Cameron would agree to safe passage out of Syria for Assad

Britain would back 'anything to get that man out of the country', says prime minister on visit to Saudi Arabia

  • guardian.co.uk,
  • Jump to comments ()
Cameron visit to the Gulf States
Government ministers welcome David Cameron in Abu Dhabi, ahead of his visit to Saudi Arabia. Photograph: Stefan Rousseau/PA

Britain would be prepared to allow Syria's president, Bashar al-Assad, to be given safe passage to a third country, it has emerged, as fears rise that a prolonged conflict will fuel extremism.

In remarks released as David Cameron arrived in Saudi Arabia – a country that is a strong supporter of the Syrian opposition – the prime minister said he would agree to "anything" to see Assad removed from power.

Britain is usually wary of allowing leaders accused of war crimes to be granted a safe haven on the grounds that they should face international justice. But Cameron, who indicated that Britain would not facilitate Assad's passage out of Syria, said he was determined to see Assad removed. There are fears that extremism will flourish if the conflict continues.

Asked on al-Arabiya television what he would say if Assad demanded safe passage, the prime minister said: "Done. Anything, anything to get that man out of the country and to have a safe transition in Syria.

"Of course, I would favour him facing the full force of international law and justice for what he's done. I am certainly not offering him an exit plan to Britain but if wants to leave, he could leave, that could be arranged."

The Syrian conflict was expected to dominate the agenda on Tuesday when Cameron meets King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia in Jeddah. The Saudis have been leading supporters of the rebels seeking to overthrow Assad.

The prime minister, who spoke of "appalling slaughter" in Syria, reached out to his Saudi hosts by saying Britain was keen to support the opposition. For the moment this will stop short of offering arms.

Cameron said: "We must ask ourselves what more can we do? How can we help the opposition? How can we put the pressure on Assad? How can we work with partners in the region to turn this around?"

Asked whether Britain would help arm the rebels, he said: "We are not currently planning to do that. We are a government under international law and we obey the law.

"My fear is, firstly, that the slaughter will continue, that the loss of life will continue. That should be our number one concern."

The prime minister said extremism could flourish if the conflict were allowed to continue. He said: "There is another fear, which is that the longer this goes on, the more that it can promote and drive extremism and we'll see instability in the region as well."

Cameron, who will discuss Saudi Arabia's fears about the Iranian nuclear programme, will use the visit to press the king to place a second order for the Eurofighter Typhoon jets. Saudi Arabia has already acquired 72 of the aircraft.

Britain is hoping to secure sales of an extra 100 Eurofighters across the Gulf. This would be worth £6bn to British firms.

At the end of Cameron's visit to the United Arab Emirates, a joint communique issued by the two countries said that the UAE and Britain planned to establish a defence and industrial partnership involving close co-operation around the Typhoon.

The statement said the defence alliance would also collaborate on "a number of new technologies", but did not elaborate.

Cameron promoted the Typhoon to Emirati ministers during his visit and his office and BAE officials have said the Emiratis have shown interest in ordering up to 60 of the aircraft. The two countries have also been discussing how to develop a "strategic air defence relationship".

Tuesday's communique said the UAE and Britain would increase their joint military exercises and training. It pledged easier travel between the two countries, but gave no details.

Cameron made an unapologetic defence of his three-day trip to the Gulf amid criticism from Amnesty International of a "deeply disturbing tradeoff" between trade and the promotion of rights. He said: "When it comes to Saudi Arabia … this is a country that's very important for our prosperity but it's also important for our security too. As a full G20 member, we'll both be discussing Syria, Iran, other regional issues that are vital to the future security of the United Kingdom."

Downing Street is likely to point out that François Hollande, the French president, made an identical trip to Jeddah two days ago. France aggressively promotes its arms trade.

Comments

181 comments, displaying first

  • This symbol indicates that that person is The Guardian's staffStaff
  • This symbol indicates that that person is a contributorContributor
Open for comments. or create your Guardian account to join the discussion.
Welcome {name}, you're signed into The Guardian using Facebook. Join the discussion.
  • PaulLambert

    6 November 2012 1:12PM

    He's basically standing in McDonalds, enjoying a greasy Big Mac, while lecturing the world about the evils of junk food.

  • retrorik

    6 November 2012 1:15PM

    And soon to clinch a deal for more weapons of destruction so that another regime can intimidate it's own people.

  • ClericPreston

    6 November 2012 1:21PM

    You couldn't make this up.....


    Which unfortunately can't be said of Cameron, since he seems to make up party and UK policy as he goes along.

  • peterNW1

    6 November 2012 1:23PM

    the prime minister said he would agree to "anything" to see Assad removed from power.

    "Anything" would of course include an Islamist government and sharia law in Syria.

    Christians make up circa 20% of the Syrian population. As in Iraq, their freedom was until recently guaranteed by a secular Ba'athist government. Now, thanks to Obama, Clinton and Haig, the Islamists are soon to take over. Cameron is yet another western fathead happy to let minorities go to hell as long as he gets his Saudi oil and arms contracts.

  • GeorgeWBushAteMyCat

    6 November 2012 1:26PM

    Hypocracy of the highest order... surely Assange's (alleged) crimes pale into insignificance compared to Assad's well-documentated atrocities? David Cameron should be publicly flogged at noon each Friday as a lesson to the rest of his ilk!

  • Mrstreetwise

    6 November 2012 1:28PM

    SAFE PASAGE......?

    Does anyone remember that guy... whats his name....? ahhh TONY BALIR, nearly forgot him if it wasn’t for all the blood on his hands.

    The audacity to have murderers roaming around the world giving lectures, earning millions who have MURDERED MILLIONS OF INNOCENT MEN, WOMAN & CHILDREN and then say we can do the same for you!!!!!!! ASTONISHING!!!

    Well done Mr PM you are really living up to your predecessors.

    SHAMELESS

  • Hejz

    6 November 2012 1:28PM

    does safe passage gives assad immunity
    will assad still be subject to int law/justice whatever?
    forget about int law/justice forget about the dead - just get him out of there.. (its like DC is above the law or any country that gives safe passage, that's like the same as aiding the enemy, ("bradly mannig charge for aiding the enemy")...

  • 3genders

    6 November 2012 1:32PM

    Downing Street is likely to point out that François Hollande, the French president, made an identical trip to Jeddah two days ago. France aggressively promotes its arms trade.

    ...on the other hand, if sir doesn't wish to purchase any weapons of mass destruction we do a most appetising home-made range of Jeddah Cheese...

  • Nivedita

    6 November 2012 1:34PM

    In remarks released as he arrived in Saudi Arabia – a country which is a strong supporter of the Syrian opposition –

    Saudiarabia, a backward, sharia wielding, misogynist, torture friendly, oppressive, absolute monarchy has got a nice image makeover in Guardian as a ' a country which is a strong supporter of the Syrian opposition'.
    The power of petrodollars......

  • DeimosP

    6 November 2012 1:39PM

    My understanding of the situation is that it is the problems relate to "the regime" and that the departure of one individual, even from the top) will not actually resolve much because "the regime" is still there. I believe these situations need real solutions rather that PR statements designed to sound good to everybody but with no proposals to resolve the issues. Do Cameron really think that as soon as Assad departs Syria that opposing sides will be kissing and making-up and live in peace from then on ? Naiveté helps nobody.

  • Grattan

    6 November 2012 1:41PM

    The elite meets the elite. Cameron tells the Saudis go on persecuting your Shias we don't mind. At the same time he wants to remove a secular regime from a developing country and replace it with a rag bag of Islamist fundamentalists, foreign thugs and a Sunni elite on a promise from the Gulf states. What will Cameron do for the Christians, Shias, Jews and other notorious unbelievers who were left behind to face Sunni fanaticism? Sweet Frances Adam. It's disgusting that we had anything to do with these nasty hijacking, beheading Onanists.

  • owBLD

    6 November 2012 1:46PM

    This comment was removed by a moderator because it didn't abide by our community standards. Replies may also be deleted. For more detail see our FAQs.

  • flanintheface

    6 November 2012 1:48PM

    Reminds me Eddie Izzard talking about mass murderers:

    You know, we think if somebody kills someone, that's murder, you go to prison. You kill 10 people, you go to Texas, they hit you with a brick, that's what they do. 20 people, you go to a hospital, they look through a small window at you forever. And over that, we can't deal with it, you know? Someone's killed 100,000 people. We're almost going, "Well done! You killed 100,000 people? You must get up very early in the morning. I can't even get down the gym! Your diary must look odd: “Get up in the morning, death, death, death, death, death, death, death – lunch- death, death, death -afternoon tea - death, death, death - quick shower…"

  • plexply

    6 November 2012 1:49PM

    The arrogance of such statements seems lost on mainstream media journos. Which sums up their own view.

  • arbitrarynight

    6 November 2012 1:49PM

    > We are a government under international law and we obey the law.

    Really? Was it all crap about denying the ECHR?

  • redpersonmacpherson

    6 November 2012 1:49PM

    Dave just can't stop himself being the all-things-to-all-men blabbermouth marketing man, can he? He's in one of the most politically sensitive regions of the world, where using phrases such as 'I'd do anything' is just going to make him seem a bit of a bumpkin. Who does he think he's talking to? Embarrassing.

  • giordanoBruno

    6 November 2012 1:53PM

    Britain would be prepared to allow Syria's president, Bashar al-Assad, to be given safe passage to a third country, it has emerged, as fears rise that a prolonged conflict will fuel extremism.

    This is a tacit acknowledgement by the British Imperialists that they have failed in dislodging Assad with their satraps.

  • BlankReg

    6 November 2012 1:53PM

    He'd probably give the Assads sanctuary as well, like Thatcher did for Pinochet.
    The Tory party: the dictator's friend.

  • SwordShadow

    6 November 2012 1:56PM

    So Cameron is meeting with the bloated tyrant of a state where women are property, "sorcerers" are beheaded and which funds an ideology of hatred globally?

  • bailliegillies

    6 November 2012 2:01PM

    Too late as it won't make the slightest bit of difference because it's a civil war with ethnic and religious overtones. Assad is just part of the problem, the real problem being the third parties who are supplying the guns and mercenaries, who once Assad is gone will want to ethnically cleanse the country of Allawites, christians and Shias and impose their own brand on the country whether they want it or not. The west and Cameron in particular will have no say in the outcome as even the Americans are beginning to accept that it is spinning out of their control and is likely to become another Iraq or Libya.

  • gurupitka

    6 November 2012 2:06PM

    Hey Camoron why don't you stay with Assad in Syria and don't come back. Your missus and his missus will get on just fine.....and one more thing don't come back!

  • ThomasPaine2

    6 November 2012 2:13PM

    I nearly choked on my coffee when I read that Cameron has stated that Iran getting WMDs would start an arms race in the Middle East which would be a disaster. I'm sure what he meant to say was that Britain should be the one that starts an arms race in the middle east and just to prove it, here we are selling weapons to those friends of democracy, the Saudis. You couldn't make it up.

  • andyljus

    6 November 2012 2:15PM

    He could stay at my flat with his tasty wife, haha!
    Bloody ridiculous what our leaders are getting up to these days!

  • Ikonoclast

    6 November 2012 2:16PM

    How about allowing the referendum to take place, and allow Assad to modernise by way of the introduction of circa 9 political parties? Nope that won't do, not in an energy barren country such as the UK. Syria can't have democracy as the US, UK and NATO need it to be a client state, completely in chaos (think Libya) with an equally corrupt bunch of thugs (think Libya)..

  • jalfreziboy

    6 November 2012 2:18PM

    Cameron would sell his Grandmother if HE benefited from it. A wanker with power, prowling the world stage and I utterly detest the bastard.

  • Parry1

    6 November 2012 2:21PM

    "safe passage out of Syria for Assad" - surely we have got this up-side-down.

    Safe passage for all Syrian who are victims of Assad's killing machine!

  • herogram

    6 November 2012 2:38PM

    We are a government under international law and we obey the law

    Hmm. I should lend him my copy of the Big Girl's Bumper Book of International Justice. I'd even bookmark a couple of the relevant chapters.

  • 78comments

    6 November 2012 2:38PM

    "Britain would be prepared to allow Syria's president, Bashar al-Assad, to be given safe passage"

    Why? Does Britian own the middle east now? Or has the colonial menatility not gone yet?

  • Condems

    6 November 2012 2:39PM

    Just wondering - should we not be makin an effort to join forces with lesser evils in order to help handle what is a dire situation? As horrible a kingdom Saudi may be, people there arn't dying at the rate of the Syrians. If the rebels were to join forces with those other rebels they don't really approve of maybe Assad could be finished by now. Maybe then other problems could be addressed (like the lesser tyrant regimes). Just a thought

  • 78comments

    6 November 2012 2:39PM

    "Britain would be prepared to allow Syria's president, Bashar al-Assad, to be given safe passage to a third country, it has emerged, as fears rise that a prolonged conflict will fuel extremism"

    Fuel extremism you mean like Mitt Romney in the US being the Chiristian extremist? Are we going to send funds for a revolution to the american militias too if he gets into the white house?

  • 78comments

    6 November 2012 2:41PM

    If you want peace in the region - stop all arms supplies to it. No weapons no explosions and no killings. Simply really.

    Impose all the sanctions on the arms dealers benefiting from this civil war.

Open for comments. or create your Guardian account to join the discussion.
Welcome {name}, you're signed into The Guardian using Facebook. Join the discussion.

Today's best video

Guardian Bookshop

This week's bestsellers

  1. 1.  Colouring for Grown-ups

    by Ryan Hunter £4.79

  2. 2.  Dogma & Disarray By Polly Toynbee

    £5.00

  3. 3.  House of Fun

    by Simon Hoggart £9.99

  4. 4.  Mrs. Weber's Omnibus

    by Posy Simmonds £15.50

  5. 5.  I am the Secret Footballer

    £7.99