Proceedings of the National Academy of Scienceswww.pnas.org
  • Go to PNAS Homepage
  • > Current Issue
  • > vol. 111 no. 31
  • > Frank J. Tipler,  11281–11286, doi: 10.1073/pnas.1324238111

Quantum nonlocality does not exist

  1. Frank J. Tipler1
  1. Department of Mathematics, Tulane University, New Orleans, LA 70118
  1. Edited* by John P. Perdew, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, and approved June 2, 2014 (received for review December 30, 2013)

Significance

I show that quantum nonlocality is an artifact of the assumption that observers obey the laws of classical mechanics, whereas observed systems obey quantum mechanics. Locality is restored if observed and observer both obey quantum mechanics, as in the many-worlds interpretation (MWI). Using the MWI, I show that the quantum side of Bell’s inequality is entirely local. Thus, experiments confirming “nonlocality” are actually confirming the MWI. The mistaken interpretation of Bell’s inequality depends on the idea that the wave function is a probability amplitude, but the MWI holds that the wave function is a world density amplitude. Assuming the wave function is a world density amplitude, I derive the Born interpretation directly from Schrödinger’s equation.

Abstract

Quantum nonlocality is shown to be an artifact of the Copenhagen interpretation, in which each observed quantity has exactly one value at any instant. In reality, all physical systems obey quantum mechanics, which obeys no such rule. Locality is restored if observed and observer are both assumed to obey quantum mechanics, as in the many-worlds interpretation (MWI). Using the MWI, I show that the quantum side of Bell’s inequality, generally believed nonlocal, is really due to a series of three measurements (not two as in the standard, oversimplified analysis), all three of which have only local effects. Thus, experiments confirming “nonlocality” are actually confirming the MWI. The mistaken interpretation of nonlocality experiments depends crucially on a question-begging version of the Born interpretation, which makes sense only in “collapse” versions of quantum theory, about the meaning of the modulus of the wave function, so I use the interpretation based on the MWI, namely that the wave function is a world density amplitude, not a probability amplitude. This view allows the Born interpretation to be derived directly from the Schrödinger equation, by applying the Schrödinger equation to both the observed and the observer.

Footnotes

  • Author contributions: F.J.T. performed research and wrote the paper.
  • The author declares no conflict of interest.
  • *This Direct Submission article had a prearranged editor.

Online Impact

Picked up by 1 news outlets
Blogged by 1
Tweeted by 7
0 readers on Mendeley
0 readers on CiteULike
  • Add to FacebookFacebook
  • Add to TwitterTwitter
  • Add to Google+Google+
  • Add to CiteULikeCiteULike
  • Add to DeliciousDelicious
  • Add to DiggDigg
  • Add to MendeleyMendeley

This Issue


Cover
 

Don't Miss






Published online before print July 11, 2014, doi: 10.1073/pnas.1324238111
PNAS August 5, 2014 vol. 111 no. 31 11281-11286


Access



Semantically Related Articles

Physical Sciences: Physics:
  • B. Misra ,
  • I. Prigogine ,
  • and M. Courbage
Lyapounov variable: Entropy and measurement in quantum mechanics PNAS 1979 76 (10) 4768 - 4772
Physical Sciences: Physics:
  • Walter M. Elsasser
THEORY OF QUANTUM-MECHANICAL DESCRIPTION PNAS 1968 59 (3) 738 - 744
Physics:
  • J. R. Oppenheimer
On the Quantum Theory of the Autoelectric Field Currents PNAS 1928 14 (5) 363 - 365
Physical Sciences - Physics:
  • Wolfgang P. Schleich ,
  • Daniel M. Greenberger ,
  • Donald H. Kobe ,
  • and Marlan O. Scully
Schrödinger equation revisited PNAS 2013 110 (14) 5374 - 5379 ; published ahead of print March 18, 2013, doi:10.1073/pnas.1302475110
Physics:
  • R. B. Lindsay and
  • R. J. Seeger
Operational Calculus in Quantum Mechanics. Some Critical Comments and the Solution of Special Problems PNAS 1930 16 (3) 196 - 205
Mathematics:
  • Neal H. McCoy
On the Function in Quantum Mechanics Which Corresponds to a Given Function in Classical Mechanics PNAS 1932 18 (11) 674 - 676
Profile:
  • William D. Phillips
2012 Nobel Laureates in Physics PNAS 2013 110 (18) 7110 - 7111 ; published ahead of print April 12, 2013, doi:10.1073/pnas.1221825110
NAS, National Academy of Sciences
HighWire Press, Stanford University
PNAS
PNAS

PNAS Online is distributed with the assistance of
HighWire Press® | Online ISSN 1091-6490
Copyright © 2014 National Academy of Sciences. Website by Boston Interactive
Click to get updates and verify authenticity.
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%