U.S. Government
International
Academic, Non-Governmental
Governments around the world are beginning to take action on a newly recognized climate threat that has been right in front of our eyes for decades: the soot that spews from diesel engines and that forms hazy blankets over villages using wood- and dung-burning cook-stoves and areas where forests have been cleared by burning.
Soot, or black carbon, is believed to be responsible for 18 percent of the planet’s warming, an impact that wasn't well understood just two years ago when the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change released its latest report.
“Black carbon is now commonly believed to be the second most important climate forcing agent after carbon dioxide,” says Erika Rosenthal, an international program attorney for Earthjustice.
At a meeting of the Arctic Council today in Norway, the United States, Russia, Canada and other Arctic nations took the first step to begin reducing that danger by establishing a task force that will examine ways to decrease the global production of soot.
In the United States, an unlikely coalition of U.S. senators – including both Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.) and chief climate change denier James Inhofe (R-Okla.) – recently introduced a bill to similarly look into ways to curtail black carbon emissions. The U.S. stimulus package also contained money to decrease soot, and other projects in Europe and developing countries around the world have begun to address the problem.
The Arctic Council's action today was spurred by a recent study that determined black carbon was the cause of half of the warming in the Arctic in the last 120 years.
Wind currents carry soot from North America, Europe and Asia to the Arctic region, where the particles darken the ice and absorb heat. The melting of the Arctic carries multiple climate dangers, from rising sea levels to the release of greenhouses gases such as methane frozen in the permafrost.
The task force will recommend actions to be taken and will report to the council, which is composed of Canada, Denmark, Greenland, Finland, Iceland, Norway, Sweden, Russia and the United States, at their next meeting in 2011.
The Boxer-Inhofe bill in the U.S. Senate would give a similar task to the EPA: In the next year, define black carbon, find its sources and ways to reduce it, and determine funding for such solutions. (Inhofe's support was prompted by the health dangers tied to soot.)
One key to begin solving the problem of black carbon in the Arctic is developing standards for the diesel engines of marine ships the enter the area, Rosenthal says. Last month, the EPA applied to the International Maritime Organization to establish standards for all international ships that enter U.S. territorial areas. However, it did not include the Arctic waters.
Soot emissions and disel engines
Particulate (including black carbon) emissions have been steadliy declining from new diesel engines since 1994. New standards that went into effect in 2007 cut the PM emissions by 98 percent from pre 2007 levels (from 0.10 g/BHP-hr to 0.01 g/BHP-hr).
And, all new diesel engines in new clean diesel cars and commercial big-rig trucks have diesel particulate filters that trap and destroy any remaining particles in the exhaust.
Substantial efforts are underway to modernize and upgrade existing diesel engines in on and off road machines and equipment with particulate filters and other devices . The Diesel EMissions Reduction Act was mentioned here. Recent Recovery Act funding has plowed $300 Million into upgrading diesel engines all across the country.
For more information on visit www.dieselforum.org
.
I think a lot of people
I think a lot of people relate arctic warming to just being carbon dioxide, and I must admit I didn't realize that soot was as big an influence as the video suggests. Out of interest, where was this video produced? I really like the entertaining method it uses to teach. Out of all contributors to soot pollution, which are the largest? Is it diesel-engine ships that contribute the most?
Post new comment