Having a functional government with safety nets and protections for those who can't protect themselves is part of what we consider essential to an alternative. You'll never convince me to accept an alternative that is better for me and worse for those who need the most help.

But this is where things just come down to a differing of opinion. Left anarchists and anarcho-capitalists (two very different ideologies btw) would both agree that those in need of help would be better off without governments. So statists and non-statists are both making assumptions about how the destitute are better off with regards to government. These arguments just go in circles because it is impossible to test these assumptions empirically.

So the reality is you like the status quo and alternatives presented are not convincing to you. You are absolutely entitled to your opinion, but given that it is just an opinion, it's not really fair to dismiss anyone's opinion that is different from yours as non-alternatives. They are alternatives, you just don't like them.