This topic describes memory limits for supported Windows releases:
- Memory and Address Space Limits
- Physical Memory Limits: Windows 7
- Physical Memory Limits: Windows Server 2008 R2
- Physical Memory Limits: Windows Server 2008
- Physical Memory Limits: Windows Vista
- Physical Memory Limits: Windows Home Server
- Physical Memory Limits: Windows Server 2003
- Physical Memory Limits: Windows XP
- Physical Memory Limits: Windows 2000
- Related Topics
Limits on memory and address space vary by platform, operating system, and by whether the IMAGE_FILE_LARGE_ADDRESS_AWARE value of the LOADED_IMAGE structure and 4-gigabyte tuning (4GT) are in use. IMAGE_FILE_LARGE_ADDRESS_AWARE is set or cleared by using the /LARGEADDRESSAWARE linker option.
Limits on physical memory for 32-bit platforms also depend on the Physical Address Extension (PAE), which allows 32-bit Windows systems to use more than 4 GB of physical memory.
Memory and Address Space Limits
The following table specifies the limits on memory and address space for supported releases of Windows. Unless otherwise noted, the limits in this table apply to all supported releases.
Memory type | Limit in 32-bit Windows | Limit in 64-bit Windows |
---|---|---|
User-mode virtual address space for each 32-bit process | 2 GB Up to 3 GB with IMAGE_FILE_LARGE_ADDRESS_AWARE and 4GT | 2 GB with IMAGE_FILE_LARGE_ADDRESS_AWARE cleared (default) 4 GB with IMAGE_FILE_LARGE_ADDRESS_AWARE set |
User-mode virtual address space for each 64-bit process | Not applicable | With IMAGE_FILE_LARGE_ADDRESS_AWARE set (default):
2 GB with IMAGE_FILE_LARGE_ADDRESS_AWARE cleared |
Kernel-mode virtual address space | 2 GB From 1 GB to a maximum of 2 GB with 4GT | 8 TB |
Paged pool | Limited by available kernel-mode virtual address space or the PagedPoolLimit registry key value.
| 128 GB
|
Nonpaged pool | Limited by available kernel-mode virtual address space, the NonPagedPoolLimit registry key value, or physical memory.
| 75% of RAM up to a maximum of 128 GB
|
System cache virtual address space (physical size limited only by physical memory) | Limited by available kernel-mode virtual address space or the SystemCacheLimit registry key value.
| Always 1 TB regardless of physical RAM
|
Physical Memory Limits: Windows 7
The following table specifies the limits on physical memory for Windows 7.
Version | Limit in 32-bit Windows | Limit in 64-bit Windows |
---|---|---|
Windows 7 Ultimate | 4 GB | 192 GB |
Windows 7 Enterprise | 4 GB | 192 GB |
Windows 7 Professional | 4 GB | 192 GB |
Windows 7 Home Premium | 4 GB | 16 GB |
Windows 7 Home Basic | 4 GB | 8 GB |
Windows 7 Starter | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Physical Memory Limits: Windows Server 2008 R2
The following table specifies the limits on physical memory for Windows Server 2008 R2. Windows Server 2008 R2 is available only in 64-bit editions.
Version | Limit in 64-bit Windows |
---|---|
Windows Server 2008 R2 Datacenter | 2 TB |
Windows Server 2008 R2 Enterprise | 2 TB |
Windows Server 2008��R2 for Itanium-Based Systems | 2 TB |
Windows Server 2008 R2 Foundation | 8 GB |
Windows Server 2008 R2 Standard | 32 GB |
Windows HPC Server 2008 R2 | 128 GB |
Windows Web Server 2008 R2 | 32 GB |
Physical Memory Limits: Windows Server 2008
The following table specifies the limits on physical memory for Windows Server 2008. Limits greater than 4 GB for 32-bit Windows assume that PAE is enabled.
Version | Limit in 32-bit Windows | Limit in 64-bit Windows |
---|---|---|
Windows Server 2008 Datacenter | 64 GB | 2 TB |
Windows Server 2008 Enterprise | 64 GB | 2 TB |
Windows Server 2008 HPC Edition | Not applicable | 128 GB |
Windows Server 2008 Standard | 4 GB | 32 GB |
Windows Server 2008 for Itanium-Based Systems | Not applicable | 2 TB |
Windows Small Business Server 2008 | 4 GB | 32 GB |
Windows Web Server 2008 | 4 GB | 32 GB |
Physical Memory Limits: Windows Vista
The following table specifies the limits on physical memory for Windows Vista.
Version | Limit in 32-bit Windows | Limit in 64-bit Windows |
---|---|---|
Windows Vista Ultimate | 4 GB | 128 GB |
Windows Vista Enterprise | 4 GB | 128 GB |
Windows Vista Business | 4 GB | 128 GB |
Windows Vista Home Premium | 4 GB | 16 GB |
Windows Vista Home Basic | 4 GB | 8 GB |
Windows Vista Starter | 1 GB | Not applicable |
Physical Memory Limits: Windows Home Server
Windows Home Server is available only in a 32-bit edition. The physical memory limit is 4 GB.
Physical Memory Limits: Windows Server 2003
The following table specifies the limits on physical memory for Windows Server 2003. Limits over 4 GB for 32-bit Windows assume that PAE is enabled.
Version | Limit in 32-bit Windows | Limit in 64-bit Windows |
---|---|---|
Windows Server 2003 with Service Pack 2 (SP2), Datacenter Edition | 128 GB 64 GB with 4GT | IA64 2 TB X64 1 TB |
Windows Server 2003 with Service Pack 2 (SP2), Enterprise Edition | 64 GB | IA64 2 TB X64 1 TB |
Windows Storage Server 2003, Enterprise Edition | 8 GB | Not applicable |
Windows Storage Server 2003 | 4 GB | Not applicable |
Windows Server 2003 R2 Datacenter Edition Windows Server 2003 with Service Pack 1 (SP1), Datacenter Edition | 128 GB 16 GB with 4GT | 1 TB |
Windows Server 2003 R2 Enterprise Edition Windows Server 2003 with Service Pack 1 (SP1), Enterprise Edition | 64 GB 16 GB with 4GT | 1 TB |
Windows Server 2003 R2 Standard Edition Windows Server 2003, Standard Edition SP1 Windows Server 2003, Standard Edition SP2 | 4 GB | 32 GB |
Windows Server 2003, Datacenter Edition | 128 GB 16 GB with 4GT | 512 GB |
Windows Server 2003, Enterprise Edition | 32 GB 16 GB with 4GT | 64 GB |
Windows Server 2003, Standard Edition | 4 GB | 16 GB |
Windows Server 2003, Web Edition | 2 GB | Not applicable |
Windows Small Business Server 2003 | 4 GB | Not applicable |
Windows Compute Cluster Server 2003 | Not applicable | 32 GB |
Physical Memory Limits: Windows XP
The following table specifies the limits on physical memory for Windows XP.
Version | Limit in 32-bit Windows | Limit in 64-bit Windows |
---|---|---|
Windows XP | 4 GB | 128 GB |
Windows XP Starter Edition | 512 MB | Not applicable |
Physical Memory Limits: Windows 2000
The following table specifies the limits on physical memory for Windows 2000.
Version | Limit in 32-bit Windows |
---|---|
Windows 2000 Professional | 4 GB |
Windows 2000 Server | 4 GB |
Windows 2000 Advanced Server | 8 GB |
Windows 2000 Datacenter Server | 32 GB |
Related Topics
Send comments about this topic to Microsoft
Build date: 7/1/2010
- 4/7/2010
- Joshua25640735
- 7/10/2010
- aaaRdDiann
- A 32 bit OS can only use 4GB of memory total, that means if you have 4GB of ram and your graphic card has 1GB of ram, you have a total of 5GB of memory.
- Out of that 5GB of memory, you can only use 4GB total. 1GB the graphic card will take up, so now the 32bit OS can only use 3GB.
- Enabling PAE, will limit to the OS to 2GB total. What PAE does is dedicate 2GB to OS and the other 2GB to anything other then the OS. Apparently some people don't understand how PAE works and think that some how it can magically make a 32bit XP use more then 4GB, which is impossible, so after noticing my explanation is not getting through, I thought a visual from MS itself might help sink it in, you can see it here: http://www.microsoft.com/whdc/system/platform/server/PAE/PAEdrv.mspx
- The 'fact' above is the perfect example of this misunderstanding. PAE has nothing to do with the user and kernel pool being seperated.
- Many confuse virtual memory with physical memory. All requests for memory by applications; that is running processes, such as explorer.exe, wmplayer.exe, dwm.exe, iexplore.exe, etc; are furfilled using virtual memory. Virtual memory is just an abstraction which includes physical memory and your pagefile(s). Yes, virtual memory includes physical memory!
- Vista 32bit can see only 3.5GB of ram total. The new sp1 only reports how much memory you have intalled, not how much memory you can use.
Why is that important? the last word, really. 'Extension'. this does NOT enable you to use more than 4GB ram. Face facts people. This is a form of some memory management features,
more than anything else. This isn't even a 'Microsoft thing'. it's a 32-bit computing limitation. the 'Microsoft thing' part comes in because they've somehow given people
the idea that using this boot flag can somehow magically let your computer address more ram than any 32-bit OS is capable of.
I blame their marketing department. Stupid buggers.
And yes, there's a page on microsoft that DOES say that it allows you to use more than 4GB ram. THAT's where people got this idea.
If you want and bought more than 4GB of ram. suck it up and get a real 64-bit OS already.
You could afford the RAM, so go do it. If it's the cost of windows 64-bit that's stopping you,
go download the 64-bit version of ubuntu or something it's free. And if you hate MS, you should want to do that anyway.
But above all, quit ranting. MS isn't going to 'fix' anything because the users rant. This should be painfully obvious to us all by now.
I mean jesus, just look at IIS if you hope that they will one day 'fix' thier OS....
- 4/17/2010
- EOCP
- 6/16/2010
- Dimension Evil
- 6/16/2010
- Dimension Evil
- 6/16/2010
- Dimension Evil
[Edit: the 8086 had a 20 bit address bus or 1GB addressable RAM limit, but the later 80x86 families could address up to 32 bits in different modes. However the 8086 CPU was always 16bit. Debate also raged at the time over whether the 80x86 families were 16, 20, 24 or 32 bit processors. But the 1Gb 8086 vs 640K MSDOS stupid limit became infamous when Bill Gates stupidly asked in defence of his stupidity "Who needs more than 640K of memory?" (DSR)]
Opinion. The reason x32 Windows will not recognize anything past that is probably market based. 64bit processors came out a couple years after Windows XP. The first true (no I don't consider XP pro x64 version a true 64bit operating system) 64bit operating system to come from MS was Vista. Everyone knows how well that went. People were downgrading, or doing anything they could to stay away from that mess. Businesses couldn't initially justify the cost of the machines to run Vista acceptably amongst other things (reverse compatibility in hardware and software, reliability issues, hardware support, ect) as indicated by Vista's paltry 18% market share at the launch of 7. In order to sell more copies of Vista and throw some business down their partners way they came up with some pretty lame (IMO) excuses to get people to buy new stuff. Thanks to Vistas horrendous overhead the price of memory has dropped creating this little conundrum.
And while I have my opinions as to why Vista was such a train wreck. It has definitely become more refined over time. Windows 7 is hands down, again in my own opinion, the best OS Microsoft has launched to date. And there are definite advantages to 64bit processing. A majority of the software is still written for 32 bit processing negating most of the advantage you would get with using a 64bit operating system. Besides, doesn't seem to matter which computer or what Microsoft OS I jump onto. The closer I get to utilizing 2 gig of RAM, the crappier the computer seems to run. Kind of like a glass wall there.
- 3/27/2010
- rvndmnmt
- 3/29/2010
- Display Name_1
The above link describes how to set up PAE (Physical Address Extension) on Vista 32 bits (It can be done in other 32 bits Windows), so that it can make use of 4GB RAM, not just ~3.5GB.
To authors of this message: Please, read how PAE works.
- 10/6/2008
- Angelo D_Elia
- 3/19/2010
- daverum
- 2/1/2010
- Thomas_Foolery
so i wwork with cubase 5 64 bit version on win 7 ulimate 64 bit. no let say i add a kontakt (sampler) 32 bit. cubase 5 is then a host for this konakt. so my question is since it says per process, does kontakt have 4 gb ram and cubase has another 4 gb of ram? or how do i have to understand this per process?
thank you
- 1/22/2010
- notsoluckyluke
http://blogs.sepago.de/helge/2008/01/23/windows-x64-all-the-same-yet-very-different-part-2/
http://blogs.sepago.de/helge/2008/05/25/x64-my-terminal-servers-run-just-fine-with-32-bits-and-81216-gb-ram/
- 8/20/2009
- Helge Klein
If talking only by design、 even XP x64 can treats 32TB.
2 socket hardware, such as Opteron 2000 number processor platform had maximum memory 128GB.
Microsoft says support that only what it was possible to prove.
And now, Xeon 5500 number processor platform can support maximum up to 144GB.
Microsoft will do the proof examination of 144GB in the near future.
- 7/24/2009
- GreenCat
- 6/24/2009
- fabulous Fab
"Apparently some people don't understand how PAE works and think that
some how it can magically make a 32bit XP use more then 4GB, which is
impossible, so after noticing my explanation is not getting through, I
thought a visual from MS itself might help sink it in, you can see it
here:
http://www.microsoft.com/whdc/system/platform/server/PAE/PAEdrv.mspx"
I also mistakenly thought a 32bit operating system could only use 4GB, having only 32 address bits to work with. But as you can see from the tables above, 32bit Windows Server 2008 can use up to 64GB of physical memory. Turning on the PAE feature modifies the virtual address mapping used by the processor hardware. There is a good explanation on Wikipedia:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Physical_Address_Extension
Very basically, each process is still limited to 4GB because of the 32bit addresses, but the OS can use a processor control register to map that 4GB space above the 4GB. So process "A" might have it's 4GB virtual address space start in physical ram at 8GB, process "B" at 12GB, etc.
Many people will doubt this because of their personal experience with Microsoft 32bit desktop operating systems. Microsoft has specifically limited the desktops to 4GB for driver compatibility reasons.
Correction, read my facts again and you will see I specifically said "XP 32 bit", second I point to ms's own site and you take us to wiki which anybody can edit? since when is wiki's info more reliable then ms's own site when we discussing ms's OS? lol
In short XP 32-bit can't see more then 4GB of ram total no matter what you do, and its clearly stated here by MS:http://www.microsoft.com/whdc/system/platform/server/PAE/PAEdrv.mspx
yes other 32-bit OS-es can use more then 4GB of ram but not XP 32-bit
"I running windwos Vista 64-bit with 8-GB of ram. Most of my applications are 32-bit applications. How much RAM can VISTA dedicates to 32-bit application?"
64 bit editions of Windows can only attribute a total of 4 GiB of RAM to any single 32 bit virtual memory instance (or application), regardless of your total RAM. The reason is simple, 64 bit editions of Desktop Windows run on the x86-64 architecture, which is a processor architecture capable of running both 64 and 32 bit instructions, limiting 32 bit instructions (or applications) to what 32 bit limits them to, thus, 4 GiB of RAM.
Intel and AMD's specification of PAE does support the x86-64 architecture but the software layer of Microsoft's PAE (the API), called AWE, is not supported on 64 bit editions of Windows, so Windows Vista 64 bit cannot attribute more than 4 GiB of RAM for a 32 bit application.
In fact, true 64 bit architectures like the Intel Itanium processor do not support 32 bit applications. The only reason 32 bit applications work on 64 bit editions of desktop Windows is because the very architecture at its core, called x86-64 (often erroneously shortened to x64), is a hybrid architecture capable of running both 32 bit and 64 bit instructions.
It's also the reason why drivers may not work in 32 bit, but applications will, on Windows Vista 64 bit. The Windows Vista 64 bit kernel is written in 64 bit, and thus, drivers must also be written in 64 bit. If Microsoft would have made the kernel in 32 bit, expanded support would have had to rely on PAE, but drivers wouldn't have had to be re-written. In fact, Apple used that strategy with Mac OS X's transition to 64 bit processors and only its future Snow Leopard will have its kernel in 64 bit.
"I also mistakenly thought a 32bit operating system could only use 4GB, having only 32 address bits to work with. But as you can see from the tables above, 32bit Windows Server 2008 can use up to 64GB of physical memory."
Note however that Windows Server 2008 32 bit uses PAE to achieve this.
"The limit for 64-bit XP is given as 128 GB, while on the support site, http://support.microsoft.com/kb/283247/en-us, it is given as 16 GB!
What is correct, 16 GB or 128 GB?"
Short answer is 128 GiB of RAM.
While Windows XP Pro 64 bit can theoretically support 128 GiB of RAM, driver issues, lack of motherboard support and PAE's Intel technical spec limit to 64 GiB can limit this. Very few 32 bit systems will be built to handle 128 GiB of RAM as the use of a 64 bit operating system becomes much more advantageous in this situation.
I have an article on my blog, Pacoup.com, but you'll have to find it yourself as I cannot link to my own articles on MSDN.
WROTE:
XP and Vista can only truly manage ~3GB of Physical RAM. 4GB is misleading.
Quote:
Xp and Vista can truly manage ~4GB of physical RAM, but shows only the "available" ram. If you have a onboard vídeo with 512mb and something else on-board to complete 1gb, your manager will show only 3GB "available".
QUOTE: PP
Xp and Vista can truly manage ~4GB of physical RAM
- 8/24/2008
- DNoonon
- 5/6/2009
- Thomas Lee
That said, most of the memory limits make sound sense.
- 6/19/2008
- robitpro
- 5/6/2009
- Thomas Lee
cs
The limit for 64-bit XP is given as 128 GB, while on the support site, http://support.microsoft.com/kb/283247/en-us, it is given as 16 GB!
What is correct, 16 GB or 128 GB?
Some customers have been reported problems with running 64-bit XP on 32 GB RAM. Can you clarify if 32 Gb RAM is supported and if so, what was the purpose of information in KB 283247
- 11/3/2008
- eezvmt