• On BNET: 8 ways to screw up with social media
March 3, 2010 2:36 PM PST

Google admits its SEO could use a little work

by Josh Lowensohn
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 8 comments

Google has published a detailed, 49-page report that rates the search engine optimization (SEO) on its various properties including the Google search home page. The result? It's failing in a number of categories.

On the bright side, the company says it plans to use this information to better its own SEO, and that to help others, the company has shared some of the metrics it's used.

The report covers 100 of Google's products. The company is also planning a follow-up that will cover international localizations.

Among the items under scrutiny, one of the biggest areas of failure for the company is in "search result presentation," where the company scored a 33/100 or lower in three different categories, the lowest being "title tag format and length." This is how much information appears in the large, blue search result links as well as the text descriptions that appear below them. The report points at several ways to fix this, including the use of "descriptive words and phrases in your page's title tag."

Another low point of the report is the company's score on the destination sites where images of logos led. These are the Google product logos that tend to reside in the upper left hand corner of the screen. The report found that well over half of these simply linked somewhere they were not supposed to, including 404 pages. Google's solution, which is SEO friendly, is to use 301 redirects across the board; that way all the links go to the same place, and the search engine can re-index the page in the proper location.

Not all the report was bad though. Google scored well in offering a clear main page result (or only having one or two links that lead to the main product page), as well as having proper use of headline tags and internal anchor text.

Below I've embedded the report through Scribd. Users can also download the full 1.6MB PDF here.


Josh Lowensohn writes for Webware.com, CNET's blog about Web applications and services. E-mail Josh, or follow him on Twitter at http://www.twitter.com/Josh.
Recent posts from Web Crawler
YouTube brings auto-captioning to everyone
Live blog Thursday: YouTube press conference
Google admits its SEO could use a little work
Viacom's departure from Hulu comes with a bite
Meet Gatsby, matchmaker for Foursquare users
Vimeo rolls out 'stats' feature for paying users
When good game consoles go bad
Dropcam puts home surveillance in the cloud
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (8 Comments)
  • prev
  • next
by t8 March 3, 2010 5:17 PM PST
At the end of the day, a good site will find its way near the top. The best way to game the system is to make a great web site.
Reply to this comment
by J_Atherton March 3, 2010 7:51 PM PST
A *little* work would be a good idea, see what you get when you search for the word "search"
http://jonatherton.com/2010/03/04/search-for-search/
It's even worse in Australia.
Reply to this comment
by EvanSei March 3, 2010 9:00 PM PST
I think it is great that google is looking at itself in such a bad way, most companies as big as google say "we are the biggest and do not need to improve" and as we all know that thinking as done wonders for MS, I think google will be top dog for a long time if they continue criticizing themselves
Reply to this comment 3 people like this comment
by myles taylor March 4, 2010 7:28 AM PST
It's good but it is also necessary. While most business (think Mac and PC) it's a big decision for people to switch to a competitor, with a search engine it can be a split second decision that can last forever. They have to stay on their game to keep on top more so than say Microsoft does with Windows.
by khoatd2005 March 3, 2010 11:51 PM PST
I think it's very good
Reply to this comment
by ahickey March 4, 2010 5:33 AM PST
I agree with EvanSei and khoatd2005. It is good that Google are doign this.

I took 3 things away.
1. Even being this bad they are doing quite well
2. I expect few people search for Google, so not that big an issue for them.
3. Now I have a checklist for what Google want. It's 49 pages long so I might be busy reading.
Reply to this comment
by Absolution2009 March 4, 2010 10:37 AM PST
I tried using other search providers like yahoo and msn but I always liked google because they don't bog my mind away from what I'm looking at (for instance Megan Fox article links etc. on yahoo and msn).

I do love Yahoo's top headlines where they have 29 ish rather than MSN's 3 though when I'm bored at work.
Reply to this comment
by taphilo March 4, 2010 1:35 PM PST
Their pages are so bad in SEO is likely because engineers created the pages and didn't do the effort in WORDS which is required to put in the text behind the web presentation (or in it) so that NON-Engineers and their own SE could find those pages and understand what those pages are about to people using words and meanings outside the Googlesphere.
Reply to this comment
(8 Comments)
  • prev
  • next
advertisement

Is Apple launching a patent war?

Apple's lawsuit against handset maker HTC could be just the beginning as the company mans the barricades in the smartphone market.

Feds weigh expansion of Internet monitoring

Homeland Security's top cybersecurity official tells CNET that the Einstein network defense system, which exchanges data with the NSA, could be extended to the private sector.

About Web Crawler

As the son of a Palm programmer, Josh Lowensohn grew up in a household full of technology. From a young age he was taking apart computers, finding hot new bulletin board systems, and re-programming video games. Josh currently covers the latest and greatest Web apps and services for CNET's Webware blog. Prior to that he covered news, and wrote reviews for GamersReports.com. For this blog Josh is exploring the latest Web apps and technologies, and trends in consumer entertainment devices.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Web Crawler topics

advertisement
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right