its not Islam its Buddhism or Jainism

    [–]ribiy 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

    Dude I really feel for you. You have to defend the indefensible. You have to justify your belief which is questioned by both the hindus like me and extremist muslims. I also fear that if we blame every muslim for what is happening around we will end up losing a lot of your kind of innocent and pure souls too.

    I don't agree with opinion of some that it is your duty to speak against radical muslims and to rein them in. I think as long as you are away from their bullshit you are doing a great job. Your duty is just to yourself and to your immediate family and not to mullahs and to your other hindu countrymen. Just focus on your work and studies and fuck israel, fuck hamas and fuck gaza.

    [–][削除されました]  (1子コメント)

    [deleted]

      [–]Paranoid__Android 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

      Brother, I hope you do realize how frustrated people are getting with the increasing intolerance from Muslims! It is less about what it says in the book and what gets implemented on the streets, no? Hindu scriptures will rarely talk about caste, or Sati system or whatever, but if it does exist Hindus cannot look away from it. Even Hindus like me who just carry a Hindu name but are as far away from religion as one can be.

      I think the world does not see (at large) a widespread Muslim demonstration that is with the message of LOVE and TOLERANCE. All we see is a perpetual look-these-hindu/jew/christian/burmese/chinese/african-bastards-are-bothering-us-again! We see one Muslim country after the other condoning, if not outright supporting deaths for the Danish cartoonist, Bangaleshi writer, Rushdie and what not. This is not new, and people are just BLOODY TIRED of this.

      Thus the conclusion that most people have reached is either * There is a very small sliver of tolerant Muslims or * There is a good sized contingent of SILENT, tolerant (perhaps intolerance condoning) Muslims.

      In either case, that leaves the non-Muslims with little sympathy for the broader Muslim community.

      Combine this with the AVERAGE behavior of any civilized, non-Muslim country and you will see tolerance and equality of rights (to varying degree). Look at the behavior or any (bar Turkey) Muslim majority country and you see no right for Muslims and what not.

      I hate how peripheral Islam is setting me in a set of attitudes that are so negative and full of frustration.

      [–]omaround 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (6子コメント)

      If we follow Quran word by word it does say non-believer be killed.
      http://quran.com/9/5

      [–]husainhz7 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (5子コメント)

      Out of contex, it means as it seems but please read a few verses before and after it

      [–]omaround 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (4子コメント)

      Dude when something is wrong in religious scripture one should be free to question and doubt it. The only problem is when people believe something is hard written and should be followed by closing one eyes I would call it bullshit (it can be of any religion). I can give you a lot more refer here:

      http://quran.com/5/33
      http://quran.com/9/5
      http://quran.com/2/191
      http://quran.com/2/216

      http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/quran/023-violence.htm

      But you are not even ready to question something and then there is a serious issue. Look at above with neutral point of view and you will definitely find glaring loopholes. I am here to have healthy discussion and not hate mongering.

      [–]nlpreddit 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (2子コメント)

      Actually, he is right. It is usually out of context. It asks to kill kafirs in a war between kafirs and muslims. Basically, asking to do battle with the enemy. If you ignore the battle, and just focus on the line which asks to kill kafirs, of course it will sound extremist. My limited point is, please don't go about using this as an argument.

      [–]omaround 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (1子コメント)

      There are also verses in Quran where the husband is allowed to beat his wife if she denies him sex, how can you justify that. I not saying Quran is totally bad but some part are totally wrong and until and unless people from Islam start questioning, they will continue get the hate they are getting. The only way to sound rational is saying I don't believe each and every word said in quran is right (I want this to expected by majority of them). Until that happens I don't have any hope people will not see that as an extremist religion.

      [–]nlpreddit 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

      In the current day and age, of course it doesn't make sense. In the past when it was written, I guess this was seen as progressive. I too think it is a fictional document that provided a code for living a decent life back in the day. And I agree that muslims turning to the quran for explanations and instructions over what modern science and rationality suggests is not good.

      [–]husainhz7 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

      As i have said you place these out of context. I have read these verses previously and thought deeply about these. But these are only commands on for self defense. Not the kind seen nowadays or which is termed as 'jihad'. I son't follow things blindly.

      [–]realrocker 8 ポイント9 ポイント  (1子コメント)

      Cut them some slack. It's hard to get outraged with all the kebabs, biryanis, hot women, secret booze parties, porn videos and other everyday infidel things Indian Muslims indulge in. Won't outrage for what other moronic Muslims do only prove that they are one homogeneous unit? Your belief that Muslims in India are the most violent people is retarded. Seriously you think all the hordes of Salman Khan fan's in Bhopal and Lucknow are focusing on anything else other than their protein bulges. Holy book my ass. Indians Muslims are only as retarded as rest of the Indians.

      Islam(or extremist Islam?) on the other hand is another issue. And IMO every damn religion has the same problems. It's just that Islam has historically the newest followers and enough numbers to matter in global geopolitics. It's impact on India has always been limited. Do you know how I know that? Because after 800 years of Muslim contact India is still dominantly Hindu. It's like common sense.

      Just chill dude. You wastin' your time reading all the incendiary material. Everyday Muslims are becoming non-religious across the country. Same as Hindus, Sikhs, Jains, Christians or other pulp-fictiony-religious-hippies.

      Like four people went to Iraq. Blame all Indian Muslims for it. Really?

      And remember the first rule: To fight a Nut-Job. Don't become a Nut-Job.

      [–]eldaisfishMaratha Pao 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

      And remember the first rule: To fight a Nut-Job. Don't become a Nut-Job.

      Best.

      [–]troll_e_azamBackpack-Wallah 10 ポイント11 ポイント  (2子コメント)

      OP, the site you've linked is a hardcore anti-muslim Christian website. Please refrain from posting such bile here in the future.

      There are some Muslim groups which oppose all this and even protest against it. However they get drowned in the noise.

      And yes more Muslim moderates need to come out of the Community mentality and speak against the wrongs done by extremists in the name of their religion.

      But your post is (probably intentionally) inflammatory and there's no way it is going to lead to a rational discussion.

      [–]karma_hunterIdly Chutney 14 ポイント15 ポイント  (50子コメント)

      How can you request that comments follow reddiquette when you yourself are not doing the same?

      [–]TheOutcastThe mods of this sub are hiterally litler. 4 ポイント5 ポイント  (48子コメント)

      And how did he violate reddiquette here?

      [–]anpkKhadoos -3 ポイント-2 ポイント  (22子コメント)

      first rule: Remember the human. Would he say all this to a muslim's face?

      [–]TheOutcastThe mods of this sub are hiterally litler. 10 ポイント11 ポイント  (21子コメント)

      Why not? Are they not true? I've asked a lot of Muslims these questions in real life. And they have asked similar questions, and foul mouthed Modi more than you can imagine. The questions must be asked.

      [–]rahultheinvader 8 ポイント9 ポイント  (1子コメント)

      OP,

      I don't have a lot of links to lash at you to prove you are wrong. But generalizing an entire community based on isolated incidents are uncalled for.

      For me there are good Hindus, bad Hindus, good Christians, bad Christians, good Muslims, bad Muslims. What I have for you is an incident that happened to my Uncle who still lives in Ahmedabad.

      This was back in late 1980s when riots was commonplace in the city. So once, my uncle and aunt where out shopping in the city. It was just another day, but soon they realized that there was some riot broken our somewhere and there was a mob in the street calling blood. As they were inside a shop this mob just happened to come towards their street. This shopkeeper was a muslim, looking at my scared Uncle and Aunt, he took them to the backroom of his shop and confirmed that the mob has to pass through his dead body before they pass onto his customers. What followed was argument between these shopkeepers and the mob following which the mob dispersed.

      Attack on civilians across the world, irrespective of caste, creed or community needs to be condemned. I understand that our new PM takes the words Vasudeva Kutumbakam by Sarvapallia Radhakrishnan close to his heart. I think we as citizens too need to share this sentiment if we wish to be part of greater community

      [–]eldaisfishMaratha Pao 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

      Moral of the story : Mobs are collections of dumb people or people taking safety in numbers.

      Don't blindly believe dogma which is essentially someone else doing the thinking and forming opinions for you. Think different.

      [–]rahulthewallKadhi Chawal Bhakt 24 ポイント25 ポイント  (16子コメント)

      Dear OP,

      You need better sources of history than Rajiv Dixit and P.N. Oak. You have presented your biased opinions as substantiated facts. You have absolutely no idea of history and you are merely hide your hatred of Islam and Muslims behind a veneer of facts.

      1947- Muslims cause the partition of India.

      Please, go out there and read some history books. Might I recommend Freedom at Midnight to understand how the partition was not just brought about by Muslims and how there were multiple factors at play.

      A number of Muslim leaders in INC opposed partition and a significant number of Muslims decided to stay back in India. Clearly, not all Muslims supported Pakistan. Binary is not the only number system around you know, there are others.

      1948 - Despite being majority, Hindus routinely killed and raped in Hyderabad. No Muslim outrage.

      And how do you know that? Our government intervened and drove out the offenders (let's not get into the manner of intervention).

      1971- Pakistan's muslim army kills lakhs of Hindu men and rapes lakhs of Hindu women . No Muslim outrage.

      Yes, all the Muslims fighting against Pakistani oppression (and recently punished by tribunals in Bangladesh) were not really Muslims.

      1985- A 62 year old muslim woman and her 5 children gets denied maintenance by her husband, due to the pressure of Orthodox Muslim groups. No Muslim outrage.

      There are Muslim women groups who opposed it then, there are many who are fighting for better rights for Muslim women. You won't notice them though, because you are blinded by hate.

      2002- Muslims burn a train full of hindu pilgrims , for no reason at all. No Muslim outrage.

      People condemned both the incidents, yet you only focus on the riots. Also, it is not only Muslims who outrage over the 2002 riots, many do. And rightfully so, the perpetrators of both crimes (train burning and riots) need to be punished. One crime does not justify the other.

      And you go on and on and on, Muslim leaders in India have condemned riots, even taken out fatwas against terrorism but you continue to ignore them.

      Take any prominent riot or mob-violence in the history of India, Muslims are almost always involved. Islam is a violent, fascist cult whose goal is to convert as many people as possible to it. Tolerance is not only absent, it is seen as a weakness that can be taken advantage of. Using derogatory words for individuals that do not belong to their religion is common for Muslims. A sense of superiority and entitlement, however misplaced, is something seen in Indian Muslims all the time. Their holy book declares that world-domination is the ultimate goal of Islam. Convert as many as you can, and kill the rest.

      Your bigoted opinion does not count as facts. Example of a non-Muslim riot: 1984.

      I believe that Muslims are the perpetrators of almost all the violence and civil unrest that this country faces.

      No, they are not. The RSS brought down the Babri Masjid. If the train burning justifies the 2002 response, then RSS' actions in bringing down Babri Masjid justifies the Bombay blasts.

      n the present times, Islam is the single biggest danger that India faces today and must be STRICTLY DEALT WITH, no matter what it takes.

      No, the greatest danger to our country is people like you, who can be easily fooled by our leaders to rally against an entire community on the basis of false victimhood.

      [–]notsosleepy 14 ポイント15 ポイント  (2子コメント)

      Nothing to do with this post, but 'Freedom at midnight' is a completely biased view of events leading up to Indian independence. Their source for Patel and Nehru also wanted independence fast is just the word of Mountbatten who if you read other books will know that fucked up in epic proportions.

      [–]verytroo 7 ポイント8 ポイント  (0子コメント)

      the greatest danger to our country is people like you, who can be easily fooled by our leaders to rally against an entire community on the basis of false victimhood.

      Exactly.

      [–]fapweaklyMort ka Saudagar 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

      Thank you very much for such a thorough and patient response, it was much needed

      [–]1amongmany 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

      thanks. i was waiting for the flip side of OPs argument.

      [–]IndianDude51Don't like me? Press Ctrl+Shift+W to activate Ignore Mode[S] -3 ポイント-2 ポイント  (5子コメント)

      You need better sources of history than Rajiv Dixit and P.N. Oak.

      I had no idea who these people were, till i read your post. All my articles are linked from wikipedia. No random websites.

      the partition was not just brought about by Muslims

      Then why was the subcontinent divided on religious lines? Why is Pakistan an Islamic state? Why did so many Muslims go to Pak and Hindus came here? You are a white faced liar.

      And how do you know that? Our government intervened and drove out the offenders

      Did you read the link i posted? Before the intervention of the government, Hindus were badly being discriminated against by the nizam.

      There are Muslim women groups who opposed it then. You won't notice them though, because you are blinded by hate

      Apparantly the then Congress govt was "binded by hate" too, because AFAIR they didn't pay any attention to the muslim women too? Or is Congress a divine entity that can do no wrong?

      People condemned both the incidents

      no they did not. Any debate on TV before the elections was always focussed on Modi and how the poor Muslims had been murdered by the evil hindus. I never saw a single spokesperson(except from BJP/SS) saying that the train burning was wrong. They all jumped on the "Modi=Hitler" bandwagon. You are lying again.

      Muslim leaders in India have condemned riots

      Only when they start to lose.

      Example of a non-Muslim riot: 1984.

      Thats why i said 'almost' all.

      If the train burning justifies the 2002 response

      I never said that. Stop those strawman arguments.

      No, the greatest danger to our country is people like you, who can be easily fooled by our leaders to rally against an entire community on the basis of false victimhood.

      Lol I am a danger to the country becasue i point out the hypocrisy and fascism-like behaviour of Muslims? Okay.

      Remember me when(god forbid) you or a beloved of yours is beheaded for being a kaffir.

      [–]rahulthewallKadhi Chawal Bhakt -2 ポイント-1 ポイント  (3子コメント)

      Then why was the subcontinent divided on religious lines? Why is Pakistan an Islamic state? Why did so many Muslims go to Pak and Hindus came here? You are a white faced liar.

      Which is why I asked you to read. The partition is a complex affair, but you can go around blaming it on Muslims alone.

      Did you read the link i posted? Before the intervention of the government, Hindus were badly being discriminated against by the nizam.

      By the Nizam, not by all Muslims. The Nizam was a fool, but you can't blame all Muslims for his acts.

      Apparantly the then Congress govt was "binded by hate" too, because AFAIR they didn't pay any attention to the muslim women too? Or is Congress a divine entity that can do no wrong?

      That is beside the point. The Congress committed a grave error but it doesn't deter from the fact that Muslims have opposed the Shah Bano verdict.

      Any debate on TV before the elections was always focussed on Modi and how the poor Muslims had been murdered by the evil hindus. I never saw a single spokesperson(except from BJP/SS) saying that the train burning was wrong. They all jumped on the "Modi=Hitler" bandwagon. You are lying again.

      There are Muslims in BJP too, you know. Obviously, parties opposed to BJP focused on the other side of the issue. That's got nothing to do with Islam or Muslims, but simply politics.

      Only when they start to lose.

      Really? Shows your bigotry and blind hatred.

      Thats why i said 'almost' all.

      I gave you one example, there are others too, like Kandhamal. You probably never heard about them.

      I never said that. Stop those strawman arguments.

      Did I say that you did. Read the complete argument to understand my point.

      Lol I am a danger to the country becasue point the hypocrisy and fascism-like behaviour of Muslims. Okay. Remember me when(god forbid) you or a beloved of yours is beheaded for being a kaffir.

      Yes, you are. Because tomorrow a leader like Babu Bajrangi will come and incite you to murder my countrymen. And you will do it, just like the countless fools before you who have been misled to commit similar acts of terror.

      [–]IndianDude51Don't like me? Press Ctrl+Shift+W to activate Ignore Mode[S] 4 ポイント5 ポイント  (1子コメント)

      Okay. I have 3 NCERT history textbooks for class 12th lying around in my house, i will read them, and get back to you.

      By the Nizam, not by all Muslims.

      facepalm Do you really think rest of the Muslims treated Hindus like brothers when their ruler was committing atrocities against them?

      but it doesn't deter from the fact that Muslims have opposed the Shah Bano verdict.

      lolwut? it was the muslims under whose pressure the Congress govt repealed the SC decision in the first place. And you are saying that muslims opposed the verdict? A few Muslim women may have done so, but most of them were against it.

      That's got nothing to do with Islam or Muslims, but simply politics.

      Fair enough.

      Shows your bigotry and blind hatred.

      I apologise for that statement of mine. It was made without a lot of thought. But i suggest you remember how non-muslims are treated in Islamic countries. No fatwa is ever issued against mistreatment of non-Arabs in Arab countries.

      Yes, you are. Because tomorrow a leader like Babu Bajrangi will come and incite you to murder my countrymen

      Lol, what nonsense. You don't know me well enough to make a statement like that.

      [–][deleted] -1 ポイント0 ポイント  (0子コメント)

      facepalm Do you really think rest of the Muslims treated Hindus like brothers when their ruler was committing atrocities against them?

      So we have to listen and believe to someone's intepretation of what Muslims then did under Nizam rule, instead of looking for historical sources ? Wow. So rational.

      And you are saying that muslims opposed the verdict? A few Muslim women may have done so, but most of them were against it.

      Then acknowledge those few Muslim women. If you can't acknowledge them, then you insult your own reasoning in crimes where Hindus are involved.

      I apologise for that statement of mine. It was made without a lot of thought. But i suggest you remember how non-muslims are treated in Islamic countries. No fatwa is ever issued against mistreatment of non-Arabs in Arab countries.

      This. How the heck does it mean that because some non-Muslims are treated badly in some Islamic countries, Hindus in India should absolutely outrage and pillage and rant and hate Muslims in India ? Reasoning ?

      [–]sudeepj 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

      Yes, you are. Because tomorrow a leader like Babu Bajrangi will come and incite you to murder my countrymen. And you will do it, just like the countless fools before you who have been misled ....

      Wow! The self righteousness is blinding! :-D

      [–]anpkKhadoos -1 ポイント0 ポイント  (2子コメント)

      then RSS' actions in bringing down Babri Masjid justifies the Bombay blasts.

      Nothing justifies killing innocent civilians thousands of kilometers from the original incident.

      edit: I'm stupid as I didn't understand the actual argument.

      [–]rahulthewallKadhi Chawal Bhakt 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (1子コメント)

      Looks like you missed the sarcasm.

      [–]anpkKhadoos 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

      sorry my bad.

      [–]thurkiतेरी कह के लूँगा is what God sings for me everyday 3 ポイント4 ポイント  (2子コメント)

      [–]IndianDude51Don't like me? Press Ctrl+Shift+W to activate Ignore Mode[S] 4 ポイント5 ポイント  (0子コメント)

      google Azad Maidan Riots.

      [–]slowrunner5678 4 ポイント5 ポイント  (0子コメント)

      It's because of bigots like you things like holocaust during the WWII occurred.

      You are dehumanizing a whole set of people based on your bias and allowing hate to perpetuate. So its as easy to manipulate you as much as its easy to manipulate/brainwash the other young muslims. So don't for once think you are above the others when you make such large claims and statements.

      It's very sad to see how shallow your thinking is. And please don't just use wikipedia as your source! Get hold of better reading material!

      Accuracy of wikipedia

      [–]Paranoid__Android 5 ポイント6 ポイント  (1子コメント)

      I hope some of you have read this wonderful article by Jawed Naqvi (Dawn correspondent based out of Delhi)

      [–]digjam 3 ポイント4 ポイント  (1子コメント)

      Let one Muslim answer why the sabarmati express was burnt in first place and then we can have a civil discussion about if they are really bigoted or not.

      Ps. I have asked this question a number of times in this forum and not one person bothered to respond. But they are ready to pounce with stats about how many Muslims were killed in the riots. Bigotry much?

      [–]SAV-v 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

      They have no answer for it that can make them look good

      [–]azfun123 15 ポイント16 ポイント  (12子コメント)

      People like you are the problem. You are exactly like the persons you hate. There is absolutely no difference between them and you.

      2002- Muslims burn a train full of hindu pilgrims, for no reason at all. No Muslim outrage.

      Lot's of muslims died in those riots carried out by right wing hindus like you.

      According to official figures, the riots resulted in the deaths of 790 Muslims and 254 Hindus; 2,500 people were injured non-fatally, and 223 more were reported missing.[9] Other sources estimate that up to 2,000 Muslims died.[10] There were instances of rape, children being burned alive, and widespread looting and destruction of property.

      What about the this massacre?

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naroda_Patiya_massacre

      The Naroda Patiya massacre[b] took place on 28 February 2002 at Naroda,[c] in Ahmedabad, India, during the 2002 Gujarat riots. 97 Muslims were killed by a mob of approximately 5,000 people, allegedly initiated by the Bharatiya Janata Party and the Bajrang Dal.

      When you view gujrat riots you see only the train burning, but you don't see the massive violence committed against muslims where so many muslims died?

      Where's the outrage over that? Did you go and protest in roads against it? You didn't even make a post about it.

      2012- Muslims destroy a war memorial in Mumbai, under the pretext of protesting Assam riots. No Muslim outrage.

      What about babri masjid? The current government wants to build a temple there? Where is the outrage from you?

      2013-Muslims riot in Muzaffarnagar after they kill two Hindu boys for protesting against harassment of their sister. They burn shops, rape women. No Muslim outrage

      Both sides suffered massively. Thousands of muslims were displaced.

      . I don't care if you call me communal, bigoted, right-winged, BJP supporter or whatever.

      Yes you are.

      I DO NOT believe that Muslims are a minority in India.

      Yes they are. Muslims constitute about 14% of the population. I don't know how you can call them majority

      I believe that Muslims are the perpetrators of almost all the violence and civil unrest that this country faces.

      Yeah right. Everything which India faces is caused by muslims according to you. No blame on VHP, Shiv sena etc. No blame on all the rapists. No blame on the caste system or the discrimination which many people face. No blame on the poverty or anything. Every single problem is caused by muslims.

      As far as the palestinian issue goes, it has been going on for many decades and the whole world is outraged at the actions of Israel. It's not just the muslims who support Palestine, thousand of protests are happening across the world. Just check the news.

      If you want what the scholars think about ISIS here are the opinions. People speak out all the time. You just refuse to read the news.

      Read all the opinions from the below link. Hundereds of scholars have condemned ISIS and other terrorist organizations. Most of them are saudi, syria and top scholar from the world.

      http://www.islam21c.com/politics/conclusive-scholarly-opinions-on-isis/

      Sheikh Abdul Aziz al-Fawzan(He is the head of saudi's fatwa committe)

      Sheikh Abdul Aziz al-Fawzan is a member of the Council for Human Rights, a Professor in Islamic Jurisprudence and the Head of the Department of Comparative Jurisprudence at the Islamic University of Imam Muhammad b. Saud in Saudi Arabia.[18] He says:

      “ISIS is a rogue, external criminal organisation. Whoever knows of what afflicted us in Iraq and Afghanistan and the blood that was spilled unjustly at the hands of some ignorant individuals in our nation will understand the gravity of what is happening in Syria.”

      http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Deoband-first-A-fatwa-against-terror/articleshow/3089161.cms

      Saturday's fatwa, signed by Darul-Uloom's grand mufti Habibur Rehman, asserts that "Islam rejects all kinds of unjust violence, breach of peace, bloodshed, murder and plunder and does not allow it in any form".

      Darul uloom deoband the top Islamic institute issued a fatwa against terrorism.

      What exactly makes you think the muslim scholars don't speak out against terrorism? Or do you just not read the news?

      Islam is the single biggest danger that India faces today and must be STRICTLY DEALT WITH, no matter what it takes.

      You are exactly like the muslim extremists. They want to implement their ideology over the world, you want to exterminate islam and muslims from India. What exactly is the difference between you and them?

      You are an extremist, muslim radicals are also extremist. Riots happen because of people like you on both sides. People like you should be kicked out from India.

      People from both sides have suffered because persons like you exist on both sides.

      [–]rahulthewallKadhi Chawal Bhakt 11 ポイント12 ポイント  (3子コメント)

      97 Muslims were killed by a mob of approximately 5,000 people, allegedly initiated by the Bharatiya Janata Party and the Bajrang Dal.

      Not allegedly. Maya Kodnani and Babu Bajrangi are rotting away in prisons after conviction.

      [–]azfun123 4 ポイント5 ポイント  (2子コメント)

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maya_Kodnani

      In December 2002, shortly after 2002 Gujarat riots, she won by a margin of 110,000 votes. In 2007, her margin increased 180,000 votes.[7] After winning the elections in 2007, she was named as Minister for Women and Child Development of Gujarat in Narendra Modi's BJP government,[2] but resigned from the post in 2009 impending her arrest as accused for the Naroda Patiya massacre.

      She was convicted 10 years after she did so many terrible things. She was even elected as women and child development minister by the gujrat government. She won by a massive 180,000 votes in 2007.

      Where exactly was the outrage from 2002 to 2012? People even supported her and appointed her as the minister even though she was the kingpin of the naroda massacre. Where exactly was OP protesting against it?

      [–]autowikibot 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

      Maya Kodnani:


      Maya Kodnani is a former BJP Member of Legislative assembly from Naroda constituency in Gujarat for its 12th legislative assembly and a former Minister for Women and Child Development of Gujarat. She is the first female and first MLA to be convicted in a post-Godhra riots case.


      Interesting: Naroda Patiya massacre | Narendra Modi | Bharatiya Janata Party | 2002 Gujarat riots

      Parent commenter can toggle NSFW or delete. Will also delete on comment score of -1 or less. | FAQs | Mods | Magic Words

      [–]digjam -3 ポイント-2 ポイント  (7子コメント)

      Lot's of muslims died in those riots carried out by right wing hindus like you.

      You still didnt answer why the train was burnt in first place. Everything else that followed was retaliation.

      [–]obvis 3 ポイント4 ポイント  (6子コメント)

      Everything else that followed was retaliation.

      Oh really? Then that totally justifies the butchering of innocent Indians. Here I was thinking killing innocent people was bad. Phew! /s

      [–]kwantize 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

      Islamic State advertises war crimes in video commemorating end of Ramadan

      Read more: http://www.longwarjournal.org/archives/2014/07/islamic_state_advert.php#ixzz38sJanra4

      [–]parlor_tricks 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (5子コメント)

      This is a ridiculous question.

      This is like an American asking other Americans "where is the Indian outrage on rape"

      [–]fscker 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (4子コメント)

      And we could show them examples of Indian outrage on rape.

      Where is muslim outrage on the violent marches and protests and death threats after the Danish Cartoon Mohammed incident? I have actually seen a lot of muslim intellecutals justify what happened afterwards.

      [–]bhaiyamafkaroyou are just blinded by hate 6 ポイント7 ポイント  (2子コメント)

      The problem with Muslims is they think they are more closely related to middle east than India.

      [–]wromit 5 ポイント6 ポイント  (0子コメント)

      Surely you're going to back that profound observation about 150 million people with a reputable source or a survey.

      [–][deleted] -2 ポイント-1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

      The problem with Hindutvawadis is that they care more about temples than toilets and more about incidents from 15th century than those from 2000 to 2013 (Naxalites to Nirbhaya)

      [–]mavriksfan11 4 ポイント5 ポイント  (2子コメント)

      Do me a favor OP,

      Look at the banner of this subreddit. Now look at your words. Do your words match up with the spirit of this subreddit?

      Can you not understand that "Muslims" are a large group of people, and they do not all act and think the same but when you lump them together as if they do, then you are the one causing problems?

      Do you think you do not have any prejudice against Muslims at all? That if these are truly words you believe you will be able to live with Muslims alongside you as brothers? I don't think so. If you are going to judge every Muslim you see based on these things you've written above (which many of them have nothing to do with) then how can you expect peace and civility among and with them?

      Why is it surprising that Muslims are sometimes violent agitators and sometimes victims of violence (just as Hindus are)? Islam (and Hinduism) deal with violence, and they deal with peace because they are religions for people and people are violent and people are peaceful.

      Your post isn't enlightening to anyone, all you are doing is spreading hate towards people you do not know. There are peaceful Muslims and violent ones, and there are peaceful BJP members and violent ones. Parties and religions and groups are all made of people, and if you do not account for that diversity then you will never be able to deal with other kinds of people. There are mullahs who speak against violence (the Bohra syedna, is one I can think of), and there are mullahs who provoke it, just like there are politicians who speak against violence and those who promote it.

      We cannot have outrage all the time. There isn't enough time in each day to outrage over every bad person in the world, but for every bad action there are some who are outraged regardless of religion or any other silly grouping factor.

      OP, again, look at your words, look at the banner of this subreddit. Does this post belong here?

      [–]libyaitalia 5 ポイント6 ポイント  (1子コメント)

      Yes but bro, the 15% of India is to blame for every single misery in India! Dont listen to your pro-Qatar gulfstate arab islamic media! India would be a rich and great nation of like no other, but those darn pesky muslims are slowing us!

      It's not the criminals, rapists, psychopaths, thieves, murderers, extremists, fraudsters, corrupted system members or others, its the MUSLIMS!

      May I quote OP to prove further my legitimate point!

      A sense of superiority and entitlement, however misplaced, is something seen in Indian Muslims all the time.

      As an euphoric Indian, I agree with this. Fucking 177 million entitled smugs...I would know, I RESEARCH my stuff unlike them! Fools!

      Their holy book declares that world-domination is the ultimate goal of Islam. Convert as many as you can, and kill the rest.

      Yes, we can clearly see this from nowadays news! Look at the muslims! Wars! Poverty! Must be them and their religion!

      Let me state my opinion loud and clear. I don't care if you call me communal, bigoted, right-winged, BJP supporter or whatever.

      Yes! Strong shall we be!

      I DO NOT believe that Muslims are a minority in India. I absolutely DO NOT believe that they are oppressed, poor, innocent souls that are the victims of the the majority community all the time

      Wha-YES, okay! Muslims are majority of India! Fuck data and statistics and surveys!

      believe that Muslims are the perpetrators of almost all the violence and civil unrest that this country faces. Their arrogance and intolerance is what is wrong with them. In the present times, Islam is the single biggest danger that India faces today and must be STRICTLY DEALT WITH, no matter what it takes.

      Wholeheartedly agree, as a fellow euphoric Indian those smug 177 million innoc-I mean VIOLENT people should be banished of this great nation of Ours!

      EDIT: So many anti-India pro-Saudi apologists in this thread, disgusting!

      [–]coldcoldnovemberrain 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

      Good one! Enough reddit for the day.

      [–]stinkybreadits bread not beard 6 ポイント7 ポイント  (1子コメント)

      You Internet Warrior. You are only speaking to mirrors over here. Say what you said on the street if you have the balls to call muslims out.

      India is a lost cause irrespective of muslims. Plus the one thing in common is how muslims behave across the world. So its not a problem centralised to India. An ideological change is required which Islam is heavily insulated against. So its only going to be decades of education to make them not care about religion as much.

      [–]OldNewsDiscoveredonlytruthiscool 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

      Just wait for a few more years.

      A culture, religion or civilization that is based regressive ideologies is bound to shrink and ultimately fade away sans reform.

      change is inevitable in such circumstances. The sad thing is I do not see even one of these muslims come out and protest terrorism and jihad like they protest gaza violence across the world.

      This is the beginning of the end for islam, if muslims (not the sickularists abound here) do not transform their own brothers (as they refer their religion followers) and tear off some of the racist pages in kuran.

      [–]kwantize 4 ポイント5 ポイント  (0子コメント)

      Dear Muslim Redditors, every belief system on earth has parts that are either totally fucked up or ar anachronistic. The adherents of every system--but one--are free to OPENLY criticise and REJECT these parts and evolve a new, more relevant iteration of the system. In the case of ISLAM ALONE, no criticism can be entertained. The Quran and the Prophet have to be accepted as perfect and immutable. Whenever something happens that invites criticism from others, the ONLY RESPONSE POSSIBLE is: 'it is unislamic! Those people are not true Muslims'. It's time to get your heads out of your butts and accept that the Quran and Prophet are imperfect--just as with every other Book and Prophet out there. Else NO PROGRESS IS POSSIBLE. Islam will remain strong until it crumbles suddenly one day.

      [–]SAV-v 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

      I completely agree, this is what I've been trying to say on here. Most redditors here see anti-Muslim comments and immediately start screaming hate without thinking that the feelings may be justified due to India's historical and ongoing relationship with Muslims. Yes India is a tolerant state and has always been one but Muslims in general don't see tolerance as something to aspire to or emulate, they see it as a weakness to be exploited on the path to turning yet another country into an Islamic one. To see evidence of this even outside of India just look at the actions Muslims take in western countries in which they achieve even somewhat of a significant proportion of the population.

      [–]mightymkholy shit its real 3 ポイント4 ポイント  (1子コメント)

      Okay first off... I don't agree with you OP on your views... remove your bigoted specs and look at the world its grey in nature and hindus are as hardline as muslims are..... Though i do have a question for my muslim brothers.... I do want to know why is the islam as a religion at war with literally all the religions.... Wherever there is religious unrest in the world invariably it is between muslims and another religion... e. g India - muslims-hindus Myanmar - muslims - budhist Africa - multiple locations are at war between muslims, Christians and local tribes Iraq - muslims - muslims My post is not to incite hatred... I just want to understand the root of this conflict between islam and literally all the other religions....

      [–]wromit 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

      There is no one size fits all answer. If you care enough, pick any one conflict from iraq, libya, palestine, etc and read at least the wikipedia page for it. Pretty much all conflicts have distinct historical/social/political causes. Religion is used as a catalyst to energize each side. The underlying grievances and motivations are different. Khalifachosen-by-sharia-counselchosen-by-unknown

      [–]gg12345Foreign funded agent 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

      Love is a superpower.

      [–]Mufwrath 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

      There is an assumption that all muslims should be accountable for the fanatic activities of the few. When muslims are asked to address the crimes by their so called brothers and sisters, many don't deny the wrong-doings or the severity of those specific events. How do you suppose innocent muslims react to the horrible crimes done by the fanatics? The same innocent, civil muslims who are outraged also are afraid of what this means for the image of their religion. and that's why they are trying to live their lives by distancing themselves from the violent deluded ones. When they do voice out their outrage, it is true that they do so when they see an injustice done to their own people. What is wrong with that?? People will react strongly to the perceived harm to themselves and that is true of any religion, culture and race. Not to mention how the muslim communities will be mostly focused on bringing justice to themselves and will be more drawn towards news that validates why they deserve a fairer treatment, instead of ravaging the newspaper each day to look for instances of crimes done by other crazy muslims

      [–]goddamit_iamwasted -1 ポイント0 ポイント  (1子コメント)

      Somewhere a Britisher is having a nice laugh over this Hindu Muslim shit. Accha hai lado maro.

      [–]eldaisfishMaratha Pao 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

      Well, they started it.

      [–][削除されました]  (1子コメント)

      [deleted]

        [–]SAV-v 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

        They have no explanation for it that doesn't make them look bigoted themselves

        [–]Callcutta1Son of Gandhi : I am not a Gandhist 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

        I DO NOT believe that Muslims are a minority in India. I absolutely DO NOT believe that they are oppressed, poor, innocent souls that are the victims of the the majority community all the time. I

        This is right and i feel people do it to keep Hindu responses to these actions at a low, yet, there are Muslims that do outrage at their extreem counter parts doings. They are there but you are not hearing them. Go into a mosque though, and there will be thousands of them.

        [–]eldaisfishMaratha Pao 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

        Take me down to the Hindu Madrassa where the muslims are greedy and the cows eat honey,

        Oh won't you please take my tome!

        [–]diamondjim -1 ポイント0 ポイント  (1子コメント)

        Maybe that's because the people protesting against the Gaza occupation are the same class of Muslims who attacked the train at Godhra or vandalized the war memorial in Mumbai. I don't expect much protesting from them against the actions of their own kind.

        [–]rphyadav 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

        We should not generalise our opinions across religions or regions. Half the world's problems are due to people who generalise. We should note that only a handful of people from every religion or region are ruffians. We should not paint all Muslims, Hindus, Christians and so on with the same brush. When we do that, we become more evil than the people we blame. Be sensible, Indians. Spread love, not hatred.

        [–]najyolo -4 ポイント-3 ポイント  (3子コメント)

        Wow. Such deluded hate. The anti - Muslim brigade could maybe spread a little love around than cherry picking and spreading lies and hate?

        Maybe you should talk about how Islam encourages charity and compassion... wait they don't pay ya'll for that? Do they?

        And remember when you generalize a 1.8bn sect on the basis of a small group amongst them... you are no better than the so called Muslims who spread violence and hatred. You're just following their footsteps and claim to have a higher moral ground.

        [–]regrettor 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (2子コメント)

        Muslims in India are protesting against Israel. They are not protesting about Syria, ISIS, Al Qaeda etc. That's his point, and it's completely valid.

        [–]najyolo 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (1子コメント)

        That's your point, not his. Anyway ISIS and all other terrorist organizations are condemned by every Muslim possible. Public protests are not held because they are not a state. They are terrorists. You can't reason with terrorists. There are no pro-ISIS lobbies in America or anywhere. They are condemned by everyone. While Israel is supported by the US to a large extent and many countries too.

        Don't you think you're at fault when you dehumanize the Palestinians? Support Israel and then blame Muslims for not standing up to ISIS?

        [–]regrettor 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

        ISIS and all other terrorist organizations are condemned by every Muslim possible.

        Seriously? Every muslim? It was in the news last week that a bunch of middle class muslim men disappeared to join ISIS. There is support in India. And for every one who joins ISIS, there are probably a thousand who support their choice.

        Don't you think you're at fault when you dehumanize the Palestinians?

        That's a big assumption. Did I say that I support Israel? I've never said that, publicly or on the internet. I don't even know 1% of the facts, and I understand that it's an incredibly complex situation. Which is why I don't support Israel or Palestine. I do hate it when people make statements that Israel is oppressing Palestine and don't even attempt to discuss the flip side of the situation.