|
|
|
|
|||||||
| World Markets | ShareLynx | Futures | Money Masters | INO Markets | INO Metals | Asian Mrkets | Pre-market | Download Youtube |
| Conspiracies Conspiracies posted here - 9/11 Etc. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Richard Koshimizu has made a video
Some intelligent comments are made here http://www.wakeupfromyourslumber.com/node/5740#comments Richard's site http://www15.ocn.ne.jp/~oyakodon/newver ... nsou.e.htm |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
The mini-nuke stuff has so far been well-debunked, plus I saw everything after the first impact, I was there (and still am.) Controlled demo: .999 fine. Mini-nuke: .001 fine. The culprits are inhaled airborne contaminates and physical contact with non-airborne contaminates, not science fiction, unless you include the EPA's science fiction. Here's the story about one of my friends who are now departed: http://www.dc37.net/news/PEP/6_2007/9_11Pennigton.html
__________________
"The production of too many useful things results in too many useless people." -- Karl Marx "I love a dog. He does nothing for political reasons." -- Will Rogers |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
As to the exact causes of the cancers experienced by the 911 responders, I read that most environmental cancers take longer to present than was the case with the aftermath of 911. And also that the range of cancers matches for radiation. Not to say that people did not also get horrendous conventional contamination, as the post mortem on your friend attests. I am unsure as to whether thermite, nuclear or other devices were used to bring down WTC. I found it odd that the fusion scientist ex Lawrence Livermore with a history of aiding and abetting cover-up (Pons and Flieschman) should emerge as scientific whistleblower for the 911 truth movement.iIn my experience many 911 truth organisations are controlled opposition, as is a well known method of the elite. If micronukes were used they were not used singly as Richard Koshimizu suggested. You can clearly see a demolition sequence firing down the sides of the towers ahead of the collapse. However it is possible that the use of micronukes reduced many times the amount of materiel required to be installed in the buildings. Nuclear demolition is an old science, and it does not seem unreasonable that it has been refined way beyond this model http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special...ition_Munition There is some evidence that fusion charges may have been used. This includes the remarkable residual heat, the vapourisation of people, the elevated tritium levels found even after copious washing of the site, the pictures of cars on fire with welded doors, yet adjacent trees remain unharmed, in paper-strewn streets. It is really hard to see how any conventional blast could produce sufficient heat to weld car doors and melt car engines, while leaving young trees unaffected. However, nuclear radiation would explain this. It would also explain why paper was strewn across scenes of vehicles on fire, yer the paper is not. Radiation is readily captured by metal, which is superheated from the inside. Let's say I am a scientist charged with developing a SADM to facilitate in the demolition of modern steel-framed skyscrapers. I would try to develop a device that rendered concrete into dust (to avoid collateral physical damage). One that had a controlled focus in order to control the demolition, a shaped charge. It may be very difficult in future to economically demolish very tall buildings, yet this must be done, for eventually they will topple over as metal fatigue etc sets in. Therefore there is a commercial imperative to develop such devices as may have been used @ WTC. Richard implies the site was rinsed almost as if it was a laboratory being cleansed, with vast amounts of water over a long period. Also I understand that after the sunny and photogenic 911 heavy rain storms washed the area, and in both those instances I do not rule out weather modification. It seems there were thousands of Israeli spies in the US in the time leading up to 911, many of whom were explosive ordnance experts. Let's say they had limited time to rig the building after Larry Silverstein and Frank Lowy acquired the lease and presciently took out a massive terror insurance policy. The micronuke option may have been a great facilitator here. Perhaps it was the audacious success of their plot that encouraged some MOSSAD agents to cheer and film the buildings as they burned. (Of course the FACT they were caught with Arab Clothing leads one to suspect that, were we ever to be shown the actual footage they shot, another synergistic reason for filming may be revealed.) Some will groan at the idea of bringing up micronukes when the sensible shoes side of the '911 truth community' is so solid behind Steven Jones. I was a member of the UK 911 truth forum. I was kicked off the site for proving Holocaust fakery. What good is a truth site where certain truths are barred? These sites are evangelical in their support for S Jones. Perhaps they have never seen how he dealt with Pons and Fleischman, whose cold fusion experiments may just have hinted at how to create a clean hydrogen bomb. Regards rodin |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
A previous poster (Antonio) supplies the following information
Quote:
New York wants to ban geiger counters http://dwarmstr.blogspot.com/2008/01...-counters.html |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Soething causes puffs of smoke to emanate simultaneously from all visible sides of the building suggesting core blast at that level
Comparison with H-test Aftermath |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
9/11
It's like what Dick Gregory said: If you know, you know, and I don't have to tell you. And if by now, you're so damn stupid that you don't know, you don't deserve to be told. If you haven't figured it out by now.
__________________
"As scarce as truth is, the supply has always been in excess of the demand." "Religion was created when the first scoundrel met the first fool" |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|