Moon's mountains made by slo-mo crash: study

The Moon's highlands, long a mystery, may have been thrown up billions of years ago by a slow-motion collision with a smaller companion moon knocked off its orbit, says a study released Wednesday.

With mountain ranges topping 3,000 metres (10,000 feet) and deep craters, the farside of the Moon bears scant resemblance to the smoother surface and shallow lava-filled maria, or "seas", on the nearside visible from Earth.

Scientists have proffered many explanations for this split personality, also known as the "lunar dichotomy".

Some point to uneven tidal heating, the process by which energy from rotation and orbit deform a planet's outer crust.

Others argue that lopsided bombardment by asteroids and comets explain our Moon's Janus-faced exterior.

But a pair of researchers from the University of California at Santa Cruz, Martin Jutzi and Erik Asphaug, have proposed a new storyline for the sculpting of the lunar landscape, one that reaches back to the Moon's very origins.

Their findings, published in Nature, tie up loose ends that other theories cannot account for, they said.

Not long after Earth took shape more than four billion years ago it was likely struck a glancing blow by a Mars-sized body, an event called the giant-impact hypothesis.

The Moon is thought to be composed of the debris cast off by that collision, which probably created other, smaller, moon-like bodies as well.

As our solar system evolved toward its current configuration, none of these lesser orbs were likely to have survived very long -- unless they landed in a sweet spot called an Earth-Moon Trojan point.

At least one such mini-moon, about a third the diameter of the one we see today, could have been suspended between the gravitational pulls of the Moon and Earth for tens of millions of years, they calculated.

Eventually, however, it would have lost its moorings and crashed into the Moon, which was covered at that point by a magma ocean topped by a crystallised crust.

At high speed, planet-scale collisions create monstrous craters and vast amounts of vaporised debris, mostly melted by the intense heat.

But because the mini-moon, due to its position, would have been moving at a much slower speed -- about two-to-three kilometres per second -- the impact would have left a rim of mountains.

"According to our simulations, a large 'moon-to-Moon' size ratio and a subsonic impact velocity lead to an accretionary pile rather than a crater," Jutzi and Asphaug concluded.

This scenario would also help explain why the farside's crust is so much thicker, and why certain minerals are concentrated there, the study said.

"The current study demonstrates plausibility rather than proof," MIT researcher Maria Zuber cautioned in a commentary, also in Nature, noting that the origins of the farside highlands have been "a topic of speculation since the first global measurements of the Moon's shape."

Because the rubble that became the mountains would have crystallised millions of years earlier than the Moon, examining the age of the soil would be one way to confirm the study, but no such samples are available.

The new theory could also be bolstered -- or challenged -- by data expected next year from the NASA's Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter mission, as well as high-resolution gravity mapping to be done by the Agency's Gravity Recovery and Interior Laboratory (GRAIL).

14 comments

  • Llarry Llamma
    Llarry Llamma 2 hours ago
    2-3 km/s (2000-3000m/s) is not sub-sonic! The speed of sound is roughly 340m/s but then again I don't know why the author would even mention the speed of sound since they're referencing motion in a vacuum through which sound cannot travel.
  • theecmo
    theecmo 4 hours ago
    Maybe one side has fewer impacts and upheaval because the Earth blocks most of what would have hit that side? If the smooth side faced away from Earth I would be confused, but the way it is it seems pretty obvious why the side facing open space has more craters on it.
  • Bart
    Bart 2 hours ago
    Guess I'll post this instead of just replying. Current theory has the moon forming much closer to the Earth and has slowly drifted to its present position. It was probably not locked the Earth at first. This impact (assuming the theory is proven) may have helped cause the moon to lock one face toward us.
    The impact side may have less dense material so the Earths gravity had more drag on the heavy side (like spinning a lopsided wheel vertically) slowly stopping the apparent rotation.
  • p
    p 3 hours ago
    "subsonic impact velocity" is an odd term to be used for something occurring in a vacuum. Is it the speed of sound through the rocky bodies or are they using the earth-atmosphere definition?
  • LAST CALL
    LAST CALL 2 hours ago
    LOL!!! ok genius. if this so called smaller moon was suspended between the earth and its current moon, how could it have collided with the far side of the moon which would have been facing away from it?
  • Robert C
    Robert C 4 hours ago
    What does Obama have to do with the Moon?
  • UH...NO
    UH...NO about an hour ago
    When I was in school, we were taught that those mountains were created by the activities of Lord Load and his Merry Band of Swallowers which also resulted in the Fisher building and the Yellowstone super volcano. But that was on Deneb IV - public school and all that...
  • Mark
    Mark 5 minutes ago
    Does anyone know has physics well to answer me this? Would the gravity on Earth have been great or smaller before the crash. I've always thought that Earth gravity was smaller/less in the past, allowing ancient exo skeleton creature to grow larger that what they can grow now. Those Devonian centipedes fossils look too big to exist today. Could this change in mass of the moons or the addition of asteroid mass have changed our gravity and if so, which way?
  • James
    James 4 hours ago
    I thought it was from that Transformer crash?
  • The Friar
    The Friar 2 hours ago
    More likely it is that asteroid that is in the same orbit as the Earth and ahead of us.
  • Lakelife
    Lakelife 2 hours ago
    And what if they are ALL wrong and the truth has never been told. A "Natural Sattleite" that NEVER deviates, therefore always has the same side facing the Earth. Just"One" sizeable impact at an angle would impart it's energy and induce,(even if minor) a slight spin.But no, Gravity fron Earth,Sun, whatever just keeps everything perfect.If one shoots a suspended Tennis ball at an angle with a BB gun, what happens? It spins. Just one thing of many that do not make sense.Older Astronomers wondered, and the Scientists of the present won't utter a word,dare they lose their funding or face ridicule. It's Origin? Many other questions to answer first. The questions of "Common Sense", and the Laws of Motion, or lack of. Ponder away or be distracted. That is what is being achieved.Thanks.
  • Jerry
    Jerry 4 hours ago
    Because one side is always away from the earth it catches all the stuff that would have hit the earth if the moon wasn't there. Didn't happen in a day it happened over billions of years and is still happening. Put that in the 'puter and run the simulation.
  • drill4you
    drill4you 2 hours ago
    asteroids, hemorroids..one strains my eyes the other strains my butt...
  • KeithT
    KeithT 3 hours ago
    Is this like old stuff to make us think we are still exploring out there?