Published online 25 February 2009 | Nature | doi:10.1038/news.2009.122

News

Fossils reveal early evidence for penetrative sex

Ancient male fish may have had a long, articulated organ for mating.

Ancient fishPlacoderms may have copulated in a similar way to sharks.The Museum of Victoria

Fish swimming 380 million years ago may have engaged in penetrative sex in a manner similar to modern sharks, a new study has revealed.

The finding, discussed in a Nature video, also shows that reproduction by internal fertilization was much more widespread in early jawed vertebrates than was previously believed1.

John Long of Monash University in Clayton, Australia, and Kate Trinajstic of the University of Western Australia in Perth had previously been part of a team that discovered small plates of armour inside a number of fossilized armour-plated placoderm fishes2. The group showed that, rather than being dinner, these smaller plates were actually embryos (See: The oldest pregnant mum).

Now, along with Zerina Johanson of London's Natural History Museum, they show that the pelvic girdles of one species of extinct placoderm — Incisoscutum ritchiei — may have had long, articulated pieces of cartilage attached, which the fish could have used during copulation in a similar way to the claspers that male sharks use to penetrate females.

"We have an expression that humans like to get a leg over," Long says. "But these placoderms actually like to get a leg in."

  • References

    1. Long, J. , Trinajstic, K. & Johanson, Z. Nature 457, 1124– 1127 (2009).
    2. Long, J. A. , Trinajstic, K. , Young, G. C. & Senden, T. Nature 453, 650– 652 (2008).

Comments

Reader comments are usually moderated after posting. If you find something offensive or inappropriate, you can speed this process by clicking 'Report this comment' (or, if that doesn't work for you, email redesign@nature.com). For more controversial topics, we reserve the right to moderate before comments are published.

Add your own comment

You can be as critical or controversial as you like, but please don't get personal or offensive, and do keep it brief. Remember this is for feedback and discussion - not for publishing papers, press releases or advertisements, for example. If you ramble on in an annoying way too often, we may remove your posting privileges.

You need to be registered with Nature to leave a comment. Please log in or register as a new user. You will be re-directed back to this page.