1
21
22

/r/ShitStatistsSay blatantly brigading an /r/Chicago thread (np.reddit.com)

submitted by circleandsquare

all 13 comments
sorted by:
best
best
トップ
新着
注目
論争中
古い順

[–]ColeYote 15 ポイント16 ポイント

And yet they have a lot of crossover with the community that thinks flouride in the water is a mind-control thing.

While we're talking about SSS, have they actually answered the question of "who builds the roads"? Because I think that's kind of something you have to do before you turn it into an objection that only deserves to be laughed at.

[–]FullClockworkOddessy 4 ポイント5 ポイント

They laugh at it because they're scared of it. Because the second people know that they have no answer to it they're abandoning ship at record speed.

[–]Halgrind 2 ポイント3 ポイント

You fail to see the genius behind an-cap. The fundamental belief is that once the system is in place, everything works itself out.

Therefore, of course roads will be built! People need roads, and an unregulated market is infinitely more efficient than a statist government, and the statist government builds roads, therefore an-cap roads will be built cheaper and better than statist roads. Also, we won't need drunk driving or safety laws because I can just sue you if you crash into me, and if you kill me I can use my assassin insurance to assassinate you so people will self-regulate their driving habits.

[–]frezik 2 ポイント3 ポイント

Did you see the video about Max, Nebraska? The answer is that the roads will be dirt, and holes will be filled in by passing grandmas.

[–]Righteousbros 1 ポイント2 ポイント

They think private entities will build and maintain the hundereds of thousands of miles of highway, bridges, and tunnells "because the free market needs them."

I wish I were joking.

[–]Mc_B 7 ポイント8 ポイント

Meet the average internet libertarian/ancap... Big business supporters! Fuck the external costs!

[–]I_eat_tampons 6 ポイント7 ポイント

So even after studies showing that small beads are directly affecting wildlife and indirectly human lives they still don't think they should be banned? Such dense assholes

[–]withdeer 5 ポイント6 ポイント

"What studies? Please list them all so that I can just ignore them. Please go through the trouble of doing this for me plz."

[–]Barboski 2 ポイント3 ポイント

That motherfucker really rustled my jimmies. I gave up when I realized that he was anti-surgery

[–]GeneralTapioca 1 ポイント2 ポイント

What the what? Does he think that the surgical removal of a thyroid nodule or a cancerous cyst is somehow impeding cancer's self-actualization and agency?

Or is it something less sophisticated, like the government is secretly implanting chips in your butt when you go in for hemorrhoid removal?

[–]FullClockworkOddessy 6 ポイント7 ポイント

Who cares about people when the bottom line exists?

Ancaps: what happens when cartoon supervillains enter the real world.

[–]frezik 2 ポイント3 ポイント

This shouldn't even need a high level of evidence; dumping a bunch of plastic beads into the waterways is probably not a good thing. Sure, study it just to double check, but it won't take much to prove the case.

[–]Mc_B 5 ポイント6 ポイント

/u/snex00 is so bloody stupid... holy crap! The fact he even has any up votes makes me cry