The Strange Case of Dr. Geoff Leventhall

Submitted by AnneBritton on Thu, 04/14/2005 - 9:43pm.

... there is a man named Dr. Geoff Leventhall from the United Kingdom who hires himself out to wind energy companies as a noise consultant -- the noise being from industrial wind turbines.

The interesting thing about this Leventhall is that he insists, in the face of clear evidence to the contrary, that industrial wind turbines produce no low frequency noise (basically, infrasound). So he wrote in the Malone (New York, USA) Telegram this past autumn, "I have always said ... there is no problem of infrasound from wind turbines" (p. 4). Earlier this month (February 2006) he was quoted in the Hawke's Bay Today (New Zealand) newspaper as saying, "'I can state quite categorically that there is no significant infrasound from current designs of wind turbines.'"

Dr. Leventhall doesn't seem to know what he thinks. For when we turn to his May 2003 DEFRA (UK) "Review of Published Research on Low Frequency Noise and Its Effects," he writes: "Infrasound ... is common in urban environments, and as an emission from many artificial sources ... including wind turbines." Oops! Leventhall goes on: "The effects of infrasound or low frequency noise are of particular concern because of its pervasiveness due to numerous sources, efficient propagation, and reduced efficiency of many structures (dwellings, walls, and hearing protection) in attenuating low frequency noise compared with other noise" (p. 54). (Turn to the footnote back on p. 53 of the "Review" and we're told this section was "contributed by" Dr. P.L. Pelmear. This does not let Leventhall off the ethical hook, however; as lead author he must take full responsibility for everything in his report.)

Like I say, Leventhall doesn't seem to know what he thinks. For that matter, it's not clear he and his co-authors do the thinking they take credit for. When we turn to Dr. Birgitta Berglund's "Sources and Effects of Low-Frequency Noise" in the Journal of the Acoustical Society of America (May 1996), we find that the entire paragraph, above, appears to be lifted virtually verbatim from Berglund's article (compare the two paragraphs, below).

Hmmmm. Pelmear/Leventhall fail to acknowledge Berglund as their (apparent) source, nor do they put quotation marks around their text. A double infraction. (When I was a university professor, I gave students a failing grade for copying someone else's material without credit; indeed I had a colleague who was de-tenured and fired for publishing other people's text without credit.)

At a minimum, Leventhall appears to be careless. He also appears to be indecisive. Mostly, however, given the growing body of research on low frequency noise from industrial wind turbines (see GP van den Berg's scholarly articles, along with Dr. O. Soysal's noise measurements at the Meyersdale, PA, USA, windplant, and Dr. DMJP Manley's research), Leventhall seems to be a man representing, above all, the agenda of the wind energy companies (like Noble Environmental, LLC) that employ his services.

Calvin Luther Martin, PhD
Associate Professor of History (retired)
Rutgers University
New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA

PS Anyone wishing to see scanned copies of each of the publications referred to, above, may contact me at rushton2@westelcom.com and I will be happy to furnish them.

On Tue, 08/29/2006 - 11:32am, TVE (not verified) said:

Please explain the nature of the claimed inconsistency here.

As an expert of 35 years in the field of acoustics (rather than being a retired historian), Dr Leventhall knows that wind turbines generate an amount of low frequency noise. He also knows that the level from wind turbines is so low that there are no health problems associated with it, hence the amount is insignificant.

Both these judgements are very clear from the statements by Dr Leventhall and however hard I try, I can find no inconsistency between them.

Readers may wish to find out more about Leventhall's comments on low frequency noise, wind turbines, and those who spread "confusion and misinformation" about it: http://www.windenergy.org.nz/news/news-articles/2004/040604-LeventhallLowFrequency.htm. Incidentally, Dr Leventhall is an independent consultant and has produced reports on this subject for the UK government - two excellent reasons, you might think, why wind energy companies (or anti-wind campaigners if they so wished) might choose to use his services.

On Wed, 08/30/2006 - 11:49pm, AnneBritton said:

The nature of the inconsistency has been explained in plain English, as well as demonstrated with references. Please read carefully. He has been paid by Noble Environmental Power and his findings on a study he had done a year earlier, suddenly changed findings.

On Sat, 10/07/2006 - 8:17am, Visitor said:

I guess the folks on this email thread didn't read his orignal article. He basically stated that all things mechnical produce to some low frequency sound: Including washer machines and wind turbines. However the volume is so low that it doesn't present a problem. That's why he can say "wind turbines don't cause problems" and its consistent with "wind turbines create low frequency sound". There is not an inconsitency in this statement. I find it rather appalling that his professional character would be attacked and misquoted. If you search of his name is this DEIS reponse you find just how outraged he is about being mis-quoted by Dr. Pierpoint. Shame on you!

On Wed, 10/18/2006 - 1:07pm, Visitor said:

Strange case of Anne: I read thru the comments by the visitor above, the original material by Dr. Leventhall as well as the acoustics professional above and I'd have to agree - Anne and the WOW community owe Dr. Leventhall an apology instead of defending their mistake. At the least - they should pull this from the site.