Markets
U.S. open in 29 hrs, 56 mins
BUSINESS NEWS
- Market News
- Earnings
- Recalls
- Recession Watch
- Tech News
- Financial Crisis
- Madoff Scandal
- BloggingStocks
- Luxist
- Money Videos
INVESTING
- Stock Quotes
- Stock Charts
- Stock Ticker
- Currencies
- Portfolio
- Stock Screener
- Broker Center
- Mutual Fund Center
- ETF Center
- Money
- 24/7 Wall St.
- Financial Glossary
PERSONAL FINANCE AT WALLETPOP
- Bargains
- Banking
- Budget
- Calculators
- College Finance
- Community
- Credit
- Deals
- Debt
- Economizer
- Food
- Home
- Fraud
- Insurance
- Interest Rates
- Loans
- Mortgages
- Real Estate
- Recalls
- Recession
- Retirement
- Saving
- Simplification
- Specials
- Taxes
SMALL BUSINESS
Obama Rejects Second Round of Stimulus
By MATT APUZZO
, AP
WASHINGTON (July 11) - President Barack Obama on Saturday dismissed the idea the nation might need a second stimulus to jolt the economy out of recession and urged Americans to be patient with his economic recovery plan.
Faced with rising unemployment numbers and criticism from Republicans who have already labeled the $787 billion stimulus a failure, Obama used his weekly radio and Internet address to remind voters that reversing job losses takes time.
He criticized Republicans for opposing the stimulus but offering few alternatives to the worst recession since the Great Depression. And he rejected talk of a second stimulus, an idea that has been discussed by Democrats and even famed investor Warren Buffett.
"We must let it work the way it's supposed to, with the understanding that in any recession, unemployment tends to recover more slowly than other measures of economic activity," Obama, who is visiting Ghana on Saturday, said in his recorded message.
The stimulus included $288 billion in tax cuts, dramatic increases in Medicaid spending, about $48 billion in highway and bridge construction and billions more to boost energy efficiency, shore up state budgets and improve schools.
The plan "was not designed to work in four months," Obama said. "It was designed to work over two years."
Since Obama signed the stimulus into law, the economy has lost more than 2 million jobs and the unemployment rate has climbed higher than the White House predicted it would have ever reached without the stimulus.
Some companies say stimulus money helped avoid layoffs. Independent government auditors found that stimulus aid to states helped keep teachers off unemployment lines. But overall job numbers continue to suffer.
Republicans have seized on this opportunity to criticize the president, but they have struggled to find their collective voice. At a news conference Friday, Republican lawmakers criticized the White House for spending so much, while simultaneously saying the administration wasn't spending it fast enough.
With the Obama administration now pushing for a costly overhaul of the nation's health care system, Republicans are casting Democrats as liberals on a shopping spree. In the GOP's weekly address Saturday, Virginia Rep. Eric Cantor, the House Republican whip, accused the Democratic-controlled Congress of reckless spending and careless borrowing.
Though the Republican stimulus proposal this January had its own deficit-pushing price tag of $478 billion, Cantor and Republicans are trying to make their case against Obama as one of fiscal restraint.
"For the stimulus alone, Washington borrowed nearly $10,000 from every American household," Cantor said. "Let me ask you: Do you feel $10,000 richer today?"
In his speech, Obama twice referred to "cleaning up the wreckage" of a recession that began on President George W. Bush's watch. But with Obama's poll numbers slipping on economic issues, Republicans want to lay the economy at the president's feet.
"This is now President Obama's economy," Cantor said.
—
On the Net:
Obama:
http://www.whitehouse.gov
Copyright 2009 The Associated Press. The information contained in the AP news report may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or otherwise distributed without the prior written authority of The Associated Press. Active hyperlinks have been inserted by AOL.
2009-07-11 08:04:23
COMMENTS ( 640 )
Latest Money News
- Special alloy sleeves urged to block hackers?
- Chips in official IDs raise privacy fears
- Australia: Employee detention could hurt China biz
- Obama Rejects Second Stimulus Package
- CEO vows better performance as GM exits bankruptcy
- CIT Group said to hire bankruptcy adviser
- ALL BUSINESS: More toxic loans could haunt banks
Look at this one incredibly awful run-on sentence which is presented as a paragraph:
"Faced with rising unemployment numbers and criticism from Republicans who have already labeled the $787 billion stimulus a failure, Obama used his weekly radio and Internet address to remind voters that reversing job losses takes time."
Amazingly bad. Deserves to be an example of What Not To Do in a writing textbook.
Remember, a paragraph's supposed to be one thought. New thought, new paragraph. What thoughts wandered through the writer's mind in this turkey?
"Faced with ... 1)- Rising unemployment numbers (hard fact) 2)- Criticism from Republicans (soft fact, it depends on who you ask) 3)- who have labeled the (also soft) 4)- $787 billion stimulus (hard fact) 5) a failure (soft) COMMA 6) Obama used his weekly radio and Internet address (hard fact) 7) to remind voters ("voters"?!!?) 8) that reversing job losses takes time (come in Earth, this is Mars)."
In other words, this sentence is a *mess* because in 36 words it has 8 ideas randomly crammed together with superglue at the very damndest places. It should be several sentences to achieve something approaching coherence. But the story is full of sentences like this.
It definitely steps over the line from reporting into ... well, pure fantasy ... when it says that Obama reminded "voters", not "listeners". Apparently the writer feels that only voters tune in.
For an simply awe inspiring example of how far this writer -will- go to jam anything into anywhere, read this:
"We must let it work the way it's supposed to, with the understanding that in any recession, unemployment tends to recover more slowly than other measures of economic activity," Obama, who is visiting Ghana on Saturday, said in his recorded message.
What would happen if we put apples with apples and oranges with oranges in this sentences? We could put all the stuff about Republicans in one place and so forth. I don't know what will happen either. It might be amusing to find out. Let's see here ... we start with this ...
"Faced with ... 1)- Rising unemployment numbers (hard fact) 2)- Criticism from Republicans (soft fact, it depends on who you ask) 3)- who have labeled the (also soft) 4)- $787 billion stimulus (hard fact) 5) a failure (soft) COMMA 6) Obama used his weekly radio and Internet address (hard fact) 7) to remind voters ("voters"?!!?) 8) that reversing job losses takes time (8 soft, opinion, come in Earth, this is Mars)."
First, the of the paragraph is to summarize quickly the radio address. So, we write this...
"Obama devoted time during his weekly radio address to answering Republican criticism about his $787 billion stimulus plan. Republicans have labeled the plan a failure. Obama, noting rising unemployment numbers, asked for patience, saying that reversing job losses takes time."
This easygoing style comes in at 40 words, communicates the same information, and isn't a crazy-quilt of facts randomly thrown together.