advertisement
January 12, 2011 8:47 AM PST

Book Saver device takes a page from CD rippers

by Greg Sandoval

Here's something that could have publishers quaking in their books: gadget makers continue to look for ways to do for books what the CD ripper did for music.

The CD ripper helped fuel music piracy online. Will Book Saver and similar devices do the same for books?

(Credit: Ion Audio)

Ion Audio, a company known for helping vinyl-record owners digitize their music, says it will trot out sometime this summer a device called the Book Saver, according to a story on Engadget. Ion said the Book Saver is capable of digitizing a 200-page book in 15 minutes. An owner of a Book Saver, which will likely sell for $150, places a book into the scanning cradle and the device makes color copies in seconds, thanks to two cameras hanging above the book.

"Once converted, the books can quickly be transferred to a computer or e-reader," Ion said on its Web site. "Book Saver is the only device needed to quickly make all your books, comics, magazines, or other documents e-reader compatible."

What the company doesn't mention is that devices such as Book Saver will make it even easier for people to share books online. Ask anyone at the major labels about the rise of file sharing and they typically blame the Internet as well as the inclusion of CD rippers in computers. Ripping music and loading it on to digital music players was a cinch after that.

And like CD rippers, Ion says Book Saver is perfectly legal. The courts have ruled that it's legal for people to make copies of their media for personal use.

Book publishing has wrestled with piracy for years, but one of the reasons the sector hasn't been hit as hard by illegal file sharing as much as the music or film industries is that there isn't an easy way to digitize books. Scanning them is typically labor intensive.

And Book Saver suffers from the same problem. The scanning process on the device, while not as time consuming as the old way, is still nowhere as easy to use as a CD ripper. According to Engadget, there's no automated way to turn pages and an owner needs to lift the device to turn every page.

Book publishers should know that eventually someone or some company, maybe even Ion, will streamline the process.

Correction at 2 p.m. PT: This story incorrectly stated the kind of technology used to extract data from CDs and transfer them onto hard drives. The correct term is ripper.

E-mail Greg Sandoval

If you have a question or comment for Greg Sandoval, you can submit it here. However, because our editors and writers receive hundreds of requests, we cannot tell you when you may receive a response.

Submit your question or comment here: 0 of 1500 characters

Greg Sandoval covers media and digital entertainment for CNET News. He is a former reporter for The Washington Post and the Los Angeles Times.

Recent posts from Media Maverick
Bye-bye, physical media? Sony closes CD plant
Book Saver device takes a page from CD rippers
Senate to try again on controversial antipiracy bill
Antipiracy lawyers from porn, indie-film sectors unite
Supreme Court won't block antitrust suit against labels
Apple doesn't want to reveal CEO succession plans
Stopping illegal file sharing a low priority for DOJ?
Will Hollywood's 'UltraViolet' plan replace the DVD?
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (32 Comments)
  • prev
  • next
by javawebdeveloper January 12, 2011 9:24 AM PST
CD Burning took off because it was fast and effortless. This looks to be way too time consuming and labor intensive to ever hit the mainstream.
Reply to this comment 3 people like this comment
by ghostofitpast January 12, 2011 9:35 AM PST
I tend to agree. Also, the cradle seems to be far too limited to accommodate the considerable variation in book size. There are far more sophisticated book scanners out there, but they are far beyond the budge of the individual consumer. My guess it that, over the long haul, this device will not improve on the effort required to do the same thing with a flatbed scanner.
by QA_Tester January 12, 2011 10:21 AM PST
Even if a small number of people start doing this it will make an impact.
by cwmaxson January 12, 2011 2:15 PM PST
Text... Books...
3 people like this comment
by Orengeman January 12, 2011 9:29 AM PST
I'm curious about one thing: if "there's no automated way to turn pages and an owner needs to lift the device to turn every page" then how, exactly, does Ion figure that "that the Book Saver is capable of digitizing a 200-page book in 15 minutes"?
Reply to this comment 2 people like this comment
by blenderwasher January 12, 2011 10:47 AM PST
Scanning a 200 page book would require ~100 page turns. That comes out to a page turn every 9 seconds. It might be hard to keep up that pace for 15 minutes straight, but it doesn't sound extremely unrealistic
by Applerocks1963_ January 12, 2011 1:31 PM PST
Don't forget, in those 9 seconds you also have to reposition that camera contraption after each page turn. God forbid the pages stick together.


I don't see this being useful except in an actual library or someplace where they are actually in the business of archiving old books. Plus the reality of whether digital archives of books will actually outlast the real book remains to be seen. There are books that have lasted hundreds of years, I have doubts about whether a harddrive, flash drive, or optical disc would ever last as long or even if they could be accessed by future generations.
1 person likes this comment
by Mergatroid Mania January 13, 2011 11:10 AM PST
I can do the same job in close to the same amount of time with the flatbed scanner on my all-in-one. Sure, I have to lift the book to turn the page, but with this contraption you have to lift the entire contraption to turn a page. I think I could scan a book almost as fast with my all-in-one.

If I was a BIG ebook reader and just didn't bother with paper books anymore, I would wreck the bindings in my books and feed the pages through the document feeder and scan them really fast. Although your physical book would be ruined, your scans would be awesome since you would have no book binding causing the scan no be uneven.

Of course you would have to add the time to remove the pages from the book binding, however the end result would be far superior.
by timgray1 January 12, 2011 9:30 AM PST
As long as it takes photos good enough for the open source OCR and ebok apps can convert them to usable epub files. I was going to build one from a set of digital cameras, but this is smaller and far cheaper than anything I can build myself.

Here's to converting the old out of print dead trees I have to useable epubs!
Reply to this comment
by rjblogster January 12, 2011 9:56 AM PST
Let's just fast forward now and eliminate all need to pay royalties on copyrighted material. If it's a thought and for sure if it's created anywhere then it should be freely accessible by others! Free copies everywhere and to everyone. Oh what creative shutdown and fallout from this move that may occur but what the heck - ones right to free personal copies trumps all!. Better just free all at once than the slow death that free dissemination of copyrighted material has wrought upon the music industry. Only the lawyers have truly benefited from such agony. Given the hard and fast position of free personal copies backstopping all device/technology creations capable of reproducing copyrighted material, the only fallback for entire industries and their economic beneficiaries is the assurance of mankind's honesty. Oh boy - we're in good hands now. Thank god there are an abundance of proficient bloggers, authors, music and creative media creators and the like who have other means of support themselves and their dependents. Now onto the scientific community such as the creators of cures for disease. Surely a free model for disseminating their works must be in the offing as well. Bet that will speed disease cure research don't ya think? Oh the logic of all this nonsense is just so refreshing.
Reply to this comment 1 person likes this comment
by QA_Tester January 12, 2011 10:30 AM PST
@rjblogster

The problem is not with concept of royalties, but rather with royalty costs and inefficiencies of distributing a book. Digital publishing and distribution model can take care of a lot of those problems. While there is still cost of software needed to produce books in right format, that can easily go away. All it takes is for a company that will accept an uploaded document of any size in any format and convert it to any other format for a small fee the cost of having to maintain several copies of various software will go away.
by DENOBIN January 12, 2011 2:43 PM PST
You are assuming that everyone is a thief and therefore everyone should be denied an easier way to exercise fair use privileges. Oh the logic of your nonsense is just so refreshing *not*
1 person likes this comment
by TerrinBell January 12, 2011 4:33 PM PST
The problem is copyright holders have abused their lobbying power. Originally a copyright lasted ten years, then the public could use the work to the benefit of all. All works after all borrow ideas from other. Now copyrights last over a hundred years. The public has lost their benefit.

IN the area of patents where companies have the money to lobby for themselves, patents only last 14 years.
1 person likes this comment
by Mergatroid Mania January 13, 2011 11:19 AM PST
@rjblogster

So, you're suggesting that people who own books should not be able to convert them to ebooks? Because I find that to be completely unacceptable, and I'm sure a lot of other people do as well.
by mcrumph January 12, 2011 10:24 AM PST
I too have a great many used/out of print books. The interesting thing is, the books will probably last longer than the digital copies that are made of them. I have a number of books printed in the late 19th c. and are still in great shape. Can you say the same thing about digital media created today?
Reply to this comment 1 person likes this comment
by El_Segfaulto January 12, 2011 12:47 PM PST
I'll let you know in 100 years.
6 people like this comment
by Mergatroid Mania January 13, 2011 11:25 AM PST
If the content is backed up, and transferred to other devices over time, then a digital copy can far outlast a paper copy. Unfortunately the industry seems to be dead set against out right to fair use, and copying your econtent to other devices MAY not be possible in all instances.

To flip the coin, I can foresee some works disappearing entirely if the companies selling them remove them for various reasons and the only copies available are on people's ereading devices, which in turn only last a finite period of time and are riddled with DRM that MAY prevent them from backing up their content or transferring it to an "unapproved" device. This could lead to the complete loss of some works. Of course, it's a "worst case" scenario but it COULD happen.
by dbargen January 12, 2011 10:32 AM PST
The only effective way I've found to scan in my books is to first take them out of their binding, and them drop the whole thing in a feed scanner. Of course, if you want to have your book back in one piece, you have to take some pains to reassemble it, but if you don't care, then you're good to go.

If only there were some affordable OCR software, then my books could go straight to ePub format instead a giant, image-based PDF.
Reply to this comment 2 people like this comment
by dumbspammers January 12, 2011 11:12 AM PST
There is affordable OCR software (I assume you can afford a free download): http://www.simpleocr.com/
1 person likes this comment
by Mergatroid Mania January 13, 2011 11:28 AM PST
A lot of scanners and all-in-ones actually come with free ocr software.
by QA_Tester January 13, 2011 4:44 PM PST
@dbargen


Who cares if it's in giant PDF. Storage is cheap and it is possible to convert PDF to other formats including ePub.
by svgtom January 12, 2011 11:07 AM PST
Even though it looks like this process is time consuming, people will do it. People are already copying books now and disseminating them electronically even though the quality of many leave much to be desired. It's not that hard to find digital copies of the Harry Potter books even though J.K. Rowling has refused to allow them to be sold in eBook format.
Reply to this comment
by furball123A January 12, 2011 11:30 AM PST
Where this would be of the greatest use is in libraries who couldn't afford the thousands to buy an automated machine...but could find $300-500 to get a few of these. From there...they could put their rare books through the scanner once and allow for use of students/scholars without giving them physical access to the book.
Reply to this comment 1 person likes this comment
by ramsespride January 12, 2011 6:04 PM PST
If a library has books valuable enough to warrant not loaning them out, I also doubt that library is so hard up for money that they'd need one of these contraptions.
by Rohou January 12, 2011 10:01 PM PST
@ramsepride I think the intention was so that as many students could gain access to the books they need when they need them. Surely you've gone to the library to obtain a novel for a literature class only to find out your a day late.
1 person likes this comment
by solitare_pax January 13, 2011 2:30 AM PST
I have a cousin who volunteers at his state library transcribing Civil War era letters from soldiers into text files that will make it easier for people to access and download information to get a better idea what they went through in those day - and no OCR program can make out those scribbles!

Other folks volunteer online for Project Gutenberg - another worthy cause.
by aj37 January 12, 2011 11:37 AM PST
I think high-volume publishers will have little to fear. Book-copying with this device is still going to fall within the threshold where if a book is readily available, it's easier and cheaper just to buy another copy.

Instead, these devices will get used mostly for exactly the kinds of legitimate uses Ion envisions: family albums, old Bibles with genealogy information written in, cookbooks or textbooks with your own marginal notes, and handwritten lab notebooks, casebooks, ledgers, etc., as well as old printed books too fragile for routine handling.

Kudos to Ion for a clever concept that addresses an unmet need... assuming then results are good, of course. Bibliophiles tend to be picky.
Reply to this comment 1 person likes this comment
by CannibalCat January 12, 2011 12:19 PM PST
Actually, if you're willing to destroy the original, it's a fairly simple process to copy a book.
Cut the pages out from the spine and feed them into a scanner with a document feeder.

That's how I scan my supplier's catalogs into my computer, at least, and since they always send me three catalogs each month, I don't mind destroying one to get a digital record of it.
Reply to this comment 1 person likes this comment
by sdipaola January 12, 2011 2:01 PM PST
Buy extra book ( nominal cost), cut it out of binder so you get separates pages, put it in document feeder and hit scan, get coffee. Seems easier and way a more accurate, clearer and more high resolution than this method. And you do not have to sit there and turn pages. Many do this already, so the revolution is already here - just look at all the books on line.
Reply to this comment
by January 12, 2011 4:08 PM PST
Genealogy anyone? Short publish runs of family history..........
Reply to this comment
by KateGallison January 13, 2011 8:37 AM PST
I would have liked this for scanning my backlist for the purposes of putting it up on Kindle and other e-formats. Even if it took half an hour a book, that would be several hours less than my present method, using a regular scanner, mashing the book under the lid, and so forth.
Reply to this comment
by beowulf74 January 13, 2011 11:17 AM PST
I predict book manufacturers will sue to prevent the sale of this device. :-(
Reply to this comment 1 person likes this comment
(32 Comments)
  • prev
  • next
advertisement
Click Here
CNET River
  • loricnet: RT @SonyAlphaRumors: Sony NEX-5 now comes in GOLD. http://fun.ly/81vw

  • mollywood: Good post from @computerworld on which manufacturers deliver the timeliest Android updates. http://bit.ly/geagWA

  • stshank: Curiosity: Rain leaves drops on our windows. Warm glass-->raindrops evaporate-->glass cools-->condensation spots inside where drops are.

  • maggie_reardon: Here's this week's Ask Maggie. I try to help one reader decide between the iPhone and a slew of Verizon Droids. http://bit.ly/gXa6l7

  • loricnet: oooh. pretty. RT @diyphotography: Flash bulb at 1052 FPS ==> http://bit.ly/hJ1eur

  • jetscott: NY Post's "Return of the Jet-i" themed cover is absolutely brilliant. (sure, Rex is more like Jabba, but go with it)

  • loricnet: RT @stshank: .Rules-based bulk editing for Lightroom: http://bit.ly/gVMfUC

  • stshank: Has anybody ever seen a Pretec memory card in the wild? Just curious.

  • DavidCarnoy: Rumor: No home button for iPad 2 and next iPhone? Good idea or bad? http://t.co/rDuesBH

  • caro: NJ Sen. Menendez now giving talk at Newark YMCA event about importance of remembering MLK's political civility in light of Tucson shooting.

  • mlamonica: Toyota developing induction motors for hybrids to cut dependence on rare earth metal neodymium from China, in WSJ http://on.wsj.com/fkfyVd

  • caro: I got to personally congratulate @corybooker for that awesome tweet about wanting to bust @sn00ki for texting while driving. Victory!

  • stshank: A line I just deleted from Monday's story: "Of course, when the singularity comes and computers rule the world, all bets are off."

  • mlamonica: VC argues that residential solar financing (less than $1K up front) is good for consumers, better than big solar plants http://bit.ly/dW5hL3

  • mlamonica: RE World: Buy American Policy for Solar -- Who Cares? DoD is not big buyer of solar, won't help US #solar manufacturing http://bit.ly/gW3YVU

  • caro: Watching @corybooker address the crowd at the Newark YMCA's MLK Day event: "We cannot allow change unless we allow ourselves to be changed."

  • stshank: Google adds some hierarchy to Chrome development: http://bit.ly/dJTDTF

  • mlamonica: Reuters: investing in fossil fuels outpacing renewables (in public companies) http://reut.rs/gM7Npe

  • jetscott: The more people say Wes Welker's press conference was "hilarious," the more I think that humor and sports don't really mix.

advertisement

A 'Jeopardy' challenge for, and from, IBM

Years of R&D went into Watson, a computer that can process human language in order to take on the most formidable champs of game-show smarts.

Concept cars drive 2011 Detroit auto show

photos Concept cars unveiled at Detroit ranged from the futuristic to the pedestrian, some showing outlandish never-to-reach-production elements and others a mere beta before the model that will roll out of the factory.

About Media Maverick

In covering digital media for CNET News, Greg Sandoval has broken stories on Apple, Microsoft, YouTube, The Pirate Bay, and the digital efforts of the major music labels and Hollywood studios. Before that, in his first tour with CNET News, he covered e-commerce during the dot-com boom and bust. A dogged investigative reporter, he began his journalism career at the Los Angeles Times and followed that with a short TV stint at The E! True Hollywood Story. Later, he spent three years as a staff writer for The Washington Post. Greg is an alumnus of USC and was raised in Chatsworth, California, which is distinguishable only for being the porn capital of the world.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Media Maverick topics

advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right