McAfee uncovers riskiest domains
Red means danger. And orange offers plenty of risk, too. (Click for a larger view of the map.)
(Credit: McAfee)You may want to think twice if you hit a site with a .cm extension. That belongs to Cameroon, pegged by McAfee as the world's riskiest domain.
McAfee's third annual "Mapping the Mal Web" report, released Wednesday, looks at riskiest and safest domains across the globe. The small nation on the west coast of Africa reached the top spot this year with 36.7 percent of its sites posing a security risk. Because .cm is often a typo for .com, McAfee said, cybercrooks like to use that domain to set up typo-squatted sites to hit you with malware.
The generic and widely used .com domain itself isn't much safer, according to McAfee, jumping from ninth last year to second this year in riskiness, with 32.2 percent of its sites potentially hazardous to your PC's health.
Romania (.ro) is tagged as the riskiest domain for malicious downloads, with 21 percent of its sites delivering payloads of viruses, spyware, and adware. The information (.info) domain is seen by McAfee as the most "spammy," with 17.2 percent of its sites generating junk mail.
On the positive side, the government (.gov) is the safest generic domain with essentially 0 percent risk, while Japan (.jp) proved the safest country domain with a rating of only 0.1 percent. Last year's riskiest domain, Hong Kong (.hk) dropped to 34th place with a risk rating of only 1.1 percent, which McAfee attributed to the country's aggressive steps to stop scam-related domain registrations.
"This report underscores how quickly cybercriminals change tactics to lure in the most victims and avoid being caught. Last year, Hong Kong was the riskiest domain and this year it is dramatically safer," Mike Gallagher, chief technology officer for McAfee Labs, said in a statement. "Cybercriminals target regions where registering sites is cheap and convenient, and pose the least risk of being caught."
Overall, looking at 27 million Web sites and 104 top-level domains, McAfee found that 1.5 million sites, or 5.8 percent, were risky. That's up from 4.1 percent from the past two years, although the comparison is not direct since McAfee said it changed its rating methodology since then.
McAfee noted that cybercriminals who create domains to scam people prefer registrars with cheap prices, volume discounts, and hefty refund policies. Crooks also like registrars with a "no questions asked" policy and that act slowly or not at all when informed of malicious domains.
I know this is probably an Apple troll, but you realize it is still a PC right?
:)
And that rank is not only for viruses, I doubt that your shiny Mac will protect you from fake store sites, for example.
No matter what computer you use, if you visit a site that is fake or full of malware, chances are great that you will catch some...no matter if you use a Mac or a Windows or a Linux based PC....they are all pc's.
I guess shuyin here uses his/her frying pan to go online....LOL
1. By "PC" i mean an computer running on windows.
2. yes I am a troll.
3. yes i do really need to start it again, it keeps my school day "interesting."
4. There is a difference when your using different OS's. Now correct me if I'm wrong, and I might be, but I don't believe Windows offers phising and malware risk warning before you enter a site that the computer believes may be a security risk. Of course, this could also be offered through the browser you use rather than the operating system.
5. OMG FRYING PANS CAN GET ON THE INTERNET!!!?! TOASTERS TOO!!?!
Windoze on pc is an entirely different kettle of fish ... its kind of in another universe as far as security is concerned.
Plus you get other goodies like DRM ...
People who think using a Linux or Mac system gives them immunity from phishing or scamming websites are only proving their own ignorance on the subject. A web scam or phony banking website will work just as well on a Mac or Linux browser as it does on Windows.
Do you like getting flamed for trolling?
Yes, a mac IS a PC. Just to sum up all of the flaming you got, lol
try again; mister!
my cellphone is a PC too ;)
Yeah. I get by just fine with AVG and MBAM.
I just don't get the point of announcing rickiest domain by country other than to get people to hate a certain country.
Second, they explain that .cm is pretty darn close to .com, the other "worst" domain. If there was an .ocm extension, it would be on the list too.
Its not about race, its about money. Scammers can make more money by tricking you into going to .cm than they can going to .jp
someone needs to take a stand for the camaroonian race.
Should put an entire block to those domains on a company network in the USA.
Protection should always be local not at a national level.
http://www.theage.com.au/news/security/pacific-atolls-host-worlds-most-dangerous-websites/2007/03/16/1173722722104.html
Anyone has ideas about why it became safer in just two years?
Well, unless McAfee is just making things up and they never do any real research. </conspiracytheory>
;-)
There are viruses and malware specifically written to disable and infect computers running McAfee...so I guess the number of attacks and other trojans coming in would be more for a McAfee based computer as compared to one's running Norton or trend or kaspersky or eset.
McAfee needs to disappear or to SERIOUSLY get on their designers cases, stop having so many 'false positives', etc.
Really, most of the 'infections' could be mitigated by people getting off Windows XP... it is over 10 years old now, it's time to LET IT DIE it's well-deserved and overdue death.
same thought here
It should be "a computer" not "an computer."
3. yes i do really need to start it again, it keeps my school day "interesting."
Make your school day more "interesting" by staying awake during your English class.
RT
www.be-invisible.ua.tc
Also, dig a little deeper and give us a list of the ones who've registered these domains!
It makes more sense to boycott the ones who've registered these domains then a particular country.
We can put pressure on these registrars and force them to implement tighter rules.
It's rather obvious that if some entity is registering 1000 names and then cancels them after 24 hours that they are spammers, or worse!
If I found that my registrar was that lax, I would let them know why I was switching to another...