you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]RU_Crazy -36 ポイント-35 ポイント

Are they controlling the conversation or just adding to it? Why are you so threatened by someone challenging your world view?

[–]dolphinitelyyy[S] 20 ポイント21 ポイント

Opposing views, bring 'em on. When they're meant to be productive, and are expressed in an appropriate manner and in the appropriate threads. It's not like any of the men I'm talking about are creating their OWN threads and inviting discussion. Nope, they're invading TOTALLY unrelated threads and basically saying, "x can't matter until y does and i want to talk about y and if you won't talk about y with me right now and admit that y is just as bad or worse, then you are rejecting men's rights" That sort of conduct is disruptive. I think it's MEANT to be disruptive.

[–]TheBatarang 11 ポイント12 ポイント

You have a choice when you respond to people to be sympathetic, to show empathy, to show hostility or be dismissive. Circle-jerk and victim bubble are dismissive of the other person and not only is it not very nice it's not helping you get the other person to hear you. People shut off others when they feel attacked or derided. Merely offering a different perspective doesn't make people feel like others are controlling the conversation, it's the addition of hostility and dismissive wording that creates the feeling of being derailed and controlled.

[–]kalichibunny 14 ポイント15 ポイント

There's actually having a conversation, and then there's just trying to rile people up. I'm guessing you wouldn't like it if all of us showed up and butted into your Red Pill conversations.

[–]miss_norway 18 ポイント19 ポイント

You're a Red Pill poster so your views don't count for anything. You're insignificant.