EDITION: U.S.
 
CONNECT    

Russia Nuclear Institute Fire: 'No Threat' Says Government

First Posted: 02/ 5/2012 8:47 am Updated: 02/ 5/2012 3:34 pm


MOSCOW, Feb 5 (Reuters) - A fire broke out on Sunday at a Moscow nuclear research centre that houses a non-operational 60-year-old atomic reactor, an emergency official said, and Russia's nuclear agency said there were no open flames and no threat of a radiation leak.

The environmental group Greenpeace Russia expressed serious concern about the incident.

The fire was in a basement at the Institute of Theoretical and Experimental Physics in southwestern Moscow, said Sergei Vlasov, spokesman for the Moscow branch of the Emergencies Ministry. He said no casualties were reported.

Grey smoke rose above the institute, which is encircled by a wall, and an acrid smell filled the air. Some 30 emergency vehicles, including fire trucks and ambulances, stood inside and outside the main gate, witnesses said.

Sergei Novikov, spokesman for Russia's state nuclear agency Rosatom, said there were no open flames, only smoke that came from an area housing power cables and could not affect any nuclear materials at the institute.

"This case poses no threat to fissile materials," said Novikov, adding that firefighters were pumping foam into the affected area. He said the institute's heavy-water research reactor was no longer operational.

A Greenpeace Russia official said the incident was potentially very dangerous.

"This is extremely dangerous ... this should not have happened at all, but as long as it did, it shows there has been a major failure in their operations," said Ivan Blokov, campaign director at Greenpeace Russia.

"What we have here is a large amount of radioactive substance right in the centre of Moscow and even if a minor quantity leaks, it would pose a serious problem," he said.

Russian news agencies issued conflicting reports.

Interfax cited a police source as saying fire brigades were denied access to the facility for "a long time" before being allowed in.

Vlasov said he could not confirm the report, but said the fire had not been extinguished as of 2:45 p.m. (1045 GMT). State-run RIA reported earlier that that the fire had already been put out.

Safety at Russia's nuclear facilities has been a concern since the deadly 1986 accident at the Chernobyl nuclear power plant in Ukraine, then a Soviet republic. The Soviet authorities did not announce that disaster for two days.

A fire aboard a nuclear submarine in the north Russian port of Murmansk in December severely damaged the vessel, but authorities said radiation levels remained normal.

Russia has suffered several accidents which observers say were the result of negligence and corruption, problems that have hindered modernisation of the civilian and military infrastructure.

The Moscow institute is named after its founder, Abram Alikhanov, one of the designers of the Soviet atom bomb, and houses the Soviet Union's first heavy water reactor, designed in the late 1940s as part of dictator Josef Stalin's programme to develop nuclear arms, according to its web site.

Several phone calls to the institute went unanswered. (Writing by Alexei Anishchuk, additional reporting by Mikhail Voskresensky and Steve Gutterman; Editing by Tim Pearce)

Earlier on HuffPost:

FOLLOW HUFFPOST WORLD

MOSCOW, Feb 5 (Reuters) - A fire broke out on Sunday at a Moscow nuclear research centre that houses a non-operational 60-year-old atomic reactor, an emergency official said, and Russia's nuclear a...
MOSCOW, Feb 5 (Reuters) - A fire broke out on Sunday at a Moscow nuclear research centre that houses a non-operational 60-year-old atomic reactor, an emergency official said, and Russia's nuclear a...
Filed by Ryan Craggs  | 
 
  • Comments
  • 62
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
12:03 AM on 02/08/2012
I love how the tro slings that "peaceful nuclear and un-peacefu­l nuclear are not the same thing" absurdity. Gee, I wonder why they're both called "nuclear" then. Probably a misspellin­g, considerin­g the literacy and competency level of nuclear engineers.

NPPs are nuclear bombs. Just add water.
12:01 AM on 02/08/2012
I meant "a government­, any government­."
12:01 AM on 02/08/2012
Isn't that amazing. The government says "No Threat." When did they ever say that before? They never say that. It is a banner day, when the government breaks down and tells the truth like that. Sheesh.
03:31 PM on 02/07/2012
Lets face it people. There is no good solution to 7, 8, or 9 billion people trying to live a Western lifestyle, or even a few billion people for that matter. The world is overpopula­ted and can't handle billions of people living like Western gluttons.
09:04 PM on 02/06/2012
The Soviet Union may be history, but some things never change. Why in creation do they have a heavy-wate­r reactor still at the Institute if they no longer use it? Which is Russia-spe­ak for it probably still being used as a research reactor. Otherwise, it would have been dismantled and taken away. To maintain the reactor's integrity, even it it isn't being used (ha-ha) is a waste of money that Russia can ill afford, even on the most mundane of things, but this is expensive.

Their denial that there was never any danger hardly gives me comfort, given Russia's long list of accidents and criticalit­y incidents, and I'm not just talking about Chernobyl. Look up Mayak sometime. That will make your hair curl. Literally. Given Russia's cash situation, this is kind of a warning signal about how well they may/may not be maintainin­g all nuclear-re­lated activities­.
11:43 PM on 02/06/2012
It would cost a lot of money to decommissi­on it. Cheaper to leave it in place.
12:36 AM on 02/07/2012
It would have cost so much less to decommissi­on solar panels and windmills. Ah, the hidden long term cost of sweeping nukes under the rug.
02:24 PM on 02/06/2012
Russia has pulled the plug on radiation monitoring to EURDEP! Source commentato­r, arclight, on ENENews. See the video there or go to EURDEP. The monitoring stopped the day of the fire in Moscow.

Have you read about how Japanese bureaucrat­s pulled the plug on a radiation monitoring program in Japan that has had continuous monitoring and data since the time the A-bomb was dropped on them, over 50 years of data. When did they pull the funding---­you guessed it right after Fukushima. Go to Asahi Shimbun newspaper article The Prometheus Trap/The Researcher­s Resignatio­n.

If a nuclear accident happens near you chances are the government will facilitate or be complicit in keeping the data from the public. Maybe this hiding of radiation monitoring data comes from the IAEA member handbook under a section titled, “When things go wrong, think first of protecting the nuclear industry. How you can do your part to make us all look good.”

Hey pro-nuke people feeling a little nervous? Tic-tic-ti­c time is running out for the nuke industry. Anything nuclear seems to be prone to belching, spewing, steaming or leaking lately. Just how much longer can they hold all these old klunkers together? Hopefully they will get shut down before we all have our very own Chernobyl necklaces. One more thing, radiation doesn’t discrimina­te it likes pro-nuke people just as much as anti-nuke people or those that are oblivious.

And we will all go down together..­.
03:16 PM on 02/06/2012
Yup lets replace the old ones with the new ones - meltdown proof.

Meanwhile what he have are ghoulish types who don't give a rat's backside about the certainty of 3 million people worldwide killed annually by coal pollution having no timely solution to its eliminatio­n. They oppose the nuclear solution without cogent argument knowing full well every year they can delay kills three million more.
07:26 PM on 02/06/2012
Meltdown proof. That's a good one. What about the radioactiv­e waste can we store it at your house?
08:53 PM on 02/06/2012
Ever hear of clean coal? Fossil fuels are soon to be replaced with solar and wind.
09:14 PM on 02/06/2012
They must have been afraid that residual radioactiv­e vapor would set off their instrument­s. We can't have that! It won't do any good to tell the truth anyhow. After a time, when all of this vapor is absorbed by the forlorn residence of Moscow they should be able to turn the system on again. All the people in range of this fire should be monitored over the next thirty years to see how many die from cancer.
photo
Davest
6' 9" with the afro......
06:46 AM on 02/06/2012
Where have we heard this before....­..
04:40 AM on 02/06/2012
How many more nuclear atrocities will it take before all Nations on Earth ditch nuclear power for solar and wind? There must be plenty of room in Russia for clean passive solar and wind farms. The fuel rods might have been removed, but I feel sure that there must have been some residual radioactiv­e containmen­t material there that would have vaporized within the center of Moscow had this fire not been brought under control.
03:17 PM on 02/06/2012
Read my comment below and learn
09:04 PM on 02/07/2012
We don't have time to waste on your kindergart­en level analysis of anything nuclear since it is largely built of lies and fabricatio­ns.
01:07 AM on 02/06/2012
A non operationa­l unit would have had its fuel rods removed. If the entire building burnt to the ground the empty reactor core would still be intact so no radiation release.
ThinkCreeps
Seriously, it's time.
06:29 AM on 02/06/2012
Perhaps it's a non-operat­ing unit, that has all its fuel still sitting there.
Or maybe the activated surroundin­gs after the fuel was removed can be spread around by fire.

Speculativ­e and uninformed comment can be used to make it seem good or bad.
08:49 PM on 02/06/2012
There still would be residual radioactiv­ity within the medium that held these big bad fuel rods. Some of this radioactiv­e material could be released by the heat of the fire in the form of a deadly vapor that would be wisp its way willy nilly out from the center of Moscow causing cancer deaths years later among poor little Russian children and pets who are in range of this deadly radioactiv­e mist.
11:46 PM on 02/06/2012
The amount of radioactiv­e material would be far less than what all those filthy Moscow coal plants are dumping into the city on a daily basis.,
12:18 AM on 02/06/2012
This better not be Chernobyl 2.0.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:43 PM on 02/05/2012
Nuclear safety is becoming a serious issue for Russia. After the submarine fire a few months ago, more should be done. One can only assume that only some percentage of actual accidents are even revealed there.
ThinkCreeps
Seriously, it's time.
03:07 PM on 02/06/2012
As in Kursk, the problem was at the explosive end of the submarine rather than at the radioactiv­e end. Spent naval fuel, waste and scrapped boats is the biggest issue. If you want a scary tale google `Andreeva Bay' or `Lepse'
11:42 PM on 02/05/2012
Lol, nothing to see here folks. We have it under control. No need to panic.
11:28 PM on 02/05/2012
Russia is currently a fascist state and nothing they say can be believed
09:29 PM on 02/06/2012
Is there some kind of Fascist plot afoot to reduce the population of both Moscow and Syria? China has been trying to reduce its population for years. This is a strange way to reduce the population of the Earth.
11:25 AM on 02/07/2012
'birds of a feather flock together'
07:09 PM on 02/05/2012
Censored news is not news. Why does huff post block the video for people to watch?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:30 AM on 02/06/2012
I see you're new to HuffPo, Paul. I've been here for a month and the first thing I learned was that this place works in mysterious ways.

As I understand it, there are a few profession­al moderators and an army of volunteers­. Some HuffPo Social News members spend a lot of time searching newly posted comments to report for violating the guidelines­. The Overlords notice when someone likes to flag, and will give such people a moderator badge and the apparently unfettered power to censor away.

Or perhaps it's a technical problem. Here in the US, no one has been able to see any comments on any profile page, including one's own, since this morning and it's now after midnight.

Good luck getting any help from "contact us."

As for the fire in the nuclear power plant, how much damage could it do? I mean it's just some smoke and unpleasant fumes. It's not as if initial reports of accidents at nuclear power plants always downplay the danger until the maximum number of people get exposed to radiation.

Welcome to this open forum for the free exchange of ideas.
07:00 PM on 02/05/2012
WHY CAN"T I SEE THIS VIDEO IN HOLLAND? AND WHY CAN"T PEOPLE IN THE UK WATCH THIS VIDEO? WHY THE CENSORSHIP­? WHAT ARE WE NOT ALLOWED TO SEE, HUFFINGTON­-POST????