Haunting Clue Examined in Murder Case

shoesplaces

03:25 AMJul 06 2009

<a href="http://touchnike.com/nike-air-max-shoes-c-198.html">nike air max</a>, <a href="http://touchnike.com/nike-dunk-sb-shoes-c-197.html">nike sb dunks</a>, <a href="http://touchnike.com/nike-basketball-shoes-c-230.html">nike basketball shoes</a>

ChristiPi2

02:18 AMJul 06 2009

saintbrides that looks like cloth to me Im looking at it with a magnafying glass it is red,green,orange,black,blue it is showing on the one side of the stone. the stone?has a little colors in it to

Xskunk3hx

07:48 PMJul 05 2009

easily tell that the scene is warmly lit, where as the blue thing seems to have no direction of light hitting it whatsoever. Lastly, if you look just next to it (on the edge of the image), you can see a small arch of white where there was text originally on the image. Being experienced with photomanipulation, I'd say that it's a watermark (sort of like a copyright).

Xskunk3hx

07:44 PMJul 05 2009

Okay people, seriously, quit trying to matrix things out of the image. Here's some things to bring light on the situation of the mystery blue thing in the bottom corner.The size of the rock in relation to the blue thing: From the rest of the image, anyone with common knowledge can tell that it's about a foot and a half tall at least. How, you're wondering? Well for one the rock in the background is at least half it's size and for the leaves and the background rock to show up as well as they do for such a pixelated image they must be a good size. However the main stone still isn't very tall in relation to the plants. So, let's say that the rock is 1 foot and a half tall at the least, the blue "object" would be far too small (no matter what color) to show up as clearly on the image. It's also far too small to be ear warmers or shoes unless they were infant shoes and it's not an infant that went missing. Another clue that it's not an original part of the image is the lighting. You can

Smith906

06:51 PMJul 05 2009

There are several books. And there are lots of people, like myself, who went to Upper Merion and saw this unfold. There is no way this crime could have taken place without those 5 knowing something. They were thick as thieves and made a pact with the devil because they continue to withhold evidence regarding a capital offense -- and if one speaks, they go down together.

Sookyaya

06:42 PMJul 05 2009

Smith906 Do you happen to know if there's been a book written about this crime?

Smith906

06:38 PMJul 05 2009

The information regarding "where are the children buried" is known by: Vince Valitis; Sue Meyers; Wendy Ziegler; Chris Pappas and Joanne Aikens. All 5 of them have knowledge -- some day hopefully one of them will get tired of staring at the blood stains on their hands and break the "covenant of silence". Upper Merion Class of '77 graduate

Sookyaya

06:38 PMJul 05 2009

Mugsy- The appeals court cited improper hearsay testimony and said prosecutors withheld evidence from Smith's defense.

NeffVW

06:37 PMJul 05 2009

I guess if they ddnt kill him they could have asked him.

Sookyaya

06:35 PMJul 05 2009

ZELDA5444 Oh your right! I think it's behind the photographer though and the shadow is being cast on a rock behind the Stone.