| 
      参考NJアドルフ・ヒットラーとナチスは、ロスチャイルドにより作られ、資金援助されてきた。
 ADOLF HITLER AND THE NAZIS WERE CREATED AND FUNDED BY THE ROTHSCHILDS.
 Talmudic Judaism: The Dark Truth 11. WAS HITLER A ROTHSCHILD? by David 
      Icke
 http://www.nccg.org/ezion_geber/judaism4.html
 
 Of course, the strength of feeling that fans the flames of condemnation 
      against anyone dubbed "anti-semitic" today is the sickening persecution of 
      Jewish people by the Nazis of Adolf Hitler. To expose or question the 
      actions of the Rothschilds or any other Jewish person or organisation is 
      to be called a "nazi" and "anti-semitic", that all-encompassing label 
      which has discredited so many researchers and stopped them having the 
      opportunity to speak in public because of protest by unthinking robot 
      radicals and the refusal of venues to host their meetings. I have had this 
      from time to time, not least in eastern Canada thanks to a campaign by 
      B'nai B'rith and the Anti-Defamation League (which spends it's entire time 
      trying to defame people). Both organisations, I repeat, are Rothschild 
      created and controlled.
 
 How strange then, that as I have documented in And The Truth Shall Set You 
      Free and The Biggest Secret, along with endless other researchers and 
      scholars, Adolf Hitler and the Nazis were created and funded by the 
      Rothschilds. It was they who arranged for Hitler to come to power through 
      the Illuminati secret societies in Germany like the Thule Society and the 
      Vril Society which they created through their German networks; it was the 
      Rothschilds who funded Hitler through the Bank of England and other 
      British and American sources like the Rothschild's Kuhn, Loeb, bank which 
      also funded the Russian Revolution.
 
 The very heart of Hitler's war machine was the chemical giant, I.G. 
      Farben, which had an American arm that was controlled by the Rothschilds 
      through their lackeys, the Warburgs. Paul Warburg, who manipulated into 
      existence the privately-owned "central bank" of America, the Federal 
      Reserve, in 1913, was on the board of American I.G. Indeed Hitler's I.G. 
      Farben, which ran the slave labour camp at Auchwitz, was, in reality, a 
      division of Standard Oil, officially owned by the Rockefellers, but in 
      truth the Rockefeller empire was funded into existence by the Rothschilds.
 
 See And The Truth Shall Set You Free and The Biggest Secret for the 
      detailed background of this and other aspects of this story. The 
      Rothschilds also owned the German news agencies during both World Wars and 
      thus controlled the flow of "information" to Germans and the outside 
      world. Incidentally, when Allied troops entered Germany they found that 
      the I.G. Farben factories, the very core of Hitler's war operation, had 
      not been hit by the mass bombing and neither had Ford factories - another 
      Illuminati supporter of Hitler. Other factories nearby had been demolished 
      by bombing raids.
 | 
    
      | 
      
      参考CI駐日イスラエル大使館も600万人と言っているわけですが、そうなると、どう考えても計算が合わないんですが。要するに、ホロコーストは嘘だらけ。こうなってくると、当然、ガス室もアンネの日記も眉に唾をたっぷりつけて聞かないといけない話ってことですね。
 http://tokyo.mfa.gov.il/mfm/web/main/document.asp?DocumentID=49398&MissionID=43
 この戦争中の6年間で、ナチに殺されたユダヤ人はおよそ600万人、当時のユダヤ人口の約三分の一にのぼります。そのうち150万人は子供たちでした。背筋の凍るような効率性を以って実行されたこのユダヤ人絶滅計画は、単なる大量殺薮以上のものでした。それは規模・運営・履行手段において他に類を見ないが故に、ホロコーストという独白の名称を冠されているのです。
 参考HK
 ■なるほど、ナチスは「ヨーロッパのユダヤ人を600万人もガス室に送り込んで虐殺した」というのですね?たしかに、権威あるエルサレムのホロコースト(ユダヤ人大量虐殺)記念館「ヤド・バシェム」も、「600万人」と言っているから、ユダヤの公式見解と見ていいのでしょう。
 犠牲者のデータベース公開 ホロコースト記念館
 http://headlines.yahoo.co.jp/hl?a=20041129-00000111-kyodo-int
 【エルサレム29日共同】エルサレムのホロコースト(ユダヤ人大量虐殺)記念館「ヤド・バシェム」はこのほど、犠牲者のうち約300万人の横顔や経歴を集めたデータベースをインターネットで公開した。ホロコーストの犠牲者は推定約600万人。データベース公開を機に、記録が残っていない犠牲者や、経歴が分からない犠牲者についての情報提供を世界中のユダヤ人らに呼び掛ける。当時を知る人々の高齢化が進んでいるため、記念館は今回が「最後のチャンス」とみている。データベースは名前や出生地などから犠牲者の経歴を検索できる。「アンネの日記」で知られるアンネ・フランクの名もあり、生年月日や出生地、死亡した年、場所、両親の名前などが一覧できる。広報担当者は、ユダヤ人でなく直接ホロコーストと関係のない人も、犠牲者一人ひとりの人生を知ることでホロコーストという未曽有の歴史的悲劇を学ぶよい機会になるとしている。
 (共同通信) - 11月29日
 
 参考EF
 WAS THERE REALLY A HOLOCAUST ?
 By Dr. Edward.R. Fields
 http://www.stormfront.org/truth_at_last/holocaust.htm
 "Since the Second World War, Jews have been treated with silk gloves. 
      Without Auschwitz, there would be no Israel."
 
 - by Nathan Goldmann, the Founder of Israel as quoted from Paris Match, 
      December 29, 1979
 
 The "Holocaust" has given Israel a tremendous psychological advantage over 
      the Gentile world, particularly America and Germany. By exploiting the 
      guilt complex instilled in non-Jews, they have obtained:
 
 Over $65 billion in aid from Germany.
 Over $55 billion in aid from America. Israel, a prosperous country, 
      receives $3.2 billion, (or $8 million a day) in foreign aid - more than 
      any other country.
 The 45,000 Jewish immigrants from Russia have the highest annual quota 
      after Mexico. They enter as "refugees" without having to prove 
      persecution! As "refugees" they are automatically entitled to full welfare 
      benefits not subject to welfare reform cuts.
 Nonstop holocaust brainwashing in schools, TV, movies and books has placed 
      Israel and organized Jewry above criticism! How Many Jews Actually Died?
 
 The World Almanac for 1947, in quoting figures supplies by the American 
      Jewish Committee states that the world Jewish population in 1939 was 
      15,688,259. The New York Times of February 22, 1948, stated that the world 
      Jewish population ranged from 15,600,000 to 18,700,000, excluding some 
      600,000 to 700,000 living in Palestine. How could the Jewish population 
      have increased so rapidly after losing six million during World War II? 
      Walter Sanning, the author of Dissolution of European Jewry, says that no 
      less than 2,200,000 Jews had emigrated out of Europe leaving 2,847,000 
      Jews residing there at the height of the German occupation in June 1941. 
      After the war, 3,375,000 Jews, according to the Red Cross, applied for 
      holocaust reparations. This figure included many of the emigrants. Thus, 
      the actual number of those who died at the camps from all causes ranges 
      between 150,000 and 300,000.
 | 
    
      | 参考RF:World Famous French Professor Says From All His Research Nazi Homicidal 
      Gas Chambers Did Not Exist
 Dr. Robert Faurisson
 http://www.ihr.org/other/authorbios.html
 7-18-4
 
 Robert Faurisson is Europe's leading Holocaust revisionist scholar. He was 
      educated at the Paris Sorbonne, and served as associate professor at the 
      University of Lyon in France from 1974 until 1990. He is a recognized 
      specialist of text and document analysis. After years of private research 
      and study, Dr. Faurisson first made public his skeptical views about the 
      Holocaust extermination story in articles published in 1978 in the French 
      daily Le Monde. His writings on the Holocaust issue have appeared in two 
      books and numerous scholarly articles, many of which have been published 
      in the IHR's Journal of Historical Review.
 
 From Dust Jacket Piece (May 2004)
 
 Dr. Robert Faurisson has concluded from his research that the alleged 
      Hitlerite gas chambers and the alleged genocide of the Jews form one and 
      the same historical lie, which has made possible a gigantic 
      political-financial swindle whose main beneficiaries are the State of 
      Israel and international Zionism and whose main victims are the German 
      people - but not their leaders - and the Palestinian people in their 
      entirety.
 
 He has demonstrated that, for physical and chemical reasons, the alleged 
      Hitlerite gas chambers could not have existed. He has emphasised that the 
      Germans had wanted not to exterminate the Jews but to expel them from 
      Europe towards a Jewish national home elsewhere than in Palestine; that 
      was what they called "the final solution to the Jewish question" (die 
      territoriale Endlösung der Judenfrage).
 
 Many European Jews, civilians or soldiers, died as a result of wartime 
      actions and notably in the typhus epidemics, but many Jews survived and, 
      in their millions, dispersed throughout the world, going so far as to 
      create and people a new State, that of Israel.
 
 Recently R. Faurisson has written that Adolf Hitler's weapons of mass 
      destruction (gas chambers and gas vans) existed no more at that time than 
      do those of Saddam Hussein today. The first lie received official 
      endorsement in November 1944 from an agency called the War Refugee Board, 
      created by president Roosevelt at the instigation of Henry Morgenthau, 
      Junior. The second lie was launched by another Washington agency, the 
      Office of Special Plans, which president Bush Junior created in 2002 at 
      the instigation of Paul Wolfowitz. The world is witness, at nearly sixty 
      years' distance, to the same type of lie and the same type of liars.
 
 Born in 1929 of a French father and a Scottish mother, R. Faurisson holds 
      the agrégation des lettres (highest competitive examination) and a 
      doctorate in "literature and the social sciences". He was professor at the 
      University of Lyon-II where, in particular, he taught the "criticism of 
      texts and documents (literature, history, media)". Divested of his chair 
      by an unexplained ministerial ruling, he has suffered numerous physical 
      assaults and incurred many convictions in the French courts for disputing 
      the myth of the "Holocaust". He has published seven works: three of 
      literary revisionism and four of historical revisionism. His four volumes 
      of Écrits révisionnistes (1974-1998) bring together in more than two 
      thousand pages articles, studies and critical revisions of texts in which 
      the upholders of an official history, increasingly religious and 
      repressive in character, are seen to yield step by step, on the plane of 
      reason, before the arguments and discoveries of historical revisionism 
      initiated, in France, by Paul Rassinier, author of Le Mensonge d'Ulysse 
      (1950).
 
           
        **** Foreword (May 2004)     
        The first edition of the present work dates from 
        March 1999. I was indebted for its production to Serge Thion and his 
        lady friend, who had been willing to compile, with a view to 
        publication, articles and studies which, in addition to some books or 
        other revisionist writings, I had drafted between 1974 and 1998. The 
        present edition reproduces the contents of the first but not without 
        abundant corrections of detail. I owe this revised and corrected edition 
        to Jean Plantin and, especially, to Yvonne Schleiter. The index of names 
        has been reworked. In the absence of an index of subjects, there is a 
        "reader's guide" which I owe to Jean-Marie Boisdefeu. This second 
        edition was supposed to appear in 2001 but we have until now been 
        constantly forced to postpone it. I had promised in addition to these 
        four volumes a volume of illustrations; I regret not being able to keep 
        that promise all the more as my work, essentially concrete, would have 
        benefited from the accompaniment of documents and photographs of which, 
        moreover, I possess a great number.     
        On 2 February of this year, I devoted an article to 
        my "Sombre Appraisal of Historical Revisionism". Since that date, the 
        situation has worsened. The conference that was to have assembled more 
        than two hundred sympathisers of the revisionist cause on the 24th and 
        25th of April in Sacramento, the capital of California, was cancelled 
        and, in Toronto, the worst is to be feared for Ernst Zündel, who has 
        been kept languishing for fifteen months in solitary confinement without 
        charge. His cruel detention has recently been endorsed by a superior 
        court in its refusal to issue a writ of habeas corpus.     
        Today, those active in revisionist research or 
        diffusion are very few. We may cite mainly Walter Mueller, Ingrid 
        Rimland, Germar Rudolf (helped by his friend Jürgen Graf in Russia), 
        Michael Santomauro and Bradley Smith in the United States, Heinz Koppe 
        in Canada, Fredrick Toben in Australia, Carlo Mattogno in Italy, Jean 
        Plantin in France, Vincent Reynouard in Belgium, Ahmed Rami and Serge 
        Thion on the Internet.     
        On the scientific plane, revisionism has achieved 
        total victory. It no longer has a single adversary. The Hilbergs, the 
        Vidal-Naquets, the Klarsfelds, the Berenbaums, the Deborah Lipstadts and 
        one van Pelt, happy with repeating as his own the flimsy arguments of 
        one Jean-Claude Pressac, have been reduced to nothing. The revisionists 
        find themselves opposed only by Spielberg-style films, Yad Vashem 
        ceremonies, Disneyland-inspired museums, pilgrimages to Auschwitz, 
        continuous media ballyhoo, brainwashing at school and at university and, 
        finally, a State propaganda buttressed by legislative repression. Our 
        foes have bowed to our strength in the field but practically no one 
        knows it, for the losers, what with their power in the mass media and 
        their virtuoso bluffing, go on blowing their trumpets or shofars as if 
        they had won the battle.     
        Their historians claimed that Hitler had carried out 
        a policy of extermination against the Jews, notably using weapons of 
        mass destruction called execution gas chambers or gas vans. Besides, 
        they assured us that, on the Eastern front, the Einsatzgruppen had 
        indulged in gigantic massacres of Jews. In sum, they would have us 
        believe that nearly the entire community of Jews in Europe had thus been 
        exterminated.     
        Such a vast crime would have presupposed an order 
        from on high, a project, a plan, overall directives, comprehensive 
        instructions, financing, checks of operations and expenditures, a 
        multitude of specific or general assessments, research into and 
        development of weapons the like of which humanity had never known, along 
        with the involvement of large numbers of military men, scientists, 
        engineers, labourers and employees. An undertaking of the sort, 
        especially if conducted in tightest secrecy, would also have called for 
        an array of draconian measures. The whole project would have left 
        numerous pieces of irrefutable evidence, both material and documentary.
        
           
        At first, the official historians had the nerve to 
        assert that such evidence indeed existed, and "in abundance". But to the 
        challenge to produce "one bit of proof, just one" of their choosing, 
        they beat a retreat and since then, following the example of J.-C. 
        Pressac, have invoked only the existence of "criminal traces" or 
        "beginnings of proof". Pursuing their withdrawal still further, they 
        have invented an account telling that the great massacre happened 
        without an order, without a directive, spontaneously (like "spontaneous 
        generation", in a way). The most prestigious of them, Raul Hilberg, 
        falling back from his original affirmation that there had been two 
        orders from the Führer to kill the Jews, has been reduced to maintaining 
        that in fact it all came about without an order, without a plan, and 
        only thanks to "an incredible meeting of minds" within the vast German 
        bureaucracy, and by "a consensus mind-reading" amongst Nazi bureaucrats!
        
           
        No one has been able to find any premises that might 
        have been a genuine execution gas chamber. Nor a single execution gas 
        van. In respect to the greatest crime in the world the accusation cannot 
        provide any forensic study of the crime weapon. Amongst the post-mortems 
        there is not one that establishes gassing as the cause of death. Those 
        alleged witnesses to "gassings" who have been put under precise 
        cross-examination in public court proceedings have been unmasked. The 
        "execution gas chambers" shown to tourists have revealed themselves to 
        be Potemkin village contrivances. The massacres imputed to the 
        Einsatzgruppen have left behind no common burial sites approaching the 
        mass graves of the Katyn forest slaughter (4,255 corpses counted), an 
        acknowledged crime whose perpetrators were our very own Soviet allies.
        
           
        On the other hand, there is no lack of facts to prove 
        that the 3rd Reich never had a policy of physical extermination of the 
        Jews. Even on the Eastern front, the killing of an innocent Jewish 
        civilian was punishable by heavy sanctions, including the death penalty. 
        Those soldiers who engaged in any form of excess with regard to Jews 
        were liable to sentence by a German court martial. There are countless 
        examples of measures taken, even in the camps, for the protection of the 
        Jews against the excesses inherent to all forms of detention, as well as 
        against the ravages caused by the epidemics.     
        The Germans had an obsessive fear of disorder, of 
        contagion, of the loss of manpower; even at Auschwitz there were 
        training centres for young Jews to learn various manual trades.     
        Millions of Jews survived the war, in spite of the 
        great carnage throughout Europe at the time, and in spite of the 
        apocalypse of a Germany pulverised by the Allied bombardments. Calling 
        themselves "survivors" or "miraculous escapees", many still today make 
        up the membership of organisations craving financial reparations. Now, 
        fifty-nine years after the war, the number of these "survivors" has 
        recently been estimated at 687,900 (the figure given by New York based 
        demographer Jacob Ukeles, cited in the article by Amiran Barkat "US 
        Court to discuss question of who is a Holocaust survivor", Haaretz, 18 
        April 2004).     
        During the war, Jewish leaders uttered alarming words 
        about an extermination of the Jews, but their conduct showed that they 
        did not really believe in it. The Allied governments saw that they were 
        dealing with "Jews trying to stoke us up". And then, the "brown Jews" of 
        the "international Jewish collaboration" were not wanting. Zionists and 
        National-Socialists shared, to a certain degree, a particular worldview; 
        hence, in 1941, the Stern Group's offer of military collaboration with 
        Germany against the British. As late as 21 April 1945 a member of the 
        World Jewish Congress, Norbert Masur, was received by Himmler to discuss 
        the matter of Jews to be delivered to the Allies.     
        The Germans sought to expel the Jews from Europe, if 
        possible with the accord of the rest of the world. They had in mind a 
        "territorial final solution of the Jewish question" ("eine territoriale 
        Endlösung der Judenfrage", as written in a foreign ministry memorandum 
        of 21 August 1942 bearing the signature of an official called Martin 
        Luther).     
        In France on 6 March 2004, during Thierry Ardisson's 
        television discussion programme "Tout le monde en parle" ("Everyone's 
        talking about it"), admiral Philippe de Gaulle was heard to state, 
        regarding the Jews: "The Germans wanted, if not to exterminate them, at 
        least to get them out [of Europe]". That reflection, hardly lacking in 
        soundness, met only with silence in the media. Also h idden from the 
        general public is the fact that neither Churchill, nor Eden, nor 
        Roosevelt, nor Truman, nor Eisenhower, nor de Gaulle, nor Stalin ever 
        cared to mention the "gas chambers" or the "gas vans".
            
        Those amongst them who, years after the conflict had 
        ended, wrote their wartime memoirs also persisted in keeping quiet on 
        the subject, as did Pius XII, although he was yet more hostile to Hitler 
        than to Stalin (see Robert Faurisson, Le Révisionnisme de Pie XII, 2003, 
        120 p.). Adolf Hitler's "weapons of mass destruction", his alleged 
        execution gas chambers and gas vans, existed no more than the "weapons 
        of mass destruction" of Saddam Hussein. In the two instances the lie and 
        the liars have been of identical origin: in 1944, under the aegis of 
        Franklin Roosevelt, the War Refugee Board spawned by Henry Morgenthau Jr 
        and, in 2002, under the aegis of George Bush Jr, the Office of Special 
        Plans spawned by Paul Wolfowitz.     
        Unhappily, today, intoxicated by holocaustic 
        propaganda, people are not of a mind to call their beliefs into 
        question. The "Shoah" has become a religious superstition inspiring 
        reverence or fear. Conscious both of its own fragility and of the 
        precarious standing of the State of Israel, of which it is the sword and 
        the shield, this religion has erected daunting walls of defence, and 
        harshly suppresses any who seek to stand up to it. In the past, it took 
        courage and sacrifices to be a truly active revisionist; to remain one 
        in future will require the heroism of Antigone and an uncommon 
        self-abnegation.     
        Professor F. Littell has said: "You can't discuss the 
        truth of the holocaust. That is a distortion of the concept of free 
        speech. The United States should emulate West Germany, which outlaws 
        such exercises."     
        -- Mind-boggling! Don't you think?
            
        http://64.143.9.197/jhr/v11/v11p365_Bennett.html
            
        
        http://www.RePortersNoteBook.com
 参考SK
 これがガス室の隣にある遺体焼却場の焼却炉。 
        写真は二機が並んでいるのだが、こんな感じのがあと二つほどあった。一回に六体を処理できるが、これで毎日2000体も焼却って可能なんだろうか? と思わずにはいられない。
 http://members.tripod.com/kozou/porland/
 
 そのとおりです。一日2千体なんて処理できるわけがない。病気で死んだ収容者の「火葬」に使っただけの話でしょう。ガス室なんかなかった。
 |