February 21, 2007 9:55 AM PST
Virtual child porn may be a crime in Netherlands
- Related Stories
-
Thinking the unthinkable about kids and Net porn
February 9, 2007 -
Police blotter: Detecting computer-generated porn?
January 3, 2007 -
Federal case may redefine child porn
November 30, 2006
In the virtual world of Second Life, a popular Internet destination, everyone under the age of 18 is supposed to be limited to a "teen grid."
However, it would be relatively easy for children to get onto the adult grid if they wished since there is no proof of age required.
In the adult section, some users participate in "age play," in which adult users can create child-like characters and have virtual sex that would be illegal in the real world.
"There are possibilities to prosecute because it possibly incites child abuse," said Kitty Nooij, the spokesman for public prosecutor, who is in charge of national vice cases.
With the increasing popularity of virtual worlds, there are fears people may turn to them to carry out activities considered illegal in the real world.
There is no Dutch case law about virtual child pornography in writing, drawings or computer animation.
In the United States, where Second Life creator Linden Lab is based, the U.S. Supreme Court struck down a law in 2002 which would ban computer-generated images that depict minors engaged in sexual conduct.
Citizens who commit Internet crimes can be prosecuted in the country where they commit the offense under local laws.
Second Life has several hundred thousand regular users, although only a maximum of about 30,000 are logged in at any given time.
A majority of Second Life residents are from Europe, with about 35 percent from the United States.
Story Copyright © 2008 Reuters Limited. All rights reserved.
10 comments
Join the conversation! Add your comment
What makes the Netherlands feels that such age play between two consenting adults to be improper? Would it make a difference if it was done in real life between adults? Who's to say it's not already done?
The point I'm making is this: In a virtual world, things can and are done that is not possible, impractical, or illegal in some States or Countries...hence they stay in the virtual world. It's all ROLE PLAY.
Would the Netherlands like to ban Dungeons and Dragons because it depicts role playing of violent characters or situations such as burning people at the stake or run through with a sword?
What makes the Netherlands feels that such age play between two consenting adults to be improper? Would it make a difference if it was done in real life between adults? Who's to say it's not already done?
The point I'm making is this: In a virtual world, things can and are done that is not possible, impractical, or illegal in some States or Countries...hence they stay in the virtual world. It's all ROLE PLAY.
Would the Netherlands like to ban Dungeons and Dragons because it depicts role playing of violent characters or situations such as burning people at the stake or run through with a sword?
<a class="jive-link-external" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Misandry" target="_newWindow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Misandry</a>
Feminists are far sicker than virtual child sex!