Monday, August 18, 2008

More "Bodies Revealed" Revelations, Update 1

Last week we posted an item demonstrating that contrary to published reports, no documentation of consent exists for the Chinese cadavers on display at Union Station. The story also raised additional questions about the limited availability of legitimately donated bodies in China. The Kansas City secular media continues to ignore the story.

This week, we'll be further fleshing out the story.

Few bodies in China . . . Glut in the U.S.

When publicity for the Bodies Revealed show claimed the bodies on display came from accredited medical universities, The Key decided to contact the medical university closest to Nanjing Suyi Plastination Laboratories, where the bodies were received and prepared.

Googling for a contact, the Key found a March 2008 article from a journal of the American Association of Anatomists authored by anatomy faculty at Nanjing Medical University. Titled, "An Ethical Solution to the Challenges in Teaching Anatomy With Dissection in the Chinese Culture," the article documents and laments the shortage of bodies available for medical education at Chinese universities.

The authors also explain steps taken by Nanjing Medical University to increase body donations in a culture where they say, "One of the many factors limiting cadaver donations is traditional Chinese views of the body." The Nanjing authors claim that 80 bodies are needed per year for teaching purposes at Nanjing Medical University while they receive fewer than 30 per year.

How, we wondered, could there be a shortage of bodies available for medical education in China when there are hundreds of Chinese cadavers touring the U.S.? Why would a medical university in need of bodies for teaching be handing them over for foreign entertainment purposes?

We asked Dr. Jiong Ding, a co-author of the journal report and Chair of Anatomy at Nanjing Medical University, to explain the discrepancy. As we reported in our earlier post, he said:

"I declare seriously, the bodies of volunteer donors we received are only used for anatomy teaching in our Nanjing Medical University. We have never provided any body to any companies for making plastinated bodies or for any commercial behavior. The plastinated bodies showing in the United States from Nanjing has no relation with our university."

Beyond throwing cold water on the claim that bodies exhibit specimens come from medical universities, the Nanjing authors make several other pertinent points.

In their introduction to the journal article, the authors state:

". . . ethical issues pervade the methods used to study the human body, primarily cadaver dissection. It raises questions about the appropriate treatment of the human body in both death and life. A cadaver represents not only a scientific model of human anatomy, but a person that lived and deserves proper dignity and respect."

In order to increase medical donations in a culture that frowns upon the practice, Nanjing Medical University has taken several steps to alert the public of the need and value of medical donations and to ensure them that the deceased are treated ethically and with respect:

"Most recently, Nanjing University created a body donation website as well as a ‘'memorial forest’' for those who have donated their bodies to medicine. When a volunteer body donation occurs, the University invites relatives of the donor to plant an evergreen tree on campus, signifying the life-giving gift of the donor. There are also plans to construct a permanent monument in the forest as a tribute to donors who have dedicated their bodies to medicine. All incoming freshmen at the University will be encouraged to pay their respects to past donors at the memorial as one of their first acts as part of the University community. From the memorial forest, every student will sense the nobility of body donation and further contemplate the moral and ethical issues involved in body donation."

Nanjing Medical University has also instituted a program to integrate medical ethics into its anatomy program:

"As anatomy teachers, we are responsible for integrating a medical ethics education into human anatomy instruction. It is our duty to encourage students to adapt a proper attitude of respect and gratitude for the donators who have supplemented their medical education. . .

"Because of the anonymity of the cadavers and the inherent stress of the situation, perhaps some students may ignore or trivialize the humanity of the cadavers. To address this problem, the Department of Hunan Anatomy holds formal memorial services for the cadavers at the beginning of the anatomy course. Relatives of the deceased are invited to attend, and appreciation is shown for use of the deceased’s remains. Holding memorial ceremonies for the relatives and students are an additional way to honor cadavers and recognize the nobility of body donation."

One wonders what sort of memorial was held to honor the cadavers on tour in the U.S.

The Chinese view here of the respect to be accorded to their own dead is certainly at odds with that of the American gawker who shells out $24 to see a man "respectfully" posed standing and split down the middle with (to use an Austin Powersism) his "bait" hanging off one half and "tackle" off the other. Or the fellow "respectfully" sliced in dozens of cross-sections and laid out on a table. Or the one riding a bicycle, as the dead are wont to do.

In the next update, we'll look at conflicting accounts of the origin of the consent form that never was and how it was altered before being presented to the public.
DiggIt!Add to del.icio.usAdd to Technorati Faves

8 comments:

marilyn said...

Jack...I've never been to an exhibit like this. When a saint's body is exhumed and displayed, are they clothed? I'm trying to understand the distinctions between appropriate and sinful displays for viewing...

ekbell said...

The photo's I've seen of Saint's bodies have either been dressed (in habit if appropriate) and lying in state or have been skeletal (and oft as not incrusted in gold and jewels).

It's not always according to modern taste but it is reverent (and no money is supposed to be made from it).

Anonymous said...

Good discussion: What is the difference between veneration and entertainment.

Also there is a distintion between the a life freely given in sacrafice to God and a life coercively sacrificed to support what looks to me like a travelling freak show.

marilyn said...

Thank you, ekbell...this is helpful...because it is so critical that we are able to understand and explain church actions and motives when questioning and boycotting those outside the church.

I don't think these promoters convey ahead of time that the deceased are cut open or decapitated which would be a horrid realization for me happening on this type of desecration!

kentuckyliz said...

The university is smart to teach respect of the body donors and to have the memorial.

In the US, med students' own pranks are the greatest obstacle to anyone considering donating their body. I certainly don't want to end up at football games, bars, and parties after I'm dead, hauled there by pranking med students. Yes, this happens, my anatomy prof told me all about it.

Scott said...

The difference between this and displaying saints is abundantly clear to me: having a cadaver sliced up and splayed out says: "You are a piece of meat." with imps whispering, "And that is all you are." in our ears.

marilyn said...

Dear Scott...there is a sacredness in how we are made...that reference in Isaiah: "You knit me in my mother's womb," becomes evident in scientific examination of God's placement of muscle and bone and the way all is literally woven together. I wouldn't hear those demonic 'whispering imps' you hear...nor would I have assumed that the bodies are dissected or dismembered ...

An article in the Star actually focused on how not one body was the same, in spite of their common race, alluding to their unique DNA, that Divine thumbprint of the Creator on each person that is a scientific mystery. It is possible a very reverent, spiritual motive could be at work if someone was unaware of the sinful abuses involved and did attend an event like this...it seems really hasty to label another's motives in attending this. I would have to assume they are uninformed - not irreverent gawkers as they've been labeled here, among other things. I appreciate that the local bishops didn't forbid families under penalty of sin from attending this but really made us think about it and search for answers by keeping our children in Catholic schools out of the exhibit...

Anonymous said...

I don't have a real motivation to see the exhibit, but I'm all for anyone who wants to. If you afraid of a science exhibit and want to live in a world of superstition, go for it. Don't condemn other people at all. People have to face death, in their family and themselves. There is no reason to believe wanting to see the makeup of our own bodies is anything bad. "Bait and tackle" ??? Prudishness over nudity is ridiculous and immature. Especially if it's for an art/ science display. Don't project your own insecurities on others.

Kentuckyliz, NO THAT IS NOT the greatest obstacle. It's any person's choice and it happens all the time. The biggest 'obstacle' is current traditions and people not being made aware of that different option. That's it.

Ever got junk mail asking you to donate your body to science? I doubt it. Ever got literature on funeral arrangements, or seen it on TV? I bet you have. Tradition and knowledge. Funeral homes don't want you to donate your body to science. They lose a ton of money.
Also Pretty bizarre fairy tale you have there about the med students. Sorry that's not something that happens. Has it ever happened? Maybe, but any med student mishandling remains risks expulsion and in the case of public display or prank, jailtime. Surely your anatomy prof would have told you THAT too right?

Scott, it doesn't say that to me. But we are made of tissue and other substances. It's scary, but we are impermanent organisms. To look and be curious about ourselves is not something to be ashamed of. We can learn a lot from it especially some important internal reflections.