Penis Sans Foreskin - The Preferred Way to Prepare A Penis?
This post is dedicated to my wife since, if she has to see penises, she’d prefer them to be circumcised. Of course, I have to tease her. But this does bring up a question which I’ll pose here. Is there a general female preference for circumcised penises?
Every girl I have talked to about this has preferred circumcised, with the reactions ranging from slight aesthetic preferences to being repulsed by foreskin. My wife comes from a part of the world where circumcision is much less common than in the U.S.. Despite coming from a culture not used to circumcision, as I stated earlier, she prefers it.
This reminds me of Playgirl’s launch in Russia several years ago. One of the most noteworthy things about the event was the buzz that many of the women would be seeing circumcised dicks for the first time. In fact, since Playgirl was founded to be “entertainment for women” and, when it more specifically catered to the heterosexual female demographic in its earlier days, the dicks featured on its pages were almost exclusively circumcised. It was only later, when the magazine began embracing its gay male readers, that foreskins started appearing more regularly.
So, do the majority of women prefer circumcised penis over the intact ones? Maybe we’ll get some female insight in the comments, just below the bunch of foreskin pictures to inspire them, whether they inspire affection or repulsion, we’ll have to wait and see.
6 Comments
April 7, 2010 at 7:54 pm
I grew up and live in the US (Texas) and was in my early twenties before I saw my first uncut dick… but I fell in love with it instantly. Once I stopped laughing and thinking of the “peek-a-boo” games I could play with it, that is. Visually, uncut is so much more appealing – it looks less “distressed”, and there’s just more to it. I realize there are some hygiene aspects to consider, but if your man isn’t washing down there, then chances are there’s a lot of other places he doesn’t wash, so it wouldn’t matter whether he was cut or not. He’d still be dirty….
April 8, 2010 at 5:41 am
uncut FTW
i personally don’t like uncut dicks with visible scars…
April 8, 2010 at 8:20 am
the second picture is not a penis, that’s an elephants trunk! there’s a lot of pictures with excessive or tight foreskins which i’ve never seen before.
April 8, 2010 at 10:29 am
Gawd NO! I love uncut dicks – the more options for play the better. And seeing the head of an erect penis just peeking out…yum! I always feel kinda bad for guys who are circumcised – it always looks a little painful, and I know they are missing out on sensation
April 10, 2010 at 2:56 pm
Looks-wise… cut is better. The only thing I prefer uncut for is hand jobs. More fun and no lotion.
April 12, 2010 at 12:24 pm
I prefer intact males, for a couple of reasons.
One, it is the way a man is meant to be, and if I want someone to accept me as I am, without surgical alteration, I will extend the same courtesy. I wouldn’t want anyone cutting my “excess genital skin” away just because my partner will find it more aesthetically pleasing or my parents will find it easier to keep me clean when I’m an infant, so why would I want that done to a male?
Two, intact males are MUCH more responsive than cut males. The skin surrounding the tip of the cock is as sensitive as the hood of a woman’s clitoris — and I know this from personal experience. Tongue an intact male the same way you would a woman and you’ll get the same gasps and jolts and moans.
Women complain about the unnatural cosmetic standards we are held to — but so many of us don’t even think twice about snipping skin off our baby boys because we think they’ll look prettier that way. It is the height of cruelty and hypocrisy.