I just don't understand people who loudly run their mouths clearly before even attempting to do any research.

Like, you haven't even tried.

I feel like this is common knowledge, but I'll say it again, just for you.

The foreskin has 3 major functions. It 1) contains thousands of nerve endings 2) mobilizes the skin of the penis, important for many aspects of sexuality and 3) protects the head of the penis, just as the clitoral hood protects the clitoris.

From your very own link

should be considered an efficacious intervention for HIV prevention in countries and regions with heterosexual epidemics, high HIV and low male circumcision prevalence

None of which are true for the US.

I hope you prove me wrong, but you seem to me to be the sort of person that pits women's right's/causes against men's. Many men on the other side are guilty of the same thing. Why? I see a lot of MRA vs feminist bickering and it achieves nothing. We should all be banding together to achieve the goal of human rights for all.

Blah, blah, blah, this is getting very kum-ba-yah. But anyway, using this issue as an example, why does it have to be an argument about which is worse. Why can only one of them be bad?

This is getting too long. tl;dr: oppose non-consensual genital cutting for all, regardless of sex.