I do prefer my arguments to be based in fact, but I'll address this point.

No wait, what is your point?

You aren't too sharp. It was really, painfully obvious.

Like are you trying to say that if you reversed the genders would I be okay with it? Because no, if men could carry babies, women shouldn't be able to abandon them.

Ah so if and likely when the technology exists to gestate a baby without the mothers consent then it'd be ok to force her to be a parent against her will.

Or are you trying to say that if you could "save" an aborted fetus until birth and then get the mother to pay for it, well that sounds like something Republicans would fund to teach women a lesson or something, but honestly, I have no fucking idea what you mean by this.

Again, its really obvious. And its not about punishing the mother anymore than abortions are about punishing fathers.

This would give men the opportunity to have children regardless of the opinion of the other parent. The same right women have enjoyed since forever. And once the kid is born it doesn't matter who wanted it or didn't, it is owed support by both biological parents.

I don't know what you mean by anything.

That's because you're an idiot. That's not an insult, merely a description of your low intelligence.

It's far too metaphorical to me. The only reason I can see as to why you've suddenly fallen back upon something that doesn't exist is because you have nothing to fall back on that does so yeah.

Doesn't take much to baffle you.

And don't complain about my lack of morally philosophical reasoning, because this argument was never about that, this argument is based in fact and reality and I'd like it to remain that way.

Whereas feminists openly celebrate every step towards artificial sperm as finally freeing women from the shackles of men.