Okay, I'm picking up what you're putting down. The problem isn't that the government is interfering with private enterprise as you originally stated directly. The actual problem is the government is playing politics with the laws it writes that allow it to interfere with private enterprise.

Please excuse me, sir, but I do have another question for you:

When I asked if you were implying that trademark laws should be eradicated you said

Where did I say that?

You then seemingly changed your reason for opposing this patent office decision from

It is the Government interfering with private enterprise.

to

The Government shouldn't play politics with it

Because of this, I'll assume you aren't entirely against the notion of the government protecting trademarks sought by private entities. In that case, who do you suppose gets to determine when the government is playing politics? Playing politics to one guy is justice to another, after all. Is it like Potter Stewart's definition of pornography, "I know it when I see it?"

There's no need for name calling, by the way. Name calling is for silly people and you clearly aren't a silly person.