all 18 comments

[–]VelvetJusticeBritish Columbia [score hidden]

Unless they're promoting their own blog, or spamming the same article/comment in multiple subs, they're not spamming.

If it's relevant to Canada, it's a valid post, regardless of how much you or I may personally agree or disagree with the content.

Let the subscribers of this sub indicate how appropriate the submission is with their upvotes or downvotes. We don't need the mods deciding for us what we should or shouldn't read.

[–]KlugerHans [score hidden]

Sounds reasonable to me.

[–]Beanleaf [score hidden]

im pretty sure it is their own website

[–]Pocahontas_SpacemanBritish Columbia [score hidden]

Let the subscribers of this sub indicate how appropriate the submission is with their upvotes or downvotes. We don't need the mods deciding for us what we should or shouldn't read.

lol. If you modded a real sub (not one with 6 users like /r/warcrimes), you would understand that 'mob rule' is a terrible way to run a sub. People will upvote something with a shiny headline. A mods job is to remove the shit spray painted gold.

[–]VelvetJusticeBritish Columbia [score hidden]

meh. Good mods only remove actual violations instead of removing content because they personally don't agree with it. Really don't care what you think about how "real" my sub is or how I moderate it.

[–]Pocahontas_SpacemanBritish Columbia [score hidden]

Good mods only remove actual violations instead of removing content because they personally don't agree with it

They didn't remove it 'because they dont agree'. That's your straw man. They removed it because it's a biased, shit source being submitted by an obvious ring of people.

And when people like you who have no experience moderating a truly busy sub talk about what 'good mods' should do, it means absolutely nothing. You have no expertise on the subject as to what constitutes a 'good mod' beyond your own biased opinion.

If /r/canada was run by mob rule, as you suggest, it would be absolute shite. Mods exist to prevent that from happening. Your armchair advice means nothing. You have absolutely no idea the amount of shit they have to wade through to give you a front page resembling something worthwhile.

What you're suggesting is basically no moderation, mob rule. If that existed, you would be SCREAMING for active moderation.

Really don't care what you think about how "real" my sub is or how I moderate it.

Well, that's ironic don'tchathink?

[–]VelvetJusticeBritish Columbia [score hidden]

What you're suggesting is basically no moderation, mob rule.

Nah. Just don't remove articles because the mod personally disagrees. That's not mob rule. That's how reddit works.

MOB RULE! MOB RULE! MOB RULE! lol

[–]Pocahontas_SpacemanBritish Columbia [score hidden]

because the mod personally disagrees.

Not what happened. You just repeating this lie doesn't make it true.

That's not mob rule. That's how reddit works.

Clearly you know how reddit works and no one else does. even the mods and Admin. You're a spammer. Go away.

[–]ochen7British Columbia [score hidden]

The real discussion here should be about the fact that the mods tried to pull an /r/technology on us by silently removing a post and then trying to cover it up by stealthily resurrecting it.

It's clear that some mods decided to impose censorship, got caught, and are now trying to retroactively justify their actions.

[–]ochen7British Columbia [score hidden]

Let's look at the alleged cabal of users who have been submitting links from ntfw.ca:

/u/ochen7

/u/salvia_d

/u/kafka_khaos

/u/Kissingerkid

/u/megathong

/u/aliborat

/u/lookka

Out of this /u/lookka fits your bill about having an ancient inactive account. I really don't know how you can say the same about others.

This is a shameful attempt by the mods to deflect attention away from their attempts to pull an /r/technology.

[–]Tarkmenistan [score hidden]

ntfw.ca is not a news site. It's basically a website trying to sell a product, which is a seal of approval that a company is all Canadian. The news type posts from the site are to create a stir.

The site is trying to create demand for a product it wants to sell. Reddit is being used as a mean to do this.

It's basically advertising.

R/Canada shouldn't let it self be continuously used as a advertising medium.

[–]FoodTruckForMayor [score hidden]

let it self be continuously used as a advertising medium

And especially not to advertise hatred toward fellow Canadians based on the ethnic origins of people they employ.

Racial and economic discrimination are things we should work toward eliminating, not promoting. Raising the issues of TFWs could help us to address such concerns, the approach and tone of ntfw.ca does not.

[–]bacondavisCanada [score hidden]

NTFW is bringing out the dirty laundry for everyone to see what is happening to their fellow Canadians.

One simple question for you? If you worked at a job for 25 years and the company decided to go in another direction, meaning that you're offered early retirement, or fired and your position is filled from someone younger and cheaper, wouldn't you be concerned about this? This has happened to many of my co-workers.

Isn't this situation worthy of posting and informing people about their plight!

[–]amnesiajune [score hidden]

This is a discussion about the sub, not about personal politics

[–]amnesiajune [score hidden]

Why don't we do something like what /r/AskScience does? Have people assign their posts a tag - news, politics, blogs (Things like Canoe, Tyee, NTFW, etc.), light-hearted, and miscellaneous. Have links on the sidebar that show just one type of post, and remove links that are tagged with the wrong tag. Also have rules for each type of post - for example, "News" can only come from a list of approved websites, and (if possible) remove downvotes from "Politics".

With regard to that particular website, I'd suggest that the sub make a policy with regard to advertising. Outright advertising should be banned, and with the mix of activism and advertising (Which is what ntfw does), the mods should look for something suspicious (like a couple of accounts constantly posting from that site), and privately ask those posters for proof that they aren't related to the site - if they refuse or can't show the proof, we should ban those accounts (and possibly the websites) from the sub for violating the advertising rules.

[–]EckhartsLadder [score hidden]

Honestly, I think most subreddits can do with a touch more moderation, including this one. I think bans for those who appear to be gaming the subreddit would not be out of line.

I also appreciate the preamble, I just don't see voting patterns ever changing.

[–]Rockchurch [score hidden]

Is it possible to recruit some extra moderators? Doesn't have to be on a permanent basis. We could look outside /r/Canada if there aren't any qualified people on here willing to help.

[–]Pocahontas_SpacemanBritish Columbia [score hidden]

You shouldnt have to justify removing spam, especially when it's being submitted by a small circle of people. ntfw.ca is a bullshit spam website, not different than if rogers or wal mart was spamming. No 'discussion' needed, it's basic rules of reddit. Just because the idiots here upvote it because they like the product it's selling doesnt change that.