all 9 comments

[–]pilkie02 2 ポイント3 ポイント

The one guy in there "follows the money" back to Anonymous. Dun dun DUUUUUUNNNNNNN

[–]Shredder13.. HAARP meteorologist 1 ポイント2 ポイント

That mod is anti-science. Pay no attention to his ramblings.

[–]redping 3 ポイント4 ポイント

can't believe he used the word credibility about himself. Dude runs away from arguments daily, just spams links to anti-vaccine shit and once said that he would not engage with me unless I read some awful book written by some homeopathic alt-medicine shill. Suzanne Humphries I believe was the author. Maybe her book is what corrupted him originally or something.

[–]Shredder13.. HAARP meteorologist 1 ポイント2 ポイント

If he believes so much in this nonsense, I'm guessing something like medical malpractice happened in his past.

[–]redping 2 ポイント3 ポイント

That or he's just really dumb, or has some kind of weird goal to spread disease like he's playing a RL version of Plague Inc

[–]Shredder13.. HAARP meteorologist 1 ポイント2 ポイント

True. But why attribute to malice that which could be explained by stupidity?

[–]P51Mike1980 0 ポイント1 ポイント

You should have countered and told him to read the book "Deadly Choices" by Paul Offit (anti-vaxers HATE him).

[–]Antivaccination[S] 1 ポイント2 ポイント

http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/early/2014/06/26/peds.2014-1079.full.pdf+html

That's the link to the actual study. It's a literature review and therefor costs are relatively small.

On page 13, in the financial disclosures section it says "The authors have indicated they have no financial relationships relevant to this article to disclose." Now, the tards will have you believe that this is some grand conspiracy and that if they don't have to disclose it they don't have to. This is true, somewhat, but a reputable journal like Pediatrics wouldn't allow it.

ETA: Correction to the title: the study was paid for by the Agency for Health Research and Quality, US Department of Health and Human Services. It was not paid for by "big pharma."

[–]logicordie 3 ポイント4 ポイント

But we all know big pharm has the US gov in its pocket, right?