忘れ去られた声:生きた歴史
第二次世界大戦アジアの被害
背景
ヨーロッパでの第二次世界大戦の虐殺の記録は西洋世界では正しく記録され教育にも広く反映されている。同時に人権侵害を含むアジアでの第二次世界大戦の歴史の研究や教育は遅れている。アジアへの無関心は政治的、経済的、文化的要素がさまざまに複雑にからんでいる。日本政府の日本帝国軍隊による戦争犯罪を今日まで認めない態度は東アジア諸国や世界の平和と和解への障壁となっている。
カナダの教育は包括的カリキュラムに基づいている。トロント・アルファ(ALPHA:Association for Learning and Preserving the History of WWII in Asia第二次世界大戦アジアの戦争の歴史を学び伝える会)は2010年10月人権侵害の歴史の中で重要ではあるが忘れ去られたページについてカナダの教育者と学生に対して広範囲でユニークな学習の機会を提供する。
カナダの学生は世界的視野で戦争や紛争を研究することにより、グローバル市民として立ち上がり社会的正義、相互信頼、人種的調和の価値を守るための技術、知識、態度を養う。
戦争は65年前の1945年8月15日に終わった。年老いた被害者の声が忘れ去られる中でこの生きた歴史は集団記憶喪失に埋没し置き去りにされている。教育者の挑戦はこの歴史を復活させ学生に教えることである。
2010年国際教育会議でアジアの戦争が残した虐殺の歴史を学習
2010年10月トロント・アルファは教育者のための教育会議を主催する。これは史上初めての試みである。約500人が会議、展示、関連活動に参加する。
中国、韓国、日本、北アメリカから幸存者、学者、教育者、活動家がカナダに招待され、シンポジュウム、講演、ワークショップ、その他の教育活動でそれぞれの経験、洞察、知識を披露する。
会議の期間中、学習の他に展示会、演劇、映画祭も行われる。高校生の活動も同時進行して各会場で繰り広げられる。
Presentation for
(Sep. 30-Oct.3, 2010)
“
The importance
of accepting the death toll
“over 300,000”
Yoshiyuki
Masaki
October, 2010
My name is Yoshiyuki Masaki. I am now representing Japan ALPHA. I’m
a retired professor who taught English
for decades in Japanese schools. Besides my academic works, I translated the
book "The Rape of Nanking--an Undeniable History in Photographs" and
documentaries and films on atrocities committed by the Japanese such as
"In the Name of the Emperor", "Murder under the Sun", “Nanking”,
“Iris Chang: The Rape of Nanking”, "Historical Analysis", “The City
of Life and Death”, “Torn Memories of
This year on a memorial day of August 15 we had the honor of inviting
Author Erna Paris to
Lenin says "Cinema is
for us the most important of arts."
And Russian film director Elem Klimov says, "Herein lies the
sense of creative work, when you can offer to people something real serious,
real meaningful..."
I can see what they say is true by screening the films in
What is the most important problem that is facing
“Censuses revealed that at least 300,000
people were killed. Until the present day the Japanese government has refused
to officially acknowledge the extent of the Rape of
Let me say that this number “300,000” is the key to solve the history
issues that
Let me show you here, to start with, a formal statement of the
Japanese government concerning the Nanking Massacre and you’ll see how
dishonest they are. They give three views, one of which is acceptable and the
others not. The third is an acceptable one. It goes:
(3) “We frankly
recognize the fact that, by colonization and invasion, Japan caused a great
deal of damage and inflicted pain on many countries, especially Asian nations
during one period of time in the past. We are determined to never again engage
in war and will move forward as a peaceful nation always keeping our feelings
of regret and remorse before us.”
This looks good but is
actually far from their real intentions. Let’s see the other two which show
their true feelings. One goes:
(1) We think it is
undeniable that after the occupation of
They did admit the
killings of innocent civilians, which is better than, Ishihara Shintaro, Mayor
of Tokyo’s total denial saying, “The Nanking Massacre is a lie made up by the
Chinese.” But you can see the Japanese government omitted comments on any
illegal killings of 90,000 disarmed Chinese soldiers.
And the other one
clearly shows that the Japanese government is running away from their own responsibility.
It goes:
(2) However, regarding the number of victims,
there are differing views and we think it is very hard to decide which
one is correct.
We all know that the
Japanese government is lying about the number here because it is supposed to
have accepted the number “over 300,000” back in 1951 in the San Francisco Peace
Treaty.
Let me show you two
important judgments that prove the authenticity of the number. There were two
war crimes tribunals that gave the death toll of the Nanking Massacre in their
judgments; The Nanking War Crimes Tribunal and The International Military
Tribunal for the
The Nanking
War Crimes Tribunal issued the following judgment on March 10th, 1947:
“The invading army, after occupying Nanking, spread into
various parts of Nanking city and staged large-scale massacres, collectively
killing and burning captive Chinese soldiers and civilians. The number of those
amounted to more than 190,000.
And those who were individually killed were recorded by charity organizations.
That number amounted to more than
150,000. The total number of victims was finalized as “over 300,000.”
(on page 875 of
“Nanking Massacre Part 1 & Part 2”, compiled by Professor Sun Zhai Wei孫宅魏http://Nankingforever.web.infoseek.co.jp/sontakugi.html)
They counted
340,000 bodies but they concluded as “over 300,000”. Now how about the other
one, the Tokyo Trials? It states;
The International Military Tribunal for the
“Estimates made at a later date
indicate that the total number of civilians and prisoners of war murdered in
These figures do not take into account those persons
whose bodies were destroyed by burning, or by throwing them into the
Here we have a difference of numbers. One gives “more
than 300,000” and the other “more than 200,000”. But we can see that the Tokyo
Trials give only part of the whole by its additional comments and is complemented
by the following deposition presented in 1954 by a former Japanese soldier Captain
Ohta Toshio who was in charge of disposing of dead bodies in
“The Headquarters of the
(See page 83, “The
Picture Collection of Nanking Massacre and International Rescue”, Chief Editor
Zhu ChenShan朱成山
(http://Nankingforever.web.infoseek.co.jp/part3-83.html)
Now we can see in order to get the whole picture of the
Chinese victims that we have to add “150,000” to
On top of that, as I said, the
Japanese government once accepted the following judgments in the San Francisco
Peace Treaty in 1951, which goes:
★ Evidence 4: San Francisco Peace
Treaty (September 8, 1951)
By Article 11 of the San Francisco Peace Treaty, Japan
accepted the judgments of the International Military Tribunal for the Far East and
of other Allied War Crimes Courts both within and outside Japan and
agreed to carry out the sentences imposed thereby upon Japanese nationals
imprisoned in Japan.
Now we can see that although