Proceedings of the National Academy of Scienceswww.pnas.org

Quantum nonlocality does not exist

  1. Frank J. Tipler1
  1. Department of Mathematics, Tulane University, New Orleans, LA 70118
  1. Edited* by John P. Perdew, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, and approved June 2, 2014 (received for review December 30, 2013)

Significance

I show that quantum nonlocality is an artifact of the assumption that observers obey the laws of classical mechanics, whereas observed systems obey quantum mechanics. Locality is restored if observed and observer both obey quantum mechanics, as in the many-worlds interpretation (MWI). Using the MWI, I show that the quantum side of Bell’s inequality is entirely local. Thus, experiments confirming “nonlocality” are actually confirming the MWI. The mistaken interpretation of Bell’s inequality depends on the idea that the wave function is a probability amplitude, but the MWI holds that the wave function is a world density amplitude. Assuming the wave function is a world density amplitude, I derive the Born interpretation directly from Schrödinger’s equation.

Abstract

Quantum nonlocality is shown to be an artifact of the Copenhagen interpretation, in which each observed quantity has exactly one value at any instant. In reality, all physical systems obey quantum mechanics, which obeys no such rule. Locality is restored if observed and observer are both assumed to obey quantum mechanics, as in the many-worlds interpretation (MWI). Using the MWI, I show that the quantum side of Bell’s inequality, generally believed nonlocal, is really due to a series of three measurements (not two as in the standard, oversimplified analysis), all three of which have only local effects. Thus, experiments confirming “nonlocality” are actually confirming the MWI. The mistaken interpretation of nonlocality experiments depends crucially on a question-begging version of the Born interpretation, which makes sense only in “collapse” versions of quantum theory, about the meaning of the modulus of the wave function, so I use the interpretation based on the MWI, namely that the wave function is a world density amplitude, not a probability amplitude. This view allows the Born interpretation to be derived directly from the Schrödinger equation, by applying the Schrödinger equation to both the observed and the observer.

Footnotes

  • Author contributions: F.J.T. performed research and wrote the paper.
  • The author declares no conflict of interest.
  • *This Direct Submission article had a prearranged editor.

Online Impact

Picked up by 1 news outlets
Blogged by 1
Tweeted by 4
0 readers on Mendeley
0 readers on CiteULike
  • Add to FacebookFacebook
  • Add to TwitterTwitter
  • Add to Google+Google+
  • Add to CiteULikeCiteULike
  • Add to DeliciousDelicious
  • Add to DiggDigg
  • Add to MendeleyMendeley
Current Issue
 

Don't Miss

PNAS announces its participation in SocialCite, a new tool that improves the citation network by allowing you to provide feedback about the validity and quality of citations.



Published online before print July 11, 2014, doi: 10.1073/pnas.1324238111
PNAS July 11, 2014


Access



Semantically Related Articles

NAS, National Academy of Sciences
HighWire Press, Stanford University
PNAS
PNAS

PNAS Online is distributed with the assistance of
HighWire Press® | Online ISSN 1091-6490
Copyright © 2014 National Academy of Sciences. Website by Boston Interactive
Click to get updates and verify authenticity.
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%