“Check your privilege” meme and why it is ineffective

check-your-privilege

Okay, this has been bothering me ENORMOUSLY.

I talk about racism a LOT.  I also blog a lot.  For the entire duration of my social justice life I have never EVER used, “Check your privilege”.  I didn’t even hear of the expression until a few months ago when a dude asked me, “Oh, you aren’t one of those ‘Check your privilege’ types, are you?”

At that point I had no idea what he was talking about.  I confessed I had never heard of it. It’s not entirely offensive, but it’s generally a useless statement (I will explain later).

Then in the last month, I’ve seen a lot of “Check your privilege” haters on social media.  Let me explain that I feel like I’m probably part of the most radical of the anti-racist (and feminist) movement and pretty far-in with knowing what the true inspirational movement leaders (organic intellectuals and academics) have been saying about anti-racism (and feminism), and I have NEVER EVER heard any of them use the words “Check your privilege”.

I really, honestly, have NEVER read anything by a legitimate anti-racist (OR Feminist) person who has used those words, let alone flaunt it.

So I had to google what this craze was about on knowyourmeme.com

Apparently, “Check your privilege” was first used in 2006 as a probe for talking about what it means to be privileged.  I could see how these words came to life because when we are talking about systemic privilege, it is sometimes dubious to someone who doesn’t experience discrimination on the daily.  Understanding where you are positioned in the world, and how it affects your daily interactions (either gaining you privilege or barring you through discrimination), is an important part of how people (with privilege) understand the experiences of people who don’t have the same privileges.  The exercise draws on empathetic response to understand the resources people with privilege have attained by just being born in their skin and class position.  The exercise is to demonstrate that the society we are born into already has a “structure”.  This structure is better suited for some people (usually the people who historically created it in their favour) and how it fails to appreciate the lived differences of others and how that structure becomes a barrier to others’.

Now, this starts spreading in 2007 on a few feminist blogs and social justice social media.  As of 2011 it begins to also be used to satirize the liberal arts-college-social justice blogger who considers themselves as more “enlightened” than the rest of their Facebook friends.

Image

My stance:

I am not against the use of “Check your privilege”, but we have to appreciate that it just isn’t very effective.  Social justice isn’t learned in a day and it certainly won’t be learned in a status update where it makes you stop and say, “Oh heck…sorry, I forgot I was a cis, upper-middle class, White male in the global North”.

Anti-oppression workshops, that I’ve helped facilitate for about a decade now, happen over the course of 4-7 whole days.  And that is only Anti-oppression 101.  This is a long process of understanding where you are situated and understanding that everyone experiences the world differently.  It is a very intensive experience to have people realize new things about themselves and their friends.  Moreover, it is a very intensive experience for them to develop a new way of moving in the world and appreciating that, sometimes, systemic and structural oppressions make individuals look like they have deficits, when really- it is the failure of a system that privileges some and leaves others in the dust.  Anti-oppression practice is a commitment to work in the world differently; practice differently; and having an appreciation that all these shifts in worldview cannot be reduced to a meme like, “Check your privilege”.

Now, I understand why many people may be frustrated with this meme.  It’s almost like an accusation that you’re an asshole.  And worse- you were born an asshole because, for the most part, YOU didn’t choose to be a cis, White male.  I get it.  But the point of understanding Privileges and Oppressions are not to vilify you as an individual, but be aware of a system that creates inequities.  “Check your privilege”, should NEVER be used as a personalized accusation.  What it might be used as is a way to talk about why you, at the moment, may not be acting as the most empathetic person right now because you do not have intimate experiential knowledge of a consistent structural disadvantage another person faces.

These meme one-offs too often get obscured from their history and original intent.  They get thrown around as if BAM- I’m gonna slap you with a few choice words and you’re gonna be Lawyer’d.

Wrong.

What I also find most problematic is that it encourages an “oppression Olympics,” where a person who inhabits more traditionally-discriminated-against roles gets to be the ‘be all and end all’ of “right”.  Look, queer, poor, Black women can be wrong too.  But this is not the point.  Oppression is SYSTEMIC, which means we look to systemic inequities to understand how that queer, poor Black woman will likely experience more hardships in life because of discriminatory STRUCTURES that can be IGNORED by White cis men, who are more fit to the system.  No serious, intelligent activist ever used oppression olympics to make their point more legitimate.  No serious, intelligent activist would ever use their own identity as a means to win an argument.  No, queer women of colour MIGHT say, “Look, a point of view you might not be privy to is one that I have experienced  Know that this is a significant point of view that you have failed to appreciate because you are likely to have never had to battle against these institutions  because your privileged position has afforded you the ability to not be aware that there ARE barriers.”

So, next time you get really annoyed with this expression, just appreciate where it comes from and get over yourself a little bit.  There are very few instances when an activist is using it to accuse YOU and, more often than not, it is used to direct your attention to larger systemic issues.

I’d also encourage people to just stop using it- not because it is wrong, but more because it remains an ineffective way to talk about how to do better in this society.

PS: This post also needs to go hand in hand with a misunderstanding of “equality” and “equity”.  This remains a massive problem, especially with Libertarians.  I guess I’ll write about that sometime soon.

I also need to write a post on the problem with political correctness…

These will come- save any vitriol until after those posts.

11 responses to ““Check your privilege” meme and why it is ineffective

  1. I’m about as likely to check my privilege as I’m likely to end up bringing a pork chop to a bar mitzvah. It’s a thoroughly specious phrase, seemingly used to shout people down, rather than engage in reasoned, enlightened debate. Thanks for writing this!

  2. No group is spews as much hateful racism as academics, feminists and the LGTG community. These groups expect the majority to bend to the whim of their minority and are the poster child of the most extreme form of intolerance. Since you say you identify with at least two of the groups, maybe you really should check your privilege?

  3. Pingback: Why @Suey_park won’t “enact the labour”: Women of Colour don’t owe you an education | Melissa Fong·

  4. Thanks for your thoughts! I’m an Hispanic female who was recently told to “check my privilege” by a white, male acquaintance. I was just SEETHING anger until I read your post and thought about how maybe he meant it in the way you described, and not in the “you’re inherently an asshole because of your socio-economic status,” and that I really can’t just pull the “Hispanic woman” card to win arguments about privilege. That said, I totally agree that this phrase is useless, as it tends to incite more miscommunication/anger than actual understanding.

  5. This post is really interesting and it’s good to hear this point-of-view from someone whose work literally involves getting people to check their privilege.

    I feel like the memeification of legitimate social justice concepts is sort of inevitable in online spaces, especially thanks to the rise of Twitter and Tumblr, which facilitate pithy punchy exchanges, visuals, humour and viral sharing, but don’t really leave much room for nuance. And don’t get me wrong, I think this type of social media is important, I think it’s helped a lot of important ideas reach a much wider audience and hell knows, occasionally I really need to see a snarky ecard making fun of patriarchy or I would curl up in a ball and cry. But it does mean that useful frameworks for approaching dialogue are transformed into hard-and-fast “rules” that get deployed in a knee-jerk 140 characters and completely shutdown the possibility of productive interaction. “Check your privilege” is a big one. Also tone-policing, which I think is a great concept in principle, but in online spaces it seems to have evolved from: “Your interlocutor probably has legitimate reasons to feel angry, so focus on the argument, not the tone” into “You may never ever question the validity of someone screaming at you and telling you to go kill yourself.” Similar situation with “shaming” and “erasing”. These things become rhetorical hammer for bashing an opponent as opposed to windows into someone else’s point-of-view.

    Then again, changing minds is not necessarily the goal of every single interaction, we are bound pretty effectively by the limits of the platforms we use and there is not always room for nuance. If someone wants to deploy CHECK YOUR PRIVILEGE meme at a clueless dudebro who has just popped up in their mentions when they are already having a bad day, because snark and rage is more cathartic than trying to do Privilege 101 with someone who doesn’t want to hear it anyway… well, I definitely don’t judge anyone for that! Catchphrases are a double-edged sword. On the one hand, they can help complicated ideas spread very quickly, on the other they can strip the concept of all meaning unless there are people who are willing to educate. So in conclusion, thank you for this, sorry for the monster comment!

  6. Reblogged this on Part Time Monster and commented:
    A good line of thinking on why the “check your privilege” meme and statement are ineffective ways of communicating about privilege. Personally, I think memes like this are preposterous plays in an argument if what you want is to effectively change someone’s mind. Rhetoric is an important way of getting someone to reconsider what they do, and in the heat of an argument, something like this meme will likely only confound its reader if not be seen as an insult. Privilege is complex-it’s about race, gender, class, and socioeconomic status. A change in any of those, or in other ways, can give someone a more or less privileged version of their world to walk in. Reducing that to a meme and a catchphrase isn’t really all that helpful.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s