I am smarter than nearly all the girls I’ve ever known.
That’s not arrogance talking: it’s the truth. Out of all the girls I’ve known, maybe three were at least as smart as me, and of that three, one is more intelligent than me. All the rest were my intellectual inferiors. I don’t hold it against them; in fact, when I run across girls who tout their “intelligence,” I feel nauseous, like I’m dealing with a pack of overeager Mormon missionaries.
One of the most dangerous delusions of modern America is the idea that girls are desirable because of how smart they are. Indeed, the idea that intelligent girls even exist in significant numbers is ridiculous. Puffed up by you-go-grrl propaganda from the media, their heads filled with lies from the universities, every girl who can spell her own name suddenly thinks she’s Einstein. Worst of all, girls think that being able to spell their own names entitles them to a good man, even when they’re bossy, defiant and lacking in feminine graces.
This is laughable.
The reality is that truly intelligent females are rare, and most girls who consider themselves “smart” are not. More importantly, the idea that men should find female intelligence attractive is as preposterous as expecting them to find hermaphroditism sexy. A girl’s most important aspects will always be her beauty, her charm and her willingness to please, with intelligence so far down the list that it might as well not be on the list.
Yet thanks to white knights artificially pumping up the egos of every girl in America, men are made to feel like freaks for considering a girl’s bust size to be more important than her ability to regurgitate Marxist tripe.
Here are my reasons why female intelligence is a fraud.
1. Few girls are actually intelligent.
This is the most important thing to know: intelligence is largely a masculine attribute. IQ testing has consistently shown that while men and females have the same mean intelligence, men have a wider standard deviation while females cluster around the middle. In layman’s terms, this means that there are more intelligent men than there are intelligent girls. At the same time, it also means that there are more unintelligent men then unintelligent girls, which is why the short bus tends to be a sausage fest. The “dumb bimbo” stereotype is a fiction invented by ugly girls.
Turns out that “boys go to Jupiter to get more stupider, girls go to college to get more knowledge” was at least half true.
This is why it’s a waste of time for smart men to cast about for a girl who is their intellectual equal: she simply doesn’t exist. You have a better chance of talking Zooey Deschanel and Ellen Page into a threesome than finding a girl who can match you in knowledge, life experience and all-around brains. You do find the occasional woman who can hold her own with men, but these exceptions don’t disprove the rule, any more than the existence of Kim Peek disproves the fact that most autistics are hand-flapping retards.
What’s really awful about this situation is that the mainstream media, invested in hiding the truth, blame men for not being able to find the right girl. “You’re looking in the wrong places.” “Intelligent, classy girls don’t hang out at bars.” “Maybe you just attract the wrong kinds of people.” They can’t simply admit that females are the passive sex, built for raising babies and not much else, because doing so might hurt girls’ self-esteem… and we can’t very well have that, now can we?
2. Girls are intellectually inferior.
Several months ago, I was on Twitter killing time when some teenage girl started sending rude and insulting Tweets at me because she was offfeeennnded at my article on why most girls shouldn’t bother going to college. I initially ignored her, but when she continued to harass me, touting her “4.0 GPA” and how smart she was, I clicked through to her profile and did a little research. Turns out that this oh-so-intelligent young lady was spending $58,000 a year to major in acting. Furthermore, while she was not unattractive—she had a good bone structure, a cute face and huge… tracts of land—she was at least twenty pounds overweight, so several of my followers started calling her fat. What was her response?
She started sending pictures of herself to me in an attempt to prove she wasn’t fat.
This girl wasn’t stupid; she was clearly four or five points above the mean female IQ. But not only did she massively overrate her intelligence, she was unwilling to accept that maybe, just maybe, she had made some poor choices in life.
That is the modern “intelligent” girl; an intellectual vacuum. Her life one great big fraud from beginning to end. Despite her vaunted “smarts” and her belief that she can “do anything,” she doesn’t major in math, engineering, computer programming or any discipline that requires actual work. No, she picks a soft major like English, education or ethnic studies, where there are no standards and you can pass any nonsense in for a grade so long as you sound authoritative. She rationalizes her choices by saying that she wants to “help the children” or she’s “interested in learning,” despite the fact that all American education does is teach people to memorize Marxist nonsense and repeat it back word for word.
Claiming that girls are intelligent because they earn the majority of degrees is like saying that parrots are intelligent because the majority of them can mimic human speech.
When she graduates, assuming she isn’t spat right back into the service industry, she’ll go to work as a government bureaucrat, HR commissar, paralegal or other profession that contributes nothing to society. She’ll complain about the pay gap even as she takes every day off she can because her “head hurts” or she “needs some time off with the girls.” She’ll whine about the lack of girls in management roles even as she plans to quit her job when she has kids… but not until she’s in her thirties, of course.
After all, she wants to “have fun” first and “get it out of [her] system” before she settles down.
But it’s in her choice of hobbies that the modern “smart” girl truly exposes her vacuity. She doesn’t spend her free time reading science textbooks or perfecting her chess game: she TiVoes Teen Mom and obsesses over Lena Dunham’s cleavage. If she reads books at all, she limits herself to trashy mainstream thrillers like The Hunger Games or textual pornography like Twilight. Her weekends are spent pumping chumps for peach daiquiris at the dive bar and getting pumped by every stud who stirs her loins. Even so-called “nerd girls” are phonies, as their “nerdiness” extends to playing video games once in a blue moon or re-Tweeting charlatans like Neil deGrasse Tyson.
The only thing separating her from a ghetto baby momma is the ability to form complete sentences.
Face it: the vast majority of girls are as hollow as a drum. The three or four surplus IQ points that college-educated girls have are wasted on them, because all they’re used for is rationalizing a life of mindless consumption and sluttiness. If the modern West is a cesspool, girls are its most devoted coprophages, gulping down runny diarrhea by the bucketload with forced smiles on their faces.
3. Girls know that their “intelligence” is a lie.
As loudly as they brag about their “strength” and “independence,” girls know inside that their credentials are worthless in the eyes of men. Go back to that chubby acting major who started insulting me on Twitter. Me pointing out that her degree was worthless didn’t faze her, nor did my reminding her that she was wasting sixty grand a year for it. It was calling her fat—insulting her looks—that wounded her most deeply.
And she was so insecure that she resorted to begging for validation from me, a man she considered a “misogynist.”
The vagina is the perfect representation of the nature of females. An empty vessel, a hole, a void with no identity of its own. Without a man to fill her with his essence, she is as useless as a crabapple rotting on the sidewalk. Only by taking that essence deep inside her can she mature and become the woman she was meant to be. And filled with the wrong essence, she becomes an intellectual Typhoid Mary, mindlessly infecting others with her diseases of the mind.
That’s the problem with girls today: they’re so full of bullshit that their eyeballs are brown.
That bullshit is pumped into their skulls by men. Every advance in “women’s rights” occurs only because men allow it to occur. Women’s suffrage was only passed into law in the U.S. because leftist Protestants in the Republican Party wanted to ensure an electoral majority for Prohibition and other “social purity” policies. Sexual liberation only happened in the sixties because cowardly draft-dodging hippies, knowing they could not compete with real men for the affections of feminine women, encouraged girls to slut it up so they could get laid. The mass entry of girls into college and the workforce was instigated by corporate capitalists in order to drive down wages and smash workers’ rights.
If at any point, men had collectively told girls no, they would have quieted down and gone back to the kitchen like they were told.
So it is with the myth of female intelligence. Girls believe they are smart, worldly and cultured because men lie and white knight for them. The gelded father telling his little princess that she can be whatever she wants to be, the slack-wristed orbiter who writes sweet nothings on her Facebook posts, the hipster nancyboy who claims he wants an “equal”: they are the enemy. Without them, the Katerinas of America would gladly kneel to their Petruchios. Because these genetic discards cannot compete with legitimate men, they encourage degeneracy in the vain hope of getting their dicks wet.
Spraying the hollyhocks with lye is the only way they can propagate their diseased seed.
As men, it is our responsibility to bring girls back to their proper place. To lead them into their natural roles as wives and mothers. We men do not choose or reward girls for their clown college degrees, their meaningless cubicle jobs, or their supposed “intelligence.” We reward them for their willingness to please us and make us happy, and in doing so make themselves happy. No amount of phony education or career “success” will scratch that deep itch in a girl’s soul: the desire to serve a man.
Not a “guy,” not a “male”: a man.
Inside every Strong, Independent Woman™ is a suppliant girl yearning to break free. I say we give that girl a hand.
P.S. The revised and expanded edition of Confessions of an Online Hustler drops this Friday. Check back later in the week for more details.
Read Next: The Case Against Female Education
Learn how to start a blog and make money from day one with this short guide. Also receive twice-monthly updates highlighting my best articles as well as news and special offers you won't find anywhere else.
I guarantee 100% privacy. Your information will not be shared.
I don’t understand what a “mean” is.
[CensorBot sez: I know, the maths is hard.]
How dare you censor me. I am a QUEEN and I will NOT be disrespected.
[CensorBot sez: By leaving moronic comments, you are in violation of this site's Terms of Use. Further communication is at your own peril. In other words... LOLOLOLOLOLOL]
Well, this blog is stupid. I didn’t want to comment here anyway.
[CensorBot sez: Your bitterness is showing, baby.]
It’s a hilarious blog, actually, and not a bad way to spend my time as I wait for my vegetables to saute so that I can put a pot roast in the oven for my very sexy man, one who does something valuable with his time. Because that’s what normal housewives do: flirt with strange men on the Internet. Right?
Look, Matt, I love the manosphere. All these… men… around! They just make me giddy like a schoolgirl.
Consider putting some balance in your posts. Have you ever read anything by Athol Kay? I like him because he waters down the truth enough that faux-submissive hausfraus like myself don’t get their feeeeeelings hurt.
Do you really want to upset attention whoring strumpets like myself? That’s not going to get you any pats on the head from me, dear sir.
Go Team Woman!
[CensorBot sez: Revolting siren. Another female entryist who wants to emasculate the manosphere because it doesn't cater to her whims. Get you gone.]
White Knights constantly support women, do their work for them, give them a hand up everywhere, and then claim that women are equal. What a joke.
Matt: I don’t have a strong opinion on Neil DeGrasse Tyson one way or another. I’m curious to know what your beef with him is.
Oh CensorBot, I can’t get enough of this abuse! Ooooh yes, right there, that’s PERFECT…
[CensorBot sez: You bore me, woman. Go crochet a hat or something.]
Steve: Tyson is Carl Sagan in blackface (Sagan was also a fraud, but that’s a story for another time). Tyson has no substantive achievements to his name; the only reason he’s famous is because he can dumb down meaningful scientific concepts into snack-sized little factoids for the idiots to gnaw on. He’s part of the degeneration of science into cutesy pop culture junk food.
SOMEBODY PLEASE PAY ATTENTION TO MEEEEEE!!!!!!!!111
[CensorBot sez: Comment number six. Your life is apparently so empty and meaningless that you have nothing better to do then go to a blog you dislike and get metaphorically micturated on. Reevaluate the choices that led you to this sorry state of affairs.]
The arrogance of university-educated women majoring in soft subjects is part of the problem. I suspect this line of reasoning happens:
1. I’m going to University.
2. University is only for intelligent people.
3. Therefore, I’m intelligent.
…Ignoring the fact that soft majors require very little intelligence, and that Cultural Marxism has polluted fields like Psychology into resembling pop culture babble. Given the degradation of journalism over the last 15 years, I suspect due to the influx of women into the field chasing ‘Sex In The City’ aspiration, I’d suspect that the majority of female-driven university subjects are aimed at those of 110 IQ or less: utterly mediocre thinkers who are incapable of independent thought, parroting back what they’re told for approval, which is why Feminist thinking stagnates and resembles Religion rather than Philosophy or Sociology.
Women, so concerned with Social Approval, make for great parrots, but uncreative thinkers. Their mediocrity makes them interchangeable in the job market, hence $60,000 worth of education to work in the service industry until finding the ‘dream job’ they believe they’re ‘entitled’ to, only to abandon it in their late 30′s when the inevitable baby rabies sea change kicks in.
So you have this mass of women with degrees who believe themselves to be Highly-Intelligent, rather than of Mediocre intelligence, which makes them dangerous due to their arrogance: they can’t conceptualise of Higher Thought than their own. I sit exactly on the +3 Standard Deviation, and am very humble when confronted by the possibility of higher intelligence than my own. Arrogant woman are incapable of that, unaware that, as intelligence increases, complexity of thought, particularly logical and abstract thought, vastly changes the way people think, and, as such, what strikes their 110 mindset as a perfectly-rational, bulletproof argument, reads as retarded thinking to someone like me, at 145.
A 30 IQ point difference is all it takes for a higher intelligence to see mental retardation in the lower, and the lower to be incapable of the thought processes required to read anything other than insanity in the higher. It’s called the Communication Gulf. I stay humble by recognising that it’s entirely possible that my rational thought appears retarded to a more intelligent man than me. Arrogant, mediocre women are incapable of this, so respond with the kind of ill-informed drivel you get from your critics, not capable of even considering the possibility it might read like retarded drivel to other people, which I suppose spares them the social embarrassment of realising just how ridiculous their behaviour is.
If I want True Communication with a woman, she has to be within 15 IQ points of me. With the lower mean IQ of female intelligence, and so few extreme outliers, that means I can only truly-communicate with something like 0.6% of women. This is like holding out for a magical unicorn. Therefore, I can either try to seek out intelligent women, with the result of dating women who consider themselves intelligent but are simply mediocre, retarded thinkers and unpleasant company due to their arrogance and vanity, or I can just fuck beautiful, stupid women who are pleasant company. Women who I never reveal my intelligence to, because, despite women saying they want ‘intelligent’ men – actually meaning rich and powerful men they can extract resources from or use to increase their social-standing – they’re quite happy to fuck dumb, muscular men on the road to the guy they believe they ‘deserve’, because fuck knows they wouldn’t offer Mr. RIght the respect of sexual-propriety in the meantime.
Give an intelligent woman the appearance of a stereotype – in my case, the muscular blue collar biker – and she will never remotely-question that she’s responding to performance, not actuality, because mediocre thinkers believe in polarised-extremes and either / or propositions, particularly those that excuse them from personal effort: a bodybuilder must ‘be dumb’ and ‘compensating for something’; a fat woman must have a ‘nice personality’.
Given the rise of Female Narcissism, where men are thought of as little more than actors in their play, devoid of their own agency and desires, giving off the appearance of an uncomplicated stereotype will you get far more pussy than mentally-challenging them.
This article resonates deeply with me. You’ve hit the nail right on the head. The more emotional a woman is in the moment, the less sense you need to make. Nowadays, in conversations, I may decide to just claim some fucking nonsense and they still honestly think it’s a conversation. It amazes me. They couldn’t objectively view the logical patterns in a conversation if their life depended on it. PS. I enjoy your articles thoroughly.
Reading this article was strange.
It was a mix of facts, valid arguments, invalid arguments, outright falsehoods, and things that appeared to be said out of nothing but bitter anger.
Some of it was quite valid; the part about the IQ scores matched what my own research has led me to believe. The implications of that, as described, were valid, as far as they went. Camille Paglia said much the same in a recent article.
Section 2 stretched the point a little far. The language was obviously supposed to be provocative, and the fact that genuinely intelligent women do exist was acknowledged. The vapidness of modern women has less to do with _women_, as far as I see it, as it does to do with the trajectory of Western culture at this moment, however (especially the politically correct movement).
Section 3 stayed closer to the facts, except for this bit:
“The mass entry of girls into college and the workforce was instigated by corporate capitalists in order to drive down wages and smash workers’ rights.”
This is of course not true, and the latter half of the sentence is explicitly Marxist. The linked article does not support this interpretation of events, either (yes, I did read it; the article described it as largely the aftereffects of the war and the cultural changes wrought by having so many women entering into previously male-dominated professions). Worker’s rights, per se, do not exist; rights are had by individuals qua individuals, not groups, and rights are the same across the board. It may well have interfered marginally with union bargaining and political power momentarily, but unions did not and by and large never have served much in the long-term interest of the average employee anyway – at least not to the extent that he held to any moral code at all.
The rest of the article was largely the same mixed bag.
Its very interesting to read something written by someone who is clearly so angry at the subject matter at hand, and yet is not so far gone as to take leave of his senses entirely. Usually someone like that runs out of facts and valid arguments at the beginning of an article, and by the end has long since degenerated into ranting.
+1. Go Forney.
I wanna make love to you.
[CensorBot sez: Get in line.]
I mostly agree, but I think the context of intelligence needs to be addressed.
I went to a graduate professional (medical) school. Most of my classmates were female. There were definitely some smart women in our class, and several got over a 3.7, which is an impressive GPA for a medical program. Hardly any of them did poorly. However—-the highest (and lowest) scoring students in class were men. One guy had the highest GPA ever recorded in the program, and another had a PERFECT board score, which is almost unheard of. I had an average GPA but was in the top 3 for class board scores. So It got me thinking about what female intelligence actually is.
Women have been shown to have higher average inter-hemisphere connectivity than men. Women also have higher verbal reasoning scores, and some disorders such as dyslexia have ten times the incidence in males as in females. In other words, cognitive function is Y-linked on many levels.
My theory is that while women tend to excel memorizing and regurgitating information and following a protocol, they do not excel at critical thinking, abstract concepts, and dynamic problem-solving. Women’s social and linguistic brains are primed for academia, but when it’s time put put the hammer to nail and axe to the grindstone, they are utterly inferior at inventiveness, implementation, and critical decision-making. Hence why most of the great scientific and cultural discoveries and advents of modern times are attributable to men. Furthermore, it is not because women were “oppressed” for so long, otherwise we would be seeing a surge of female contributions to science, medicine, and technology over the last 50 years. We aren’t, and we are still waiting.
Women think that because they can join the “boy’s club” that they are suddenly our intellectual equals. Academic statistics and female college enrollment numbers are not helping either. The female brain is inherently well-suited for academia, but beyond taking tests and taking notes, they tend to fall woefully short in areas of rationality that make a truly intelligent individual: introspection, objectivity, decisiveness, and a working knowledge of logical fallacies. And as always, the proof is in the pudding. Where are the contributions? Where are the great female leaders, inventors, producers, and industry pioneers. Few and far between.
The social glorification of the feminine imperative has only made matters worse, and now their big girl panties are so inflated that they cannot realize or accept that men are the drivers of civilization and everything they take pride in today was made possible by men.
If women were truly more intelligent than men they would all be voting in a completely different manner than they actually do. If you are smart, then you don’t need a massive cradle to grave welfare state to take care of you. Women in general vote left. Married white females are probably the most intelligent because they are least likely to vote for that. The 80 IQ black inner city high school dropout single mom is the polar opposite. Single white females are the swing vote in the middle that will probably decide the future of this country. From the single white females I personally know, that thought is a little bit scary but let’s hope that they take a more long term view instead of indulging in short term selfishness.
Matt,
Have you ever wondered if this arrogance is just a facade? Praising a kid for their raw IQ leads to sad consequences for some (or I dunno, maybe even most) of those kids. They learn that intelligence is a part of their identity, and their ego depends on it. Then, when school gets tough (usually around college time), those kids don’t learn as effortlessly as before, and it feels like they are not as intelligent as they were told. This realization would break their ego if it happened. To avoid it, they only engage in easy tasks, to maintain the feeling of effortless learning. And they end up stupider and less educated than kids who were praised for effort, and not for raw IQ.
If I was a sadist and wanted to create a generation of insecure, ego-protecting kids with badly developed minds, I’d praise them all for IQ early and as often as possible, and tell them college should be super easy for them and they can just breeze through it.
Unfortunately the article is spot on. I’ve had the pleasure of meeting a few HI IQ women (130+ on the older harder tests) with actual abilities in Maths and science and problem solving and there are even a few public figures such as Dannica McKellar (who is at least quite good at Maths), Marilyn Vos Savant and the terrific Dr. Helen
The bulk of them? No and hell no.
That said today’s vapid chicks are a product of easy living. Pioneer women for example probably had much better problem solving skills even though they brain didn’t start with any more brain cells.
I worked for 31 years in a high tech factory as an electronics technician. We had around 300 male technicians and maybe 20 females. The difference between techs was the ability to troubleshoot. (i.e. – diagnose problems.) Like anyone could run ordinary tests…
We had what we called ‘super techs’. That is, men who could be relied on to find and solve the most difficult problems. Note that I said ‘men’ because while the women were good workers and stuck to it. Very seldom would you call in a woman to help solve a really hard problem.
And, as I hope everyone clearly understands, most men were also not super-techs. And, we had some real dummies. We had one man so dumb he ran tests on military light bulbs. Better him than a smart man…
As best as I could estimate by self-reporting the average male i.q. was around 135, probably not far from that for women. But, we had a couple men over 180, no women.
I really need a kick in the balls.
[CensorBot sez: Impossible. You have no balls.]
What also needs to be adressed is the fact that modern tests are specifically made to accommodate women. If a test leads to divergent means between men and women, it’s considered “biased” because OF COURSE men and women are equal.
Matt, you should know you are smart when the best engineer and inventor known to history shares similar beliefs with yours.
http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/Nikola_Tesla#Quotes_on_Feminism
What passes for smart amongst women is being verbose in applying all the useless, relativist postmodern horseshit they learned in school in arguments ultimately intended to rationalize their emotions
Agree with most of what you say – however there is a good genetic reason for a man to have children with a woman who has at least something upstairs: boys inherit much of their intelligence from their mother (or more technically, their mother’s father). An intelligent man and a stupid woman have a chance to give birth to an intelligent girl. But a stupid woman will almost always have a stupid son regardless of the father.
it is a bad idea to find an intelligent woman because they don’t exist. Simple as that. Women’s brains are smaller and they waste what little IQ they have on silly things like celebrity gossip.
So the basic premise of this article is totally right. (that there’s a choice between boobs and IQ)
[CensorBot sez: Yup.]
I would like to make love to this man.
[CensorBot sez: Send nudes to therealmattforney [at] gmail [dot] com.]