you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]yogiyogioh 807 ポイント808 ポイント

Not a prank, it was assault.

[–]toastygoats 173 ポイント174 ポイント

[–]LeCrushinator 34 ポイント35 ポイント

1.) What the actual fuck. How fucking stupid does someone have to be?

2.) The editing and music in that video gave me cancer.

[–]tehfly 2 ポイント3 ポイント

That was a very sneaky way to get more traffic to worldstarhiphop.

ಠ_ಠ

[–]toastygoats 0 ポイント1 ポイント

hehehe...

[–]c9Rav9c 2 ポイント3 ポイント

jesus christ those comments

[–]Baby_sloths 1 ポイント2 ポイント

One of the top comments: "hey should do it to all his body so he wouldn't have to be black anymore"... oh dear.

[–]Pinksister 0 ポイント1 ポイント

This one gave me a good lol:

I wish my sister would try this shit with me. I already wanna beat her ass for breaking my PS4.

[–]VenusBlue 0 ポイント1 ポイント

Well that didn't look like much of a challenge at all.

[–]cardevitoraphicticia -1 ポイント0 ポイント

Here's a liveleak mirror, because WorldStarHiphop is the monkey website that oinginally spread this "prank": http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=ad9_1402540889

[–]veertamizhan -3 ポイント-2 ポイント

udarealmvp

[–]Rawtashk 41 ポイント42 ポイント

I believe this is a mirror of the video

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rt9BlibTU_Y

[–]StartSelect 230 ポイント231 ポイント

Fucking right. I know it was her brother but bitch needs to learn a lesson and be charged for this.

[–]drquickthoughts 0 ポイント1 ポイント

She deserves to be burned. I guarantee she'll think twice about her actions after she is shown what a horrible decision that was.

[–]notsoinsaneguy 0 ポイント1 ポイント

I highly doubt she realized the damage she would inflict. While she definitely deserves to be punished, I don't think there's any punishment that would make her "learn a lesson" anymore than the severity of the damage she's already inflicted has.

[–]saysAverysmallman 2 ポイント3 ポイント

Yeah she probably shouldn't go to prison long term, that won't help her. But 300 hours of community service seems appropriate.

[–]reebokpumps 96 ポイント97 ポイント

According to this link, it was actually murder.

http://www.poppinlines.com/brother-dies-after-his-sister-throws-boiling-water-on-him/

Not sure if I trust it though.

[–]xMrCrazyx 149 ポイント150 ポイント

That doesn't really look like a burn that would kill someone. It does seem a little shady of a source.

[–]reebokpumps 105 ポイント106 ポイント

That's what you'd think, but burns are a crazy injury. What seems non-life threatening can cause a range of other issues that can easily kill someone. There is actually a formula called the Baux score that helps determine survivability of a burn based on age and what percent of your body was burned.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baux_score

Based on that, I think he would have lived.

[–]rubberseatbelt 22 ポイント23 ポイント

It says he had got rhabdomyolysis (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rhabdomyolysis) and his internal organs eventually failed (not sure if they are connected).

[–]Drop_ 8 ポイント9 ポイント

That's typically what Rhabdo does. I wouldn't be surprised if systemic burns could cause it. But usually it's a complication from overworking muscles.

[–]Wolfe_BTV 3 ポイント4 ポイント

Apparently severe burns can cause it as well: http://www.medicinenet.com/rhabdomyolysis/article.htm

News to me

[–]aziridine86 3 ポイント4 ポイント

Third-degree burns commonly cause rhabdomyolysis.

I'm not sure how it works exactly but severe burns can cause your muscle tissue to breakdown, and then that releases proteins, purines, electrolytes, etc, into your blood stream which causes damage to your kidneys.

[–]AdmiralBobby 0 ポイント1 ポイント

I got rhabdo recently, from over-working on my first day at the gym. Peeing blood for a day, drinking 1,5L of water/hour and wondering each day, for 5 days, if my kidneys will fail on this day is awful

[–]uhhhhhhhhhyeahdude 2 ポイント3 ポイント

I've only ever heard of Rhabdo in reference to over exerting yourself through exercise, leading to breakdown of the muscles, mostly in connection with Crossfit. How would burning break down muscles? Would the heat reach that deep and cook the flesh? Dunno, sounds suspect, but Im no medical professional.

[–]rubberseatbelt 0 ポイント1 ポイント

Not sure. It said it in the article and I posted the Wikipedia page. A comment further down notes how it could have affected the internal organs (liver and kidneys, I think).

[–]PenguinKenny 40 ポイント41 ポイント

Does that imply that no one under the age of 41 can die from burns?

[–]kkyqqp 349 ポイント350 ポイント

Yes. This is why most European cities have transitioned to toddler-only fire fighting services. Their natural immunity to flame has saved dozens of lives.

[–]reebokpumps 29 ポイント30 ポイント

This means that all burns in children (except 100% TBSA burns) should be considered survivable injuries and actively treated.

Wikipedia backs up your statement.

[–]ProfessorMcHugeBalls 10 ポイント11 ポイント

TBSA = Total body surface area
Had to look it up.

[–]chantistar -1 ポイント0 ポイント

what? i'm so confusedd. if you're joking, nvm.

[–]orzof 0 ポイント1 ポイント

Their own lives. That switch has saved dozens of their own lives. Everyone else involved in the fires is left to fend for themselves.

[–]Beznia 7 ポイント8 ポイント

[–]jertheripper 1 ポイント2 ポイント

No, it implies that if you're under 41 there's always a chance for survival.

[–]Shmeves 0 ポイント1 ポイント

The percentage is a little misinterpreted. From what I recall from EMT class, it's almost a fixed number based on where the burn is located. Like the torso front was 14% (bull shit number) etc. If you have burns in 90% of your body, it might only mean there are burn locations on most of your body, not necessarily 90% of flesh is burned.

[–]TeroTheTerror 0 ポイント1 ポイント

Yep rule of 9s: front torso 18, back torso 18, each arm 9, head 9, each leg 18, genitals 1.

[–]BlazzedTroll 0 ポイント1 ポイント

Not, it implies, that 50% of the people under the age of 31* will die from burns that cover 100% of their body. Still seems a little off but it's obviously just an estimate. Area of the burns would affect it as well. 50% of you body burned around your legs is more survivable than 50% of your body being your face and chest.

[–]btheimpossible 0 ポイント1 ポイント

Well now turning 30 doesn't seem so bad...

[–]daymer 12 ポイント13 ポイント

The thing is, when you are burned you continued to cook long after the skin has cooled even. Clothing especially exacerbates this but there are complications even in removing the clothes-pain and opening a wound. On your torso if you're off an average build the organs are relatively close to the surface of the skin and will almost certainly suffer heat damage. Burns are crazy. In humans and animals a burns severity might not be made known for weeks even with regular superficial exams. Always run cold water over a burn for at least 30 minutes even if it looks fine even if it feels cold you can still be literally cooking on the inside.

[–]Oznog99 4 ポイント5 ポイント

Not "literally" cooking. Once the heat is removed the temp will be normal in moments.

But the breakdown will continue. Damaged cells break down for weeks and the body is flooded with toxins from that process. Infection is likely, too.

[–]chantistar -1 ポイント0 ポイント

cold water? are you sure? not ice cold, right? serious question.

[–]t3yrn 1 ポイント2 ポイント

No. Cool, not cold. Cold water can cause sort of a thermal shock -- not sure the medical terms. Or, hell even the validity, but that's certainly what I've heard and it makes sense.

[–]isprobablyatwork 0 ポイント1 ポイント

Correct. Ice cold water can cause additional damage. Use cool but not uncomfortably cold water.

[–]AmazingIsTired 0 ポイント1 ポイント

What sort of additional damage?

[–]Gastronomicus 1 ポイント2 ポイント

The only way a burn like that would probably kill is if it became severely infected with MRSA or something similar.

[–]FireWalkWithMe_LP 1 ポイント2 ポイント

Considering the video has pictures of him with skin grafts that have already taken hold, I'd also say he lived.

[–]Im_Jewish 0 ポイント1 ポイント

Well you can also say, you might not see what the water did internally.

[–]oooodod 46 ポイント47 ポイント

Rhabdomyolysis is what caused the death. Which makes sense. Apparently the deteriorated muscle fibers got into the blood stream and fucked with this guy's liver and kidneys, causing massive organ failure. It sounds like a plausible way to die, and it's an obscure enough complication that only someone with knowledge of it through the medical profession or first hand experience would know what it is. I mean come on, this site couldn't spell skin graft right but they knew what rhabdomyolysis was. That has to count for something.

Burns cause huge issues and surviving the actual burn itself is only half the battle. Afterwards you've gotta make it through infection, skin ulcers, embolisms, etc. Very easy to die in the hospital from this type of injury.

[–]uhhhhhhhhhyeahdude 2 ポイント3 ポイント

it's an obscure enough complication that only someone with knowledge of it through the medical profession or first hand experience would know what it is

Or someone who does crossfit

http://img.breakingmuscle.com/sites/default/files/imagecache/full_width/images/bydate/20130723/unclerhabdo.jpg

[–]02111983 -1 ポイント0 ポイント

I do not agree with you.

[–]Ceron -2 ポイント-1 ポイント

Jesus, I had a similar thing happen to me a couple of months ago (a little smaller of a burn mind you, but still, boiling water), it was an accident though and I just laughed it off and bandaged it.

[–]DJP0N3 8 ポイント9 ポイント

Burns are very dangerous. It's very easy for a burn, especially one that size, to get infected. You're literally removing the skin from your body.

[–]Blutothebabyseal 1 ポイント2 ポイント

Infection can be a bitch doe. Especially for the uninsured who ignore escalating symptoms.

[–]fucking_snuggle 1 ポイント2 ポイント

I'm picturing yosemite or yellowstone filled to the brim with festering annoying does.

[–]Leshbian 0 ポイント1 ポイント

Can confirm. Am poor, uninsured, and constantly ignoring worsening hereditary kidney problems.

[–]NeedYourKarma 0 ポイント1 ポイント

If you're unlucky enough, a papercut can kill you. Because MRSA is fun!

[–]NorthBlizzard 12 ポイント13 ポイント

Like that one guy that used to make bracelets out of his victims teeth, until the teeth started slowly cutting and infecting him.

[–]thebig35 10 ポイント11 ポイント

First I have heard of this, JUSTICE.

[–]ErraticVole 1 ポイント2 ポイント

Or the mighty Sigurd Eysteinsson who was killed by the decapitated head of his enemy.

[–]VisualBasic 2 ポイント3 ポイント

I guess you could say his victims...

=Removes sunglasses=

...took a bite out of crime.

[–]asian_viking 0 ポイント1 ポイント

"I believe it was rhabdomyolysis that caused it (his death)"

Rhabdomyolysis - Rhabdomyolysis is a common and potentially lethal clinical syndrome that results from acute muscle fiber necrosis with leakage of muscle constituents into blood.

"Out of 475 patients...ARF was present in 218 (46%) patients, and 16 died (3.4%)."

Source: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16267412

[–]Kumdogmillionaire 0 ポイント1 ポイント

Diseases caused by it apparently killed him, not the burns

[–]dman71215 -1 ポイント0 ポイント

Hi! My name is..

[–]gliscameria 0 ポイント1 ポイント

The main problem with burns isn't the ugliness. If there is even a mild burn over a large area or volume you ends up with lots and lots of waste, like say damaged cells, proteins, etc - and this gets dumped into the blood/lymph system and wrecks you, sometimes to death.

You ever get a sunburn and felt kind of fatigued for a while? It's kind of like that, but the amount of damaged tissue is much larger.

[–]Heathenforhire 0 ポイント1 ポイント

I'm skeptical. The initial threat to life from a burn is relative fluid shift from the vasculature to the interstitium causing hypoperfusion and eventual death. For the laymen amongst you, that means that your body's natural inflammatory response to injury draws plasma (the main fluid component of your blood) from your artery/vein system into the injured tissue. The loss of fluid from your artery/vein system means your heart has less to pump around the body and your organs (heart, brain, lungs, kidneys, liver, etc) don't receive the necessary amount of oxygen to stay alive, and once they die, you deteriorate until you die.

This guy survived several weeks according to the video, so he did not die from the initial fluid shift caused by his burns. Additionally, the video shows nicely formed scar tissue from several weeks later.

The secondary concern of burns is that it breaches your body's best defence against infection; your skin. Burns victims are susceptible to infection and must be treated carefully to make sure they don't become septic. Once again, nicely healed scar tissue 'weeks after the initial burn.'

I'd be more inclined to believe that the injuries displayed here were pre-existing, as the level of scar tissue is fairly high and, (I could be wrong) not entirely likely from scalding with hot water. I'd expect that to come from a much hotter and more sustained source of heat. I'll concede that I may be wrong, but that's the way I'm leaning until someone can provide, (more than welcome to by the way), more evidence to the contrary.

I can't see why this person would spontaneously deteriorate and die from his wounds after several weeks. His scars are nicely formed, and so a secondary infection is not likely unless it has occurred through some part of the body not displayed that was more severely burned that we have seen so far.

My current theory: pre-existing injury, they've thrown a pot of cold water on him, he's played up the act of being burned, made up a bullshit story of how she burned him, he died and now she's in juvie. Until I see a credible source to confirm his death and the mechanism by which it happened, I call shenanigans.

[–]wBeeze -1 ポイント0 ポイント

I'm no scientist, but if you dumped a pot of near boiling water out, wouldn't it create a big steam cloud?

I saw no steam in the video.

[–]rramsdell 0 ポイント1 ポイント

The water wasn't boiling any longer because it was removed from the stove. But it's hot enough.

[–]mach-2 -3 ポイント-2 ポイント

Yeah, they would require a more generous dosage of hot water to kill.

[–]Oakenbeam 0 ポイント1 ポイント

Not necessarily, it just depends where it's being thrown. If he were to turn around and she got him in the face, it could have resulted in death.

[–]Ubervaag 20 ポイント21 ポイント

Not a very reliable source. But seriously though, how can someone be so fucking stupid? When you reach the age of 13, you should know that putting your finger in boiling water hurts.

[–]im_so_meta 6 ポイント7 ポイント

She does say, seconds before throwing the water on him, when touching the handle of the pot "it's hot for real"

[–]Jimmerism 16 ポイント17 ポイント

So this website got a picture of a juveniles mugshot? I call bullshit

[–]Sir_Fancy_Pants 2 ポイント3 ポイント

I add my name to the list of yours, calling bullshit.

I think this would be more "credible source heavy" if it was genuine, i suspect the prank is perhaps the fake story, and everyone's reaction to it.

[–]Meth_Useler 4 ポイント5 ポイント

How can anyone be sure it's a mug shot? It's just some girl standing in front of a brick wall.

[–]lmnopqrs11 3 ポイント4 ポイント

cause she's black? duh?

[–]Kagrok 1 ポイント2 ポイント

Yeah I took pictures in front of a wall like this for my school ID photo, seems plausible.

They took the profile shot for emergency instances, like if I were missing or something.

[–]RoccoIsATaco 20 ポイント21 ポイント

It had me at "skin graph".

[–]bretttwarwick 33 ポイント34 ポイント

[–]CehJota 0 ポイント1 ポイント

Risky click of the day.

[–]tankertodd 0 ポイント1 ポイント

This link is three standard deviations from AWESOME

[–]ttubehtnitahwtahw1 -2 ポイント-1 ポイント

Skin Graft*

[–]Gfresh404 14 ポイント15 ポイント

poppin lines.com sounds legit

[–]arcanition[🍰] 3 ポイント4 ポイント

I don't know if I trust it either, it says

I know his family. Didn’t know an actual video existed. He died a couple of weeks ago due to complications from the burns. I believe it was rhabdomyolysis that caused it. His skin healed from the skin graph but his organs were not so lucky! Poor little girl got it tough.

But it doesn't look like those burns required skin grafts (not that I'm a doctor or anything) and from what I have read, rhabdomyolysis isn't caused by burns.

[–]Cllydoscope 5 ポイント6 ポイント

See the texture and different coloration of the skin. It looks like something that would result from receiving skin grafts. Compare it to how the "web" like skin grafts in the google images results look. https://www.google.com/search?q=skin+graft&es_sm=122&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ei=1z6bU43EGa2m8QHei4GQBQ&ved=0CAgQ_AUoAQ&biw=1920&bih=955

[–]Treebranch1 4 ポイント5 ポイント

His scars very clearly show skin grafts. Take a better look.

[–]arcanition[🍰] 0 ポイント1 ポイント

Well I trust you, like I said I'm not a doctor so I don't actually know how skin grafts look.

[–]OP_IS_A_FUCKFACE 0 ポイント1 ポイント

He probably doesn't know what a skin graft looks like.

[–]corduroyblack 1 ポイント2 ポイント

rhabdomyolysis

It can be caused by trauma, surgical procedures and extreme body temperatures.

I'm just guessing, but a major burn can cause that.

[–]OriginalEmanresu 0 ポイント1 ポイント

Rhabdo is not a common complication of burn injuries, but it does happen.

Its possible that inflammation/swelling from the burn, the grafts, or a secondary infection could have stopped blood flow through some muscle group. There could have been heat damage directly from the burn to the muscle, he does look like a thin guy, not much insulation between the skin and musculature. He could also have developed a fever, and developed it that way.

Lots of things can cause rhabdo, just not commonly.

[–]tunafishjoe 8 ポイント9 ポイント

It's fake, don't worry. He was complaining about a sunburn on his instagram account a week ago. Then a couple days ago he's shopping around this video on twitter.

http://www.lipstickalley.com/showthread.php?p=17929249

He got a bad sunburn, then took the opportunity to make this video. Genius!

[–]Danjak 6 ポイント7 ポイント

I'd like to see some independent confirmation from a trusted source. Crazy and incredibly sad story, if it's true.

[–]L4NGOS 1 ポイント2 ポイント

Burns are strange things, they can develop life threatening complications so even though those burns didn't look to bad it's not impossible that he died from them... :/

[–]Silverlight42 0 ポイント1 ポイント

Yes, they are strange... let's say he had burns over 25% of his body (didn't look like THAT much), and he's 20ish, then he was expected to survive.... baux score of 45... only over 140 is it said to be non survivable (LD50).

so, not sure if it works this way but if the LD50 is 140, and he's at 45...

He had a 16.1% chance of death?

[–]NeedYourKarma 0 ポイント1 ポイント

I must know if this is a legit source or not!!!!!

[–]AllegoryESQ 0 ポイント1 ポイント

lol is the source a comment from the internet?

[–]Meth_Useler 0 ポイント1 ポイント

I think this needs to be sent through the strainer to catch the presence of any Jimmy Kimmels

[–]abXcv 0 ポイント1 ポイント

Poor little girl got it tough.

What the fuck?

[–]lakingscrzy 0 ポイント1 ポイント

Poor little girl? SHE MURDERED SOMEBODY

[–]markgray109 0 ポイント1 ポイント

I've seem a fellow chef do this with hot grease. It's an awful burn, but I doubt it would kill you.

[–]TonsterMitties 0 ポイント1 ポイント

The wrong child died!

[–]AsymmetricDizzy 0 ポイント1 ポイント

Wait, what? Why the fuck did the post it online then?

[–]MrCopout 0 ポイント1 ポイント

Oh wow, a Youtube comment is the source and you people are taking it half seriously. How gullible can you be?

[–]Timtankard 0 ポイント1 ポイント

The fuck? Can this possibly be real? I thought, with the cut between the boiling water and her walking outside, it was fake.

[–]ohfail 0 ポイント1 ポイント

No.... If you watch the video, it shows him a few weeks after the incident.

[–]Gastronomicus 0 ポイント1 ポイント

Definitely not if those pictures in the video are of the same person. That extensive healing takes months and many skin grafts, and the article claims he died a few weeks later.

[–]jbtk 0 ポイント1 ポイント

I wouldn't trust it. Looks like the same kind of site that stated Bryan Silva was murdered and that girl that got hit in the head with a shovel died from it, which were both untrue.

[–]heracleides -2 ポイント-1 ポイント

That eat-sleep-fuck face on her. She doesn't even realize they are taking her mug shot. She'll use it as a selfie when she gets out.

[–]Dr_Siouxs 6 ポイント7 ポイント

What are you talking about it was hilarious! I think her next prank is to stab or shoot someone!

[–][deleted]

[deleted]

    [–]MinnesotaDan 3 ポイント4 ポイント

    Depends on the state.

    [–]DilatedSphincter -5 ポイント-4 ポイント

    i love how nobody knows the difference between assault and battery. reddit has some top quality armchair lawyers

    [–]MinnesotaDan 3 ポイント4 ポイント

    Actually it depends on the state so you come off as Shitty armchair lawyer for armchair lawyers.

    [–]DilatedSphincter -1 ポイント0 ポイント

    good thing you cleared that up

    [–]Meth_Useler 6 ポイント7 ポイント

    Then explain the guy in the blue shirt. He was hit in the face, yet doesn't really seem to mind

    [–]drinkit_or_wearit 1 ポイント2 ポイント

    It's true, the guy in the blue shirt was pretty well doused in the face, and only acted shocked, he certainly didn't seem to be in pain.

    [–]dman71215 0 ポイント1 ポイント

    Be careful what you speak...the internet will hear you and respond. SHOT GLASS OF BOILING HOT WATER TO THE FACE CHALLENGE. <- see what the internet just did there. :(

    [–]ForgotMyLastPasscode 0 ポイント1 ポイント

    It looks like he minded to me.

    [–]ExAm 0 ポイント1 ポイント

    A small amount of water would probably cool enough over a few feet's distance flying through the air. I'm no scientist though, so don't quote me on that.

    [–]sterling_mallory 0 ポイント1 ポイント

    Could be shock. This woman took acid to the face and seemingly just walked it off at first.

    [–]chenry123 0 ポイント1 ポイント

    Not as long as you say "just kidding" afterward.

    [–]oneeighth 0 ポイント1 ポイント

    Please forgive my stupidity but the water hit mostly his right side but the scaring is all on the left... I dont get it

    [–]Ksanti 0 ポイント1 ポイント

    Assault is threatening violence, hence assault and battery when the violence is actually carried out.

    [–]Was_banned_before 0 ポイント1 ポイント

    get a sense of humor, idiot

    [–]RonPaul_Was_Right -5 ポイント-4 ポイント

    Battery, not assault.

    Assault: Generally, (1) an act intended to cause an apprehension of harmful or offensive contact, and (2) that causes such apprehension in the victim. Essentially, it is the intention and attempt to carry out an act which instills fear in the victim. Whereas, battery is merely (1) an intended direct or indirect contact (2) that a reasonable person would consider offensive or harmful.

    So, unless he had first turned around and subjectively understood the danger of the water (that it was boiling), there cannot be assault.

    Source: I'm a law student. Also, Assault & Battery.

    [–]wotoan 8 ポイント9 ポイント

    Source: I'm a law student.

    You're not a very good law student if you don't realize this varies significantly by state.

    [–]sammanzhi 7 ポイント8 ポイント

    Or maybe he's just a new law student.

    [–]ramen_feet 0 ポイント1 ポイント

    Heh 1Ls

    [–]TreesPumpkiny 1 ポイント2 ポイント

    I am assuming he read the same thread that I did pointing out the differences of assault and battery

    [–]volatilegx 0 ポイント1 ポイント

    Civil assault and battery are pretty similar from state to state. Source: I'm a licensed attorney.

    [–]wotoan -1 ポイント0 ポイント

    Yes, and some states distinguish between assault and battery and some lump it together.

    [–]RonPaul_Was_Right 1 ポイント2 ポイント

    Oh lawd...

    While the sentencing and punishment certainly vary, the distinction between a Battery being the harmful contact and the Assault being the apprehension of that contact (or attempted contact) does not.

    [–]wotoan -1 ポイント0 ポイント

    Yeah, in English common law.

    [–]henstep15 -2 ポイント-1 ポイント

    Regardless of whether he's right, he's a pedantic douche.

    Source: I'm also a pedantic douche.

    [–]RonPaul_Was_Right 0 ポイント1 ポイント

    Regardless, he's a pedantic douche.

    He's right.

    ped·ant (noun)

    A person who is excessively concerned with minor details and rules or with displaying academic learning.

    [–]MartinSchou 0 ポイント1 ポイント

    Riddle me this.

    Considering that the person holding the camera was told what she was planning and did absolutely fuck all to stop it - including telling her that throwing boiling water on people is a bad fucking idea, can they be charged with accessory or something?