あなたは単独のコメントのスレッドを見ています。

残りのコメントをみる →

[–]Hrel 92 ポイント93 ポイント  (42子コメント)

Yeah, all the risk is on the male, don't take any chances with that shit.

[–]notmyrealusernamme 39 ポイント40 ポイント  (41子コメント)

If either party is of the age of consent, yet both are still minors, there is typically close-age clause which grants leeway of (usually) three years. So OP's son should be in the ok.

[–]Hrel -28 ポイント-27 ポイント  (40子コメント)

I think age of consent should simply not apply if the people involved are within 10 years of each other. I mean, if they're dating it shouldn't even be possible for the guy to have his life ruined because the teenage girls parents don't like it. But that's exactly the situation now.

We're all extremely different, we're individuals. In terms of maturity level it's totally feasible that a 15 year old girl and 25 year old guy could be "right" for each other. Furthermore, regardless of what the law says, people are going to do whatever it is that they want to do. So, the way I see it, it's better to keep everything in the light of day, than hidden down in some "sub-culture".

Transparency, the more I think about it the more I think it's the first, best, last, only solution to most of the world's governing problems.

I'd rather have my niece be upfront with me, and introduce me to an older boyfriend than to sneak around and do "who knows what" with him. If I can meet him and it's common for her to tell me about their relationship I can do a MUCH more effective job of protecting her than if she's afraid to talk about it because she doesn't want to "Get in trouble".

It's just a general rule that applies to all things, If people WANT to do it they are going to. So the job of an authority figure, the government here, is to figure out the best way for people to do it. It's to go "hey, you want to do this thing that's potentially really dangerous, so here's an outline of the safest way to do that potentially really dangerous thing."

Life without danger isn't life, it's stagnation. So danger is a part of life. So to ban, or make dangerous things illegal is doomed to fail. The best option is to simply encourage the activity, while teaching the safest possible way to exercise said activity.

TL;DR IT's better to teach "safe sex" than "no sex".

[–]pgh9fan 23 ポイント24 ポイント  (39子コメント)

I have to disagree. A 21-year-old should not be dating an 11-year-old.

Edit: A 21..., not I 21....

[–]Hrel -41 ポイント-40 ポイント  (38子コメント)

Right, for you specifically that's true.

100 years from now? Between 2 totally different people? Who knows!

The way kids are going they'll be hitting puberty at 5. In a world where 11 year olds look like modern day 25 year olds who's to say an 11 year old and a 21 year old shouldn't be together? No one.

[–]koreanwizard 21 ポイント22 ポイント  (30子コメント)

Keep telling yourself that dude, your not a pedophile, your a sexual maven

[–][削除されました]  (29子コメント)

[deleted]

    [–]newusername01142014 3 ポイント4 ポイント  (4子コメント)

    Your thoughts became invalid the second you posted on /r/theredpill

    [–]hmmwhyarethesesohard 3 ポイント4 ポイント  (22子コメント)

    I think what /u/koreanwizard is trying to say is that you're a creep. Hands down. Just because a body is sexually mature doesn't mean the mind is. In any acceptable culture dating someone who is incapable of properly making a sexual decision is a no go. Is it true that a male of say 25 could still be immature enough to be at the same mental state as a 15 year old female...? Sure. But that certainly doesn't make it right for him to fuck her. I have a feeling no matter what you do in life you'll be lonely, whether it's locked in a jail cell for statutory rape or in your mother's basement because you're a social pariah, I don't know.... But whatever the case, you may want to re-evaluate the way you think about things.

    EDIT: Furthermore, your knowledge of the words pedophile and ephebophile lead me to believe your taste in little girls has come under scrutiny before.

    [–]nope_nic_tesla 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

    The guy is a moderator of /r/efebofile. His entire philosophy (in the case of ephebophilia and with "the red pill") is an attempt at justifying pathological tendencies instead of confronting and dealing with them.

    [–]crstov 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

    I would prefer to be an uneducated guy than you at this stage. But wait, I have multiple degrees and disagree with you also, so I suppose education is not determinative of this issue.

    [–]Kindern 5 ポイント6 ポイント  (4子コメント)

    Go read up on the principle of informed consent before you have it explained to you by a judge.

    [–]breadfollowsme 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (0子コメント)

    Looking like a 21 year old does not mean that an 11 year old has the understanding of consequences that a 21 year old does. This should go without saying.... unless you are 14 and want to get with 24 year olds which is I'm guessing what is going on right now?

    [–]GearyDigit 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

    Okay pedophile.