TOKCHI, Afghanistan -- The 82nd Airborne paratroopers rolled out at dawn, on what was to be a simple mission that lies at the heart of the war strategy: protect the Afghan people from extremist insurgents.
The failure of their mission – the paratroopers' tactical withdrawal from a howling, stone-throwing mob in this dusty farming village – speaks volumes about the difficulty and likely duration of the war in Afghanistan.
Under the war strategy adopted by the Obama administration this spring, "protect the people'' means training the Afghan army and police and helping them enforce the rule of law by working alongside them on counter-insurgency operations.
That concept "briefs well – it looks good on PowerPoint and it sounds good if you're standing behind a podium and the cameras are rolling," said Capt. Booker T. Wilson, the company commander who led the mission. "But doing it is like a football game in the mud. There's nothing pretty about it."
(Note to White House staffers drafting "benchmarks" to measure progress in the war: Keep reading to see how you would grade the situation in Tokchi, and hundreds of similar villages. Do you see lots of gray areas?)
On this mission, Afghan police were to accompany about 40 paratroopers into Tokchi, a village suspected of allowing rocket attacks against forces and harboring participants in an IED network. Random searches of houses and targeted searches of some suspected arms caches were the core of this mission, in part to demonstrate that Afghan and authorities are keeping an eye on places like Tokchi.
Keeping the insurgents "off balance," unsure where they can safely operate and whom they can trust, is a high priority in the days before the upcoming Afghan elections scheduled for August 20. Tokchi is typical in this respect: most villagers seem to support the Afghan government and the presence. But some might agree to look the other way if a pair of insurgents on a motorcycle comes through with a rocket launcher; a few may accept money to store explosives in their compound overnight. As one paratrooper obseerves: "Fifty American dollars goes a long way around here.''
Dealing with such mixed motives and social nuances would be difficult for any law enforcement operation. They are more difficult still for American combat soldiers and Afghan police struggling to become a professional force after decades of war and corruption.
Under the new strategy, all military missions must include either Afghan National Army (ANA) or Afghan National Police (ANP). Involving the Afghan police raises difficulties, Lt. Col. Chris Eubank, who commands the 82nd Airborne Division Special Troops Battalion, told me. Eubank's troops prepare meticulously for such missions, poring over intelligence reports and maps, selecting the village, and even the specific houses to be searched, planning the precise timing and movements of each squad.
Should they share all that with the ANP guys? "Because there is a lot of corruption across, when we tell the Afghan police anything, we risk having them tell the village,'' Eubank said. Suspects and weapons will be long gone when the troops arrive. On the other hand, the Afghan police confer an aura of legitimacy for U.S. troops among suspicious villagers. In theory, at least, the presence of Afghan authorities tells the villages: It's okay to let these Americans in here, they're with us.
Eubank leans toward cooperation. "My approach is to tell them everything, and see what happens,'' he said. "Because I am trying to get them to do their job.''
Duly alerted that the target was the village of Tokchi, eight members of the ANP mustered for the mission, in two pick-up trucks – a token presence, "but at least they sent somebody,'' a paratrooper observed. Three days earlier a similar mission was scrubbed when the ANP never showed.
With the ANP following, paratroopers hit the village at 7:30 am, their big armored MRAP trucks growling into the village outskirts in clouds of dust. Dismounted soldiers, weapons at the ready, warily stepped along beaten-earth paths squeezed between eight-foot mud walls that form a maze of courtyards, shuttered adobe rooms and small plots of grapes and sunflowers. Brown water gurgled along irrigation ditches.
Within minutes, a radio report: The ANP refuse to participate in any searches of homes. Twenty minutes later, another report: The provincial governor says it's okay to search homes. In the rising heat, chickens and goats nose the dirt beneath mulberry trees. Small boys watch solemnly from doorways. Sweating paratroopers scan rooftops and alleyways for snipers. Teenagers watch sullenly or turn their backs.
No women, of course. They're all inside and out of sight. Afghans are extremely sensitive about keeping their women away from Westerners and non-Muslims and unrelated men (and the paratroopers are all three). Anticipating this problem, the paratroopers brought women soldiers to assist in the house searches. That gesture will not help.
Soon the village "elder'' arrives, a bearded man in his mid-thirties. With a broad smile he gestures Booker Wilson, his interpreter, and me into his large adobe and stucco home; the three of us settle on red cushions in an airy second-floor meeting room which soon fills with a crowd of bearded and turbaned men. For 90 minutes, the legal, political and religious justifications for the Americans' presence are hotly debated, and the arguments go nowhere.
"If there are any weapons or explosives here we will take care of it ourselves,'' insists Asadullah, the elder. "If we find these things we will burn the house down, but we will do it ourselves.''
Wilson: "I know there are individuals moving around your village who are responsible for rocket attacks and IEDs. I know this,'' he stresses.
"It is legal for me and the ANP to search houses. We don't need your permission,'' Wilson adds, a pronouncement that, when translated, provokes a fresh burst of objections.
"I am the village elder and if I had known you were going to search houses I would not have let you in here,'' Asadullah fumes, fingering a string of worry beads.
Things calm down with the arrival of more senior police and district officials. A deal is struck: The ANP will lead the searches. Women soldiers will lead all Afghan females into a separate room which will not be searched.
One wizened old man worries that suspicion will fall on any family whose house is searched. He is assured the searches are random, although the paratroopers have a list of six houses they suspect hold weapons. Back out on the dirt paths to begin the searches, the paratroopers find a crowd of noisy youths has gathered, blocking the way. "Tell them to calm down – if anything happens in this village, it's your fault,'' Wilson shouts at Asadullah, the elder.
Now there's a full-blown confrontation: Angry kids yelling and throwing rocks, ANP looking on helplessly, village elders trying to intervene, and the paratroopers watching warily. In the crowd they spot a bearded young man on their list of suspects. He is also leading the mob in angry chants of "Allahu Akbar!''
At a nod from Wilson, two soldiers move to get him, a tussle ensues and they wrestle him to the ground in a cloud of dust and kicking limbs. As they secure his hands behind his back, the crowd roars and presses forward.
"The ANP is egging them on!'' Wilson cries in disbelief.
"Allahu Akbar!'' the crowd screams.
Now a crucial decision: The paratroopers are well-armed professionals and not really threatened by a few rocks. They could take down this crowd and restore order.
But that would be messy, and the cost in bruised village pride would be high.
"Okay let's go!'' Wilson orders. "Get a head count on the way out!''
Later, he muses that the entire scene may have been a set-up: the village elders seeming to agree to house searches while slipping word to the town's rowdies to start a disturbance to prevent the searches from actually happening. Was that because the village was hiding insurgents? Or from local pride and determination to protect their privacy? Or a mixture of both?
In any event, the day was far from a total loss. The paratroopers came back with one suspect in custody, and they picked up other intelligence on suspected weapons caches and insurgents' movements.
"As ugly as it was, we were able to confirm there is anti-coalition sentiment in Tokchi,'' Wilson told me as we headed back to base. "In everything you do, there's always a measure of gain,'' said Wilson, his voice reflecting the cadence and wisdom of his
Jackson, Mississippi upbringing.
Simple solution: Back away out of RPG range, dig in, and keep the village under surveillance. Anyone come out to plant an IED or carrying a weapon takes a dirt nap.
RATE THIS COMMENT: (6)
knute9
2:42PM Aug 10th 2009
There is no such thing as a nice war. Right now we are fighting a war with two sets of rules, on many levels. One level is the media. Why is the media suppressing the news of cruelty the Taliban unleashes of civilians? Maybe we should give the same amount of Freedom of Press as the Taliban does.
RATE THIS COMMENT: (6)
joedee1969
11:50AM Aug 10th 2009
Now that Walter is gone. Who will tell us the truth about war?
RATE THIS COMMENT: (-2)
Tina
1:48PM Aug 10th 2009
Uncle Walter Didn't always tell the truth. That is a known fact
RATE THIS COMMENT: (4)
jodylrwebb
2:00PM Aug 10th 2009
Your uncle Walter in many extents bent, and stretched the truth very, very badly. Perhaps its best to look toward another role model.
RATE THIS COMMENT: (4)
oscarcc002
11:54AM Aug 10th 2009
It is wrong for a man have a rich woman or a woman have a wealthy man?
It is an absolutely extramarital relationship. but more and more services come out on Internet focusing on this kind of relationship.
it's the biggest dating site for wealthy and suclessful people.
RATE THIS COMMENT: (0)
mislz7
12:04PM Aug 10th 2009
So the young man was detained for "anti-coalition sentiment". Sounds very dangerous to me, like Soviet Russia, Nazi Germany or 21st century America.
RATE THIS COMMENT: (-6)
hello andy
1:13PM Aug 10th 2009
misled, I guess you didn't read the story or don't know how to read. They picked him up because he was suspected of insurgent activities not because he doesn't like us.
RATE THIS COMMENT: (6)
carlton
1:45PM Aug 10th 2009
No kid, he wasn't detained for "anti-coalition sentiment". He was arrested on suspicion of being involved in an IED ring, which was the motive for the mission in the first place. Try actually reading the stories before you comment, or is it that your level of reading comprehension isn't up to snuff?
RATE THIS COMMENT: (6)
yoas
4:12PM Aug 10th 2009
Read the story again. You have it wrong.
RATE THIS COMMENT: (1)
nicholasalman
4:22PM Aug 10th 2009
You obviously chose to pursue a selectively distorted-- absurd, interpretation of the article. Read once more, and try again moron.
RATE THIS COMMENT: (0)
mislz7
7:16PM Aug 10th 2009
It would appear that none of you read the article all the way through. Why was the person detained? Also, one man's "mob" is another man's "crowd", just as one man's "insurgent" ia another's "patriot". I would add that our troops and their leaders are doing a good job under the circumstances, given all the politics involved. Just like football teams can play well enough to overcome their coaching staff. I would assume our troops are doing a good job, as no news to speak of is ever reported out of Afghanistan or Iraq.
RATE THIS COMMENT: (0)
lrm
12:12PM Aug 10th 2009
sounds a LOT like vietnam....firebases to protect the villagers from viet cong(now taliban) ambigious loyalties, difficulty in enemy combatant id...no central population centers..no command and control...much worse than iraq! this is obamas vietnam..
RATE THIS COMMENT: (6)
lrm
12:13PM Aug 10th 2009
predators and more predators; this is what they should do.
RATE THIS COMMENT: (6)
valobladr
2:55PM Aug 10th 2009
predators are the worse thing for modern warfare, in a sense it removes the human from direct conflict, and i fear that without the risk of american soldier being lost in combat, then people will be more willing to approve of warfare, the idea of going to war is that this is a last chance kind of deal that the country is willing to sacrifice for, without the chance of friendly death, that risk evaporates and in its place rests recklessness
RATE THIS COMMENT: (-6)
lrm
12:17PM Aug 10th 2009
the obama admin sounds a perfect parrallel to the kenedy/johnson-mcnamara era....they share the same level of arrogance and idealism that sent new rifles with untested ammo to green recruits...causing many deaths from jammed weapons...they told the soildiers that they never had to clean these...same strategy large firebase....protecting villages...good thing the raghedz are nowhere near as smart as the Vietcong were. hopefully we are not in for the same level of embarrassment.
RATE THIS COMMENT: (2)
Darrell
3:38PM Aug 10th 2009
Careful now. Your ignorance is showing. Obviously, if you're old enough to remember the "Kennedy/Johnson-McNamara era"......., then you should beg to differ. You speak of arrogance, as if you were hibernating the previous 8yrs or something... Perhaps you didn't lose a dime, in the form of Investment Funds, because if you had...your view would clearly be the exact opposite. Funny how he still won the election, yet we continue to read majority anti-Obama hate statements. Perhaps that means his supporters aren't as miserable...?
RATE THIS COMMENT: (-3)
Rheinhart Moxon
10:27PM Aug 10th 2009
.they share the same level of arrogance and idealism that sent new rifles with untested ammo to green recruits...causing many deaths from jammed weapons...they told the soildiers that they never had to clean these... ================= Now who made those weapons for our troops to use?
RATE THIS COMMENT: (0)
lrm
12:19PM Aug 10th 2009
way to read things in to a simple article...why don't we send you and your idealistic A** over to see if you can talk sense into the raghedz.
RATE THIS COMMENT: (4)
randyclay720
12:33PM Aug 10th 2009
Can we just bring back the free fire zones and napalm. It usually gets us some respect. The only thing these Muslims respect is strength. God, I wish Obama would stop expanding this war. He lied, and now our boys are dying.