8849 (cache) Micro Nuke WTC Tritium Levels - When 20 is 'normal': How Does 1,092 = 'Traces'?
Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
Welcome!

You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.

Join our community!

Username:   Password:
Locked Topic
Micro Nuke WTC Tritium Levels - When 20 is 'normal': How Does 1,092 = 'Traces'?; Actually, 20 is HIGH 'normal' on a very lenient grading scale
Topic Started: Sep 29 2009, 03:40 PM (885 Views)
JFK
Member Avatar

Well Ed, since it is now obvious that you know what happened and resort to jibes to anything contrary to what you know you have in effect left no room for discussion on this ( your ) topic.

Therefore this will be my last post directed toward you unless of course you begin breaking the rules here.
Offline Profile Goto Top
 
Ed Ward MD

JFK
Oct 6 2009, 06:23 PM
This paper disagrees with you.
Do you wish ro re-edit that or are you in the habit of posting incorrect information?
Offline Profile Goto Top
 
Ed Ward MD

JFK
Oct 6 2009, 06:49 PM
I find it interesting that you laugh it off when those experiments have been recreated in many labs around the world and they have in fact created tritium without a nuclear blast... When what you are suggesting is that the only way to produce tritium is with a nuclear blast.
Do you wish ro re-edit , or do you have a habit of putting words into peoples supposed statements?
Offline Profile Goto Top
 
JFK
Member Avatar

JFK
Oct 6 2009, 07:21 PM
Well Ed, since it is now obvious that you know what happened and resort to jibes to anything contrary to what you know you have in effect left no room for discussion on this ( your ) topic.

Therefore this will be my last post directed toward you unless of course you begin breaking the rules here.
Obviously Ed can not read....

Perhaps he should read line three of the Board Rules since his last two posts were placed two minutes apart which is also considered spamming.

Edited by JFK, Oct 8 2009, 08:57 AM.
Offline Profile Goto Top
 
Ed Ward MD

JFK
Oct 8 2009, 08:56 AM
JFK
Oct 6 2009, 07:21 PM
Well Ed, since it is now obvious that you know what happened and resort to jibes to anything contrary to what you know you have in effect left no room for discussion on this ( your ) topic.

Therefore this will be my last post directed toward you unless of course you begin breaking the rules here.
Obviously Ed can not read....

Perhaps he should read line three of the Board Rules since his last two posts were placed two minutes apart which is also considered spamming.

Interesting answering 2 posts is spamming. A poor excuse is better than none to limit the truth exposure.
Offline Profile Goto Top
 
JFK
Member Avatar

Ed Ward MD
Oct 8 2009, 11:30 AM
JFK
Oct 8 2009, 08:56 AM
JFK
Oct 6 2009, 07:21 PM
Well Ed, since it is now obvious that you know what happened and resort to jibes to anything contrary to what you know you have in effect left no room for discussion on this ( your ) topic.

Therefore this will be my last post directed toward you unless of course you begin breaking the rules here.
Obviously Ed can not read....

Perhaps he should read line three of the Board Rules since his last two posts were placed two minutes apart which is also considered spamming.

Interesting answering 2 posts is spamming. A poor excuse is better than none to limit the truth exposure.
Well Ed, since you are a guest on this board and continue with your attitude towards myself perhaps you would be better off creating your own board.

Let me help you find the door.

Thread closed.
Offline Profile Goto Top
 
2 users reading this topic (2 Guests and 0 Anonymous)
« Previous Topic · Investigate 9/11 · Next Topic »
Locked Topic

0