You are not properly doing so yourself. When others pointed out your less than grand behavior in the past you had the opportunity to take ownership of it, apologize, and use it to further the conversation.

Well I'm sorry if I don't accept blind assertions of bad behavior. Where I come from, when you say something, you make sure you can back it up. Furthermore, they use these supposed examples of my "bad behavior" to invalidate or dismiss the original post. This is an intellectually dishonest tactic. Exactly the kind I'm talking about.

Instead you gave in and began pointing out logical flaws and calling people names.

Since when is pointing out logical flaws wrong? And as for name calling, I only call people what they have proven themselves to be by their behavior. When someone consistently refuses to abide by the rules of logic, is that not in essence, trolling?

Debate etiquette is not about calling people out and publicly shaming them. It is about being the better man and not going down to that level.

It's called Gresham's Law. Bad debate forces out good, because good debate is harder work. Without a community standard of debate, it will naturally sink to the lowest level, which is what we see now.