| Anime >> Raw Anime | Flag torrent |
| Name: | [Raws] Dog Days` - 02 (MX 1280x720 x264 AAC).mp4 | Date: | Jul 14 2012, 16:46 GMT |
| Submitter: | kl9710 | Seeders: | 323 |
| Tracker: | http://open.nyaatorrents.info:6544/announce | Leechers: | 34 |
| Information: | Downloads: | 3295 | |
| Stardom: | 0 fans. | File size: | 199.5 MiB |
Vuze (classic UI and Mainline DHT plugin) is the recommended client.
Playback help is here, and you probably need it.
Torrent description:
None
Files in torrent:
Show filesUser comments:
No user comments have been posted.Post a comment:
You need to be logged in to post a comment.| You need to be logged in to use the chatbox. |
| [15/7 03:35 GMT] <Krudda> um, I doubt you'll be "right back" lol, how big is your "library". If I were to re-encode my archives... I'd be here for at least 2 or 3 months straight |
| [15/7 03:17 GMT] <dilworks> I'm bored about patents BS. Gonna reencode my library to Cinepak just for lulz, brb :P |
| [15/7 03:13 GMT] <Krudda> @Ocelot999: This chat works like a forum, post message, refresh to see new messages. If you just sit here awaiting a reply... you're going to be sitting there a while |
| [15/7 03:11 GMT] <Krudda> Doesn't work unless you patent it before I use the idea... So until you patent it, I can do whatever I like with it, and you can't just patent the idea... it doesn't work like that, you gotta make it an actual product. (Which I'm not buying...) |
| [15/7 02:56 GMT] <Ocelot999> Anybody Here? |
| [15/7 02:36 GMT] <dilworks> I'm still going to patent it, and then sue you for over 9000$ :D |
| [15/7 02:14 GMT] <Krudda> Exactly why I mentioned it 0:) |
| [15/7 02:03 GMT] <OnDeed> but seriously, as pirates and/or leechers, we are hardly impartial enough to be in position to criticise copyright law. |
| [15/7 02:02 GMT] <OnDeed> [dilworks just gained a level in webihipster: +1 patent law +1 pirate party] |
| [15/7 01:56 GMT] <dilworks> I think that some YouTube Poop(TM) should hold Prior Art on that... but then remember: the U.S. patent/copyright system is FUBAR. |
| [15/7 01:41 GMT] <Krudda> well, according to U.S. law, ()blivion holds the copyright (Or someone he knows does anyway), so there may be some problems there |
| [15/7 00:53 GMT] <dilworks> GOTTA PATENT IT!!! |
| [15/7 00:53 GMT] <dilworks> I'm pretty convinced that there is future for those toothpaste Oreos... at least I know a few mothers that will love them ;) |
| [15/7 00:49 GMT] <Krudda> mmm. maybe it was Oreo flavored toothpaste. The new sensation from Colgate (Popular Toothpaste brand in my country) |
| [15/7 00:47 GMT] <Krudda> was it triple mint or plain mint or spearmint or... *goes on* |
| [15/7 00:29 GMT] <dilworks> Mmmm.... tasty fresh mint :) |
| [15/7 00:22 GMT] <()blivion> Some one replaced the white part of my generic Oreos with Toothpaste.... Awesome, now I can't even eat the cookie part (-____-) |
| [15/7 00:20 GMT] <kenshinsama> *Sigh* Shounen haters fail at life. |
| [15/7 00:18 GMT] <dilworks> I had tried to test Dirac, somewhere in 2009... encoder was shit, and had nothing but problems with the decoders. |
| [15/7 00:15 GMT] <OnDeed> the encoder was very low quality, and the format most likely wasn't competitive with h.264 itself (and by a big margin). If you want to see a wavelet codec in action, try snow in ffmpeg, taht toy is actually superior to Dirac (lol) |
| [15/7 00:14 GMT] <OnDeed> it was beyond crappy in reality. |
| [15/7 00:13 GMT] <dilworks> What the hell happened with Dirac? BBC sold it as the "next coming of Christ", even used it for the Olympics... and then, crickets. |
| [15/7 00:13 GMT] <OnDeed> http://code.google.com/p/x265/ --- if you meant this, then that has nothing to do with x264's team. |
| [15/7 00:12 GMT] <OnDeed> There is also the next-gen freetard codec, codenamed Daala. It's still in design phase, but finalization + writing of good encoder could take shorter time for it. Still at least 2 years before ready though, I'd say. 2 years at best, that is? |
| [15/7 00:11 GMT] <blackwidow_rsa> >they didn't make a "trial encoder". One guy did, but this was a while ago, different companies were proposing different features.He just made one with whatever was out ATT. My internet is as fslow, so google it yourself. |
| [15/7 00:09 GMT] <()blivion> Fuck it, I'm coding 10Bit + H.265 for PIC12... that doesn't even have hardware.... multiplication. |
| [15/7 00:05 GMT] <()blivion> (Unless we are calling K-On shonen now?) |
| [15/7 00:04 GMT] <OnDeed> Hey, I liked K-On! |
| [15/7 00:04 GMT] <OnDeed> hmm, nice from Qualcomm. In that case, H.265 might see a HW adoption. The problem of missing encoder stays though. Until there is a superior one, we'll stick to Hi10P H.264 |
| [15/7 00:04 GMT] <()blivion> Or K-On blows, and such. |
| [15/7 00:03 GMT] <dilworks> At least we aren't discussing about Shonen Fail or... Shonen Fail... |
| [15/7 00:01 GMT] <dilworks> What, nVidia implemented shittastic VP8 but no 10-bit H.264 on Tegra!? WTF!?!?! |
| [15/7 00:01 GMT] <()blivion> We are going to get yelled at for dominating the chat box... LOL |
| [15/7 00:00 GMT] <dilworks> Well, looks like Qualcomm wants to eat some of the H.265 SoC cake: http://reviews.cnet.com/8301-13970_7-57387626-78/qualcomm-shows-horsepower-of-next-gen-h.265-video/ |
| [15/7 00:00 GMT] <OnDeed> there are reference/proposal encoders, but they are made by the comitees/companies |
| [15/7 00:00 GMT] <OnDeed> there are reference/proposal encoders, but they are made by the comitees/companies |
| [14/7 23:59 GMT] <OnDeed> they didn't make a "trial encoder" |
| [14/7 23:59 GMT] <()blivion> @OnDeed: Not disputing that in any particular way. Actually, that was mostly the point, it sucks AND can do H.264. Not a streach to say a better unit could take this farther. |
| [14/7 23:57 GMT] <blackwidow_rsa> the x264 guys made a trial encoder, slow as shit though, they won't bother before the specs for h265 are finalized |
| [14/7 23:56 GMT] <OnDeed> every ARM SoC must have HW decoder if it wants to play video, basically. |
| [14/7 23:56 GMT] <OnDeed> and it's cpu is superweak... with no SIMD. |
| [14/7 23:54 GMT] <()blivion> *Raspberry |
| [14/7 23:54 GMT] <()blivion> Yeah, the 25$ Raspbery Pi supports H.264. |
| [14/7 23:51 GMT] <OnDeed> h.265 is close to finalization. |
| [14/7 23:50 GMT] <dilworks> But that was somewhere in 2010 - don't know the current status... |
| [14/7 23:50 GMT] <OnDeed> We don't need to think about H.265 much though, because so far there is no encoder being made, and x264 guys doesn't seem to be interested. A new format will be useless without an x264-class encoder. |
| [14/7 23:50 GMT] <()blivion> One of the h.26X specs is hardware supported in one of the cell SoC's. Can't recall which though. |
| [14/7 23:49 GMT] <dilworks> Last time that I've heard about H.265, proposed encoders either didn't ran at all, or were performing at MINUTES per frame... |
| [14/7 23:45 GMT] <OnDeed> not sure it happens though, maybe they will all jsut wait for adoption by content industry (chicken-egg) |
| [14/7 23:45 GMT] <OnDeed> H.265 is more likely to get HW acceleration though, especially since gpu/soc vendors could plan/design for that in advance |