(cache) no radscum • Are you ever going to apologise for saying that lith identities sounded "rapey" to you? While you may not have (and still may not) understand them, that doesn't give you any right to dismiss a legitimate romantic and sexual orientation as being similar to fucking sexual harassment. It's disgusting to me quite frank.

Q:Are you ever going to apologise for saying that lith identities sounded "rapey" to you? While you may not have (and still may not) understand them, that doesn't give you any right to dismiss a legitimate romantic and sexual orientation as being similar to fucking sexual harassment. It's disgusting to me quite frank.

daemutt

theroguefeminist:

spaceorcas:

theroguefeminist:

You are only attracted to people who don’t return your feelings and you don’t see how that’s not problematic?

I also doubt i used the word “rapey” but if I did it was a long time ago and I don’t agree with my use of that word because I think that word is problematic.

But you know fucking what, here i am having a mental break down on my fucking blog and no one gives a shit and i get this bs in my ask box and people asking me to define their fucking identities and solve their problems. I am so sick of this fucking site.

reason why i don’t follow any of the ~popular~ feminist bloggers.

#aro hate #ace hate

how is it aro or ace hate? I know ace people who have issues with the lith identities too

there are issues with consent that you should admit need to be addressed

but you know being sexually attracted only to people who don’t return sexual feelings and entering into romantic relationships with people who may or may not know what you are getting out of the relationship is totally not problematic at all

lithsexuality and lithromanticism are on the aro/ace spectrums…that is why i tagged them as such.

i have no right to judge or call these identities problematic as i am neither lithsexual nor lithromantic. this is a discussion that lithsexual and lithromantic ppl should discuss.